The impact of calcium sulfate and inert solids accumulation in post-combustion calcium looping systems

Fuel

Volumn 109, Issue , 2013, Pages 184-190

  Diego, M Elena ^a   Arias, Borja ^a   Alonso, Mónica ^a   Abanades, J Carlos ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DEL CARBÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Calcium looping; Carbonation; Coal combustion; Sulfation

Indexed keywords

CALCINATION; CALCIUM; CALCIUM CARBONATE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBONATION; COAL; SULFUR;

CALCIUM LOOPING; CAPTURE EFFICIENCY; MASS AND ENERGY BALANCE; OPERATING CONDITION; POST-COMBUSTION CO; PROCESS CONFIGURATION; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; SULFATION;

COAL COMBUSTION;

EID: 84879114100     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.062     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Metz B, Davidson O, Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L. Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
2. 2 with CaO. AlChE J 2011;57:1356-66.
3. 2 capture process with two circulating fluidized bed carbonator reactors. Ind Eng Chem Res 2011;50:9685-95.
4. 2 capture with CaO. Status of the technology and next steps towards large scale demonstration. Energy Procedia 2011;4:852-9.
5. 2 capture with CaO. In: 21st International conference on fluidized bed combustion, Naples (Italy); 2012, p. 365-72.
6. th dual fluidized bed pilot plant. Energy Procedia 2011;4:441-8.
7. 2 capture: plant operating experiences and results. In: 21st International conference on fluidized bed combustion, Naples (Italy); 2012, p. 397-404.
8. th carbonate and chemical looping CCS test rig. VGB Power Tech 2011;91:64-8.
9. Plötz S, Bayrak A, Galloy A, Kremer J, Orth M, Wieczorek M, Ströhle J, Epple B. First carbonate looping experiments with a 1 MWth test facility consisting of two interconnected CFBs. In: 21st International conference on fluidized bed combustion, Naples (Italy); 2012, p. 421-8.
10. 2 from combustion processes. Chem Eng Res Des 1999;77:62-8.
11. 2 capture system using CaO. Chem Eng J 2008;138:148-54.
12. 2 capture with CaO. Environ Sci Technol 2005;39:2861-6.
13. 2 capture in existing power plants. Energy Convers Manage 2008;49:2809-14.
14. 2 capture. Energy Procedia 2009;1:1099-106.
15. Hawthorne C, Trossmann M, Galindo Cifre P, Schuster A, Scheffknecht G. Simulation of the carbonate looping power cycle. Energy Procedia 2009;1:1387-94.
16. 2 capture system. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010;4:603-12.
17. Lasheras A, Ströhle J, Galloy A, Epple B. Carbonate looping process simulation using a 1D fluidized bed model for the carbonator. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2011;5:686-93.
18. 2 capture in existing power plants. AlChE J 2011;57:2599-607.
19. 2 capture cycle and coal-fired power plants. A comparative study for different sorbents. Energy Fuels 2010;24:728-36.
20. 2 capture system using CaO. Chem Eng J 2009;147:252-8.
21. 2 capture from flue gas using carbonation/calcination cycles. AlChE J 2008;54:1912-25.
22. 2 capture by limestone resulting from calcination/sulfation/carbonation cycles. Energy Fuels 2005;19:1927-34.
23. 2. Energy Fuels 2006;21:163-70.
24. 2 capture characteristics of three limestones in a fluidized-bed reactor. Energy Fuels 2006;20:1621-8.
25. Grasa GS, Alonso M, Abanades JC. Sulfation of CaO particles in a carbonation/calcination loop to capture CO2. Ind Eng Chem Res 2008;47:1630-5. (Pubitemid 351488435)
26. 2 capture enhanced by steam reactivation of a CaO-based sorbent. Fuel 2008;87:1564-73.
27. Hughes RW, Lu D, Anthony EJ, Wu Y. Improved long-term conversion of limestone-derived sorbents for in situ capture of CO2 in a fluidized bed combustor. Ind Eng Chem Res 2004;43:5529-39. (Pubitemid 39128902)
28. 2 capture cycles. Environ Sci Technol 2007;41:1420-5.
29. 2 from combustion and other systems. J Energy Inst 2007;80:116-9.
30. 2 looping cycle reactor. Fuel 2008;87:3344-52.
31. 2 capture. In: 4th International conference on clean coal technologies, Dresden, Germany; 2009.
32. Arias B, Grasa GS, Abanades JC. Effect of sorbent hydration on the average activity of CaO in a Ca-looping system. Chem Eng J 2010;163:324-30.
33. 2 capture. Environ Sci Technol 2010;44:9496-501.
34. Phalak N, Deshpande N, Fan LS. Investigation of high-temperature steam hydration of naturally derived calcium oxide for improved carbon dioxide capture capacity over multiple cycles. Energy Fuels 2012;26:3903-9.
35. Arias B, Grasa GS, Alonso M, Abanades JC. Post-combustion calcium looping process with a highly stable sorbent activity by recarbonation. Energy Environ Sci 2012;5:7353-9.
36. 2 from a combustion flue gas. Chem Eng Sci 2009;64:883-91.
37. Rodríguez N, Alonso M, Abanades JC. Average activity of CaO particles in a calcium looping system. Chem Eng J 2010;156:388-94.
38. 2 capture. Powder Technol 2010;200:117-27.
39. 2 capture by calcium looping. Chem Eng J 2012;198-199:228-35.
40. 2 capture. Combust Sci Technol 2012;184:929-41.
41. 2 capture capacity of CaO in long series of carbonation/calcination cycles. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006;45:8846-51.
42. 2 capture. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2010;36:260-79.
43. 2 capture: a perspective. Ind Eng Chem Res 2011;51:2133-42.
44. 2 capture. Environ Sci Technol 2012;46:1262-9.
45. Arias B, Grasa G, Abanades JC, Manovic V, Anthony EJ. The effect of steam on the fast carbonation reaction rates of CaO. Ind Eng Chem Res 2012;51:2478-82.
46. 2 capture from power generation, cement manufacture and hydrogen production. Chem Eng Res Des 2011;89:836-55.
47. 2 capture systems. Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol 2011;1:72-82.