The search for critical dimensions of personality pathology to inform diagnostic assessment and treatment planning: A commentary on Hopwood et al

Journal of Personality Disorders

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 303-310

  Clarkin, John F ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; NOTE; PERSONALITY DISORDER;

HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY DISORDERS;

EID: 84879142260     PISSN: 0885579X     EISSN: 19432763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2013.27.3.303     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barlow, D. H., Farchione, T., Fairholme, C., Ellard, K., Boisseau, C., Allen, L., et al. (2011). Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bender, D. S., & Skodol, A. E. (2007). Borderline personality as self-other representational disturbance. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 500-517.
3. Benjamin, L. S. (2005). Interpersonal theory of personality disorders: The structural analysis of social behavior and interpersonal reconstructive therapy. In M. F. Lenzenweger & J. F. Clarkin (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (2nd ed., pp. 157-230). New York: Guilford.
4. Clarkin, J. F., & De Panfilis, C. (2013). Developing conceptualization of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201, 88-93.
5. Clarkin, J. F., & Huprich, S. K. (2011). Do DSM-5 personality disorder proposals meet criteria for clinical utility? Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 192-205.
6. First, M. B., Pincus, H. A., Levine, J. B., Williams, J. B. W., Ustun, B., & Peele, R. (2004). Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 946-954.
7. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2006). The mentalization- focused approach to self-psychology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20, 544-576.
8. Frances, A. (in press). Essentials of psychiatric diagnosis. New York: Guilford Press.
9. Gunderson, J. G., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (2008). BPD's interpersonal hypersensitivity phenotype. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 22-41.
10. Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C., Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(3), 270-295.
11. Hyman, S. E. (2011). Diagnosis of mental disorders in light of modern genetics. In D. Regier, W. Narrow, E. Kuhl, & D. Kupfer (Eds.), The conceptual evolution of DSM-5 (pp. 3-18). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
12. Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe personality disorders: Psychotherapeutic strategies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Kernberg, O. F., & Caligor, E. (2005). A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. In M. F. Lenzenweger & J. F. Clarkin (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (2nd ed., pp. 114-156). New York: Guilford.
14. Lenzenweger, M. F. (2010). Current status of the scientific study of the personality disorders: An overview of epidemiological, longitudinal, experimental psychopathology, and neurobehavioral perspectives. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 58, 741-778.
15. Lenzenweger, M. F., & Clarkin, J. F. (Eds.). (2005). Major theories of personality disorder (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
16. Lenzenweger, M. F., Clarkin, J. F., Yeomans, F. E., Kernberg, O. F., & Levy, K. N. (2008). Refining the borderline personality disorder phenotype through finite mixture modeling: Implications for classification. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 313-331.
17. Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259-289.
18. Livesley, W. J. (2001). Conceptual and taxonomic issues. In W. J. Livesley (Ed.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 3-38). New York: Guilford.
19. Livesley, J., Dimaggio, G., & Clarkin, J. F. (Eds.). (in press). An integrated modular approach to the treatment of the personality disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
20. Meyer, B., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2005). An attachment model of personality disorders. In M. F. Lenzenweger & J. F. Clarkin (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (2nd ed., pp. 231- 281). New York: Guilford Press.
21. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.
22. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2008). Toward a unified theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within the cognitive-affective processing system. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and Research (3rd ed., pp. 208-241). New York: Guilford.
23. Sanislow, C. A., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. J., Kozak, M. J., Garvey, M. A., Heinssen, R. K., et al. (2010). Developing constructs for psychopathology research: Research domain criteria. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 631-639.
24. Trull, T. J. (2006). Dimensional models of personality disorder. In T. A. Widiger, E. Simonsen, P. J. Sirovatka, & D. Regie (Eds.), Dimensional models of personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM-V (pp. 171-188). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
25. Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2009). Using experience sampling methods/ ecological momentary assessment (ESM/ EMA) in clinical assessment and clinical research: Introduction to the special section. Psychological Assessment, 21, 457-462.
26. Verheul, R., Andrea, H., Berghout, C., Dolan, C., Busschbach, J., van der Kroft, P., et al. (2008). Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 20, 23-34.
27. Westen, D., Nakash, O., Thomas, C., & Bradley, R. (2006). Clinical assessment of attachment patterns and personality disorder in adolescents and adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1065-1085.
28. Widiger, T., Simonsen, E., Sirovatka, P., & Regier, D. (Eds.). (2006). Dimensional models of personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.