Clinical and radiological outcomes of microscopic partial pediculectomy for degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Yamada, Kentaro ^a,b   Matsuda, Hideki ^a   Cho, Hisanori ^a   Habunaga, Hiroshi ^a   Kono, Hiroshi ^a   Nakamura, Hiroaki ^b  

^a Ishikiriseiki Hospital   (Japan)

^b OSAKA CITY UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Clinical outcomes; Craniocaudal stenosis; Foraminal height; Lumbar foraminal stenosis; Microsurgical decompression; Minimum pedicle diameter; Multidetector row computed tomography; Multivariate logistic regression analysis; Partial pediculectomy; Pedicle screw; Risk factor; Scoliosis progression; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR FORAMINAL STENOSIS; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION SCORE; LEG PAIN; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROSCOPIC PARTIAL PEDICULECTOMY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL RISK; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BONE SCREW; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DEVICES; FEASIBILITY STUDY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL STENOSIS; SPINE FUSION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BONE SCREWS; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; SPINAL STENOSIS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84879091302     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828f4e12     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Porter RW, Hibbert C, Evans C. The natural history of root entrapment syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984; 9: 418-21.
2. Kunogi J, Hasue M. Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991; 16: 1312-20.
3. Jenis LG, An HS. Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 389-94.
4. Ploumis A, Transfeldt EE, Gilbert TJ Jr, et al. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis: radiographic correlation of lateral rotatory olisthesis with neural canal dimensions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 2353-8.
5. Kaneko Y, Matsumoto M, Takaishi H, et al. Morphometric analysis of the lumbar intervertebral foramen in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis by multidetector-row computed tomography. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 2594-602.
6. Nathan H, Weizenbluth M, Halperin N. The lumbosacral ligament (LSL), with special emphasis on the "lumbosacral tunnel" and the entrapment of the 5th lumbar nerve. Int Orthop 1982; 6: 197-202.
7. Wiltse LL, Guyer RD, Spencer CW, et al. Alar transverse process impingement of the L5 spinal nerve: the far-out syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984; 9: 31-41.
8. Inufusa A, An HS, Lim TH, et al. Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion-extension movement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21: 2412-20.
9. Fujiwara A, An HS, Lim TH, et al. Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 876-82.
10. Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, et al. Microsurgical nerve root canal widening without fusion for lumbosacral intervertebral foraminal stenosis: technical notes and early results. Spinal Cord 1996; 34: 644-50.
11. Sheehan JM, Helm GA, Kallmes DF, et al. Partial pediculectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 308-10.
12. Shenouda EF, Gill SS. Laminal fenestration for the treatment of lumbar nerve root foraminal stenosis. Br J Neurosurg 2002; 16: 494-6; discussion 7.
13. Hallett A, Huntley JS, Gibson JN. Foraminal stenosis and singlelevel degenerative disc disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing decompression with decompression and instrumented fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 1375-80.
14. Ozeki N, Aota Y, Uesugi M, et al. Clinical results of intrapedicular partial pediculectomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21: 324-7.
15. Yamada H, Yoshida M, Hashizume H, et al. Efficacy of novel minimally invasive surgery using spinal microendoscope for treating extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012; 25: 268-76.
16. Yamada K, Matsuda H, Nabeta M, et al. Clinical outcomes of microscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis: a comparison between patients with and without degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 947-53.
17. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Takemoto M, et al. Paraspinal-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 13: 500-8.
18. Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K. Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1986; 11: 107-10.
19. Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 17-23.
20. Benner B, Ehni G. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1979; 4: 548-52.
21. Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2005; 14: 925-48.
22. Kelleher MO, Timlin M, Persaud O, et al. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E981-7.
23. Fritsch EW, Heisel J, Rupp S. The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21: 626-33.
24. Selznick LA, Shamji MF, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22: 207-13.
25. Wildermuth S, Zanetti M, Duewell S, et al. Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography. Radiology 1998; 207: 391-8.
26. Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 1919-24.
27. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, et al. Expansive opendoor laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8: 693-9.
28. Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, et al. Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61: 479-95.
29. Li B, Jiang B, Fu Z, et al. Accurate determination of isthmus of lumbar pedicle: a morphometric study using reformatted computed tomographic images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 2438-44.
30. Makino T, Kaito T, Fujiwara H, et al. Analysis of lumbar pedicle morphology in degenerative spines using multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography: what can be the reliable index for optimal pedicle screw diameter ? Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 1516-21.
31. Hasegawa T, Mikawa Y, Watanabe R, et al. Morphometric analysis of the lumbosacral nerve roots and dorsal root ganglia by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21: 1005-9.
32. Darden BV, 2nd, Wade JF, Alexander R, et al. Far lateral disc herniations treated by microscopic fragment excision. Techniques and results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 1500-5.
33. Chang SB, Lee SH, Ahn Y, et al. Risk factor for unsatisfactory outcome after lumbar foraminal and far lateral microdecompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 1163-7.
34. Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, et al. Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989; 14: 367-72.
35. Pritchett JW, Bortel DT. Degenerative symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993; 18: 700-3.
36. Kohno S, Ikeuchi M, Taniguchi S, et al. Factors predicting progression in early degenerative lumbar scoliosis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2011; 19: 141-4.