Classic Whipple versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in the ACS NSQIP

Journal of Surgical Research

Volumn 183, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 170-176

  Leichtle, Stefan W ^a   Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos ^a   Mouawad, Nicolas J ^a   Welch, Kathleen B ^b   Lampman, Richard ^a   Hoshal Jr , Verne L ^a   Kreske, Edward ^a  

^a Saint Joseph Mercy Health System   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

NSQIP; Outcomes; Propensity matched comparison; Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy; Whipple operation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CANCER; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER SURGERY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER CANCER; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM TUMOR; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DISEASE; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS TUMOR; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; PYLORUS PRESERVING PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; SMALL INTESTINE CANCER; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84879085661     PISSN: 00224804     EISSN: 10958673     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.016     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. J.L. Cameron, H.A. Pitt, C.J. Yeo, K.D. Lillemoe, H.S. Kaufman, and J. Coleman One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality Ann Surg 217 1993 430
2. T.E. Clancy, and S.W. Ashley Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple operation) Surg Oncol C lin N Am 14 2005 533
3. L.W. Traverso, and W.P. Longmire Jr. Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy Surg Gynecol Obstet 146 1978 959
4. C.A. Seiler, M. Wagner, and T. Bachmann Randomized clinical trial of pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection - long term results Br J Surg 92 2005 547
5. F.A. Wenger, C.A. Jacobi, K. Haubold, H.U. Zieren, and J.M. Muller [Gastrointestinal quality of life after duodenopancreatectomy in pancreatic carcinoma. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study: pancreatoduodenectomy or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy] Chirurg 70 1999 1454
6. N. Iqbal, R.E. Lovegrove, and H.S. Tilney A comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 2822 patients Eur J Surg Oncol 34 2008 1237
7. H. Witzigmann, D. Max, and D. Uhlmann Outcome after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection is improved compared with classic Whipple procedure in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis Surgery 134 2003 53
8. J.H. Klinkenbijl, G.P. van der Schelling, W.C. Hop, R. van Pel, H.A. Bruining, and J. Jeekel The advantages of pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy in malignant disease of the pancreas and periampullary region Ann Surg 216 1992 142
9. M.K. Diener, C. Fitzmaurice, and G. Schwarzer Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5 2011 CD006053
10. P.W. Lin, Y.S. Shan, Y.J. Lin, and C.J. Hung Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer: PPPD versus Whipple procedure Hepatogastroenterology 52 2005 1601
11. K.T. Tran, H.G. Smeenk, and C.H. van Eijck Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors Ann Surg 240 2004 738
12. C.J. Yeo, T.A. Sohn, J.L. Cameron, R.H. Hruban, K.D. Lillemoe, and H.A. Pitt Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors Ann Surg 227 1998 821
13. V.L. Hoshal Jr., M.B. Benedict, L.R. David, and J. Kulick Personal experience with the Whipple operation: outcomes and lessons learned Am Surg 70 2004 121
14. S.F. Khuri, J. Daley, and W. Henderson The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program Ann Surg 228 1998 491
15. C.L. Davis, J.R. Pierce, and W. Henderson Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs national surgical quality improvement program J Am Coll Surg 204 2007 550
16. M. Shiloach, S.K. Frencher Jr., and J.E. Steeger Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program J Am Coll Surg 210 2010 6
17. D.B. Rubin Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores Ann Intern Med 127 1997 757
18. K.H. Kwok, J. Rizk, M. Coleman, and D. Fenton-Lee Pancreaticoduodenectomy - outcomes from an Australian institution ANZ J Surg 80 2010 605
19. P.W. Lin, and Y.J. Lin Prospective randomized comparison between pylorus-preserving and standard pancreaticoduodenectomy Br J Surg 86 1999 603
20. C.P. Smith, M.L. Cheatham, M.W. Lube, and K. Safcsak Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a community general surgery residency program Am Surg 72 2006 750
21. P.J. Karanicolas, E. Davies, and R. Kunz The pylorus: take it or leave it? Systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus standard whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary cancer Ann Surg Oncol 14 2007 1825
22. G.D. Kennedy, V. Rajamanickam, and E.S. O'Connor Optimizing surgical care of colon cancer in the older adult population Ann Surg 253 2011 508
23. M.M. Hutter, S. Randall, S.F. Khuri, W.G. Henderson, W.M. Abbott, and A.L. Warshaw Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Ann Surg 243 2006 657