How much information is ‘enough’?

Clinical Ethics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 13-15

  Fovargue, Sara ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879102738     PISSN: 14777509     EISSN: 1758101X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ce.2009.009042     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Chatterton v Gerson [1981] 1 All ER 257.
2. Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors and others [1985] 1 All ER 643, HL.
3. Montgomery J. Power/knowledge/consent: medical decisionmaking. Mod Law Rev 1988; 51: 245, 247.
4. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118.
5. Scarman L. Consent, communication and responsibility. J Roy Soc Med 1986; 79: 69–70.
6. Gold v Haringey Health Authority [1987] 2 All ER 888, CA.
7. Blyth v Bloomsbury [1993] 4 Med. LR 151, CA.
8. Smith v Tunbridge Wells Health Authority [1994] 5 Med. LR 334.
9. Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust [1999] PIQR 53, CA.
10. Rogers v Whittaker (1992) 175 C.L.R. 479, 490.
11. Miola J. On the materiality of risk: paper tigers and panaceas. Med Law Rev 2009; 17: 76.
12. Previously GMC. Seeking Patients' Consent: The Ethical Considerations. London: GMC, 1998.
13. GMC. Consent: Patients and Doctors making Decisions Together. London: GMC, 2008.
14. Brazier M, Cave E. Medicine, Patients and the Law. 4th edn. London: Butterworths, 2007; chapter 7.
15. Herring J. Medical Law and Ethics. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008; chapter 4.
16. Jackson E. Medical Law: Text, Cases and Materials. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009; chapter 4.