Pain at insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in nulligravida and parous women with and without cesarean section

Contraception

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 164-168

  Santos, Ana Raquel Gouvea ^a   Bahamondes, M Valeria ^a   Hidalgo, M Margarete ^a   Atti, Ana ^a   Bahamondes, Luis ^a   Monteiro, Ilza ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Insertion; Levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system; Mirena; Nulligravidas; Parous women

Indexed keywords

LEVONORGESTREL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LEVONORGESTREL RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPARA; NULLIGRAVIDA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PARITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; UTERINE CERVIX INCOMPETENCE; UTERUS INVERSION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; BRAZIL; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, MEDICATED; LEVONORGESTREL; MATERIALS TESTING; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PARITY; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879096521     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.015     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Pesquisa Nacional de Demografia e Saúde da Criança e da Mulher PNDS 2006.
2. C. d'Arcangues Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception Contraception 75 2007 S2 S7
3. J. Dueñas, A. Albert, and F. Carrasco Intrauterine contraception in nulligravid vs parous women Contraception 53 1996 23 24
4. H. Veldhuis Complications of the intrauterine device in nulliparous and parous women Eur Gen Pract 10 2004 82 87
5. M.V. Bahamondes, M.M. Hidalgo, L. Bahamondes, and I. Monteiro Ease of insertion and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in nulligravidas Contraception 84 2011 e11 e16
6. R. Lyus, P. Lohr, and S. Prager Board of the Society of Family Planning. Use of the Mirena LNG-IUS and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women Contraception 81 2010 367 371
7. L. Gibbons, J.M. Belizan, J.A. Lauer, A.P. Betran, M. Merialdi, and F. Althabe Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world Am J Obstet Gynecol 206 2012 e1 e19
8. O.O. Vikhareva, L. Jokubkiene, and L. Valentin High prevalence of defects in cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34 2009 90 97
9. D. Ofili-Yebovi, J. Ben-Nagi, and E. Sawyer Deficient lower-segment cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31 2008 72 77
10. C. Fabres, G. Aviles, and C. De La Jara The cesarean delivery scar pouch. Clinical implications and diagnostic correlations between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy J Ultrasound Med 22 2003 265 300
11. C.B. Wang, W.W.C. Chiu, C.Y. Lee, Y.L. Sun, Y.L. Lin, and C.J. Tseng Cesarean scar defect: correlation between cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34 2009 85 89
12. World Health Organization Intrauterine devices: technical and managerial guidelines for services 1997 World Health Organization Geneva
13. F. Howard Chronic pelvic pain Obstet Gynecol 101 2003 594 611
14. J.M. Woodforde, and H. Merskey Some relationships between subjective measures of pain J Psychosom Res 16 1972 173 178
15. N.L. Stanwood, J.M. Garrett, and T.R. Konrad Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice Obstet Gynecol 99 2002 275 280
16. A. Brockmeyer, M. Kishen, and A. Webb Experience of IUD/IUS insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women - a pilot study Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 13 2008 248 254
17. D. Hubacher, V. Reyes, S. Lillo, A. Zepeda, P.L. Chen, and H. Croxatto Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen Am J Obstet Gynecol 195 2006 1272 1277
18. J. Chor, J. Bregand-White, and A. Golobof Ibuprofen prophylaxis for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion: a randomized controlled trial Contraception 6 2012 558 562
19. I. Sivin, S. El Mahgoub, and T. McCarthy Long term contraception with the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNG 20) and the cooper T 380 Ag intrauterine device: a five year randomized study Contraception 42 1990 361 378
20. L. Marions, L. Lovkist, A. Taube, M. Johansson, H. Dalvik, and I. Overlie Use of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system in nulliparous women - a non-interventional study in Sweden Eur J Contracep Reprod Health Care 16 2011 126 134
21. K. Wellings, Z. Zhihong, A. Krentel, G. Barretta, and A. Glasier Attitudes towards long-acting reversible methods of contraception in general practice in the UK Contraception 76 2007 208 214
22. A. Tinelli, R. Tinelli, and A. Malvasi The intrauterine device in modern contraception: still an actuality? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 11 2006 197 201
23. K.R. Petersen, J. Brooks, and B. Jacobsen Intrauterine devices in nulliparous women Adv Contraception 7 1991 331 338
24. I. Late, P. Morales, and J.L. de Pablo Use of intrauterine contraceptive devices in nulliparous women: personal experience over a 12-year period Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 3 1998 190 193
25. A.R. Hidalgo, and E.P. Ribera Use of the intrauterine device. Efficacy and safety Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 5 2000 198 207
26. World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use (2010). Available online at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/ publications/family-planning/9789241563888/en/ (accessed September 2010).
27. UK medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use: (UKMEC 2005/2006). http://www.ffprhc.org.uk/admin/uplouds/298-UKMEC-20052006.pdf. (accessed April, 2012).
28. E. Stubbs, and A. Schamo The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out? Can Fam Physician 54 2008 560 566
29. N.L. Stanwood, J.M. Garrett, and T.R. Konrad Obstetricians-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice Obstet Gynecol 99 2002 275 280
30. K.I. Black, T. Sakhaei, and S.M. Garland A study investigating obstetricians and gynaecologists management of women requesting an intrauterine device Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 50 2010 184 188
31. B. Winner, J.F. Peipert, Q. Zhao, C. Buckel, T. Madden, and J.E. Allsworth Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception N Engl J Med 21 2012 1998 2007
32. Bij de Vaate AJ, J.A. Huirne, J.H. van der Slikke, R. Schats, and H.A. Brölmann Medical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17 2010 133