Intrauterine contraception in nulligravid vs parous women

Contraception

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 23-24

  Dueñas Diez, Jose Luis ^a   Albert, A ^a   Carrasco, F ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

infertility; IUD; nulligravid; parous; PID

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMALE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; FEMALE STERILIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPARA; NULLIPARA; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; VAGINA BLEEDING;

EID: 17544389023     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00025-9     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Tietze C, Lewit S. Recommended procedures for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception. Stud Fam Plann 1973,4:35-2.
2. Shelton JD, Taylor RN. The Pearl index reexamined: Still useful for clinical trials of contraceptive. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;139:592-6.
3. Chi IC. The Multiload IUD a U.S. researcher's evaluation of a European device. Contraception 1992,46:407-25.
4. Struthers BJ. Copper IUDs, PID and fertility in nulliparous women. Adv Contracept 1991;7:211-30.
5. Krommal RA, Whitney CW, Mumford SD. The intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease: The Women's Health Study reanalysed. J Clin Epidemiol 1991;44:109-22.