Population based trends in procedures following sling surgery for urinary incontinence

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 775-780

  Suskind, Anne M ^a   Kaufman, Samuel R ^a   Dunn, Rodney L ^a   Stoffel, John T ^a   Clemens, J Quentin ^a   Hollenbeck, Brent K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Midurethral sling; Population based; Sling removal and revision; Urethrolysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SLING SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREND STUDY; URGE INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84879105469     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: 14333023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1930-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bemelmans BL (2007) Stress urinary incontinence and the future of urology. Eur Urol 51(1):15-16
2. Anger JT et al (2006) The prevalence of urinary incontinence among community dwelling men: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey. J Urol 176(5):2103-2108, discussion 2108
3. Deng DY et al (2007) Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: are complications under-reported? Neurourol Urodyn 26(1):46-52
4. Abouassaly R et al (2004) Complications of tension-free vaginal tape surgery: a multi-institutional review. BJU Int 94(1):110-113
5. Ogah J, Cody DJ, Rogerson L (2011) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn 30(3):284-291
6. Stanford EJ, Paraiso MF (2008) A comprehensive review of suburethral sling procedure complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(2):132-145
7. (HCUP)., A.f.H.R.a.Q.H.C.a.U.P. Introduction to the HCUP State Ambulatory Surgery Databases (SASD). 2011 [cited 2012 January 4]; Available from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/sasddist/Introduction-to-SASD.pdf
8. Census, U.S. Population estimates for Florida. [cited 2011 November 7, 2011]; Available from: http://www.census.gov/popest/intercensal/state/ST- EST00INT-02.html
9. Diez Roux AV et al (2001) Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 345(2):99-106
10. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613-619
11. Care, T.D.A.o.H. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care; Data by Region. 2012; Available from: http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/data/region/
12. Suskind AM et al (2012) Population-based trends in ambulatory surgery for urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. doi: 10:1007/s00192-012-1823-y Accessed 6 Jan 2012
13. Koelbl H et al (2001) Transurethral penetration of a tension-free vaginal tape. BJOG 108(7):763-765
14. Levin I et al (2004) Surgical complications and medium-term outcome results of tension-free vaginal tape: a prospective study of 313 consecutive patients. Neurourol Urodyn 23(1):7-9
15. Radcliff TA, Dobalian A, Duncan RP (2005) A comparison of seasonal resident and year-round resident hospitalizations in Florida. Fla Public Health Rev 2:63-72