A benedictory ode to urological live surgery

BJU International

Volumn 112, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 11-12

  Rao, Amrith R ^a   Karim, Omer ^a  

^a WEXHAM PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; UROLOGIC SURGERY; UROLOGICAL LIVE SURGERY;

HUMANS; TEACHING; UROGENITAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES; UROLOGY; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84879081521     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11780.x     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Smith A,. Urological live surgery-an anathema. BJU Int 2012; 110: 299-300
2. van Lingen A,. Your life in their hands. Published online 27 November 2006. Accessed at http://www.birth-of-tv.org/birth/assetView.do?asset= 1413260435-1164637516. Accessed 28 August 2012
3. Misaki T, Takamoto S, Matsuda H, Shigematsu H,. Joint Committee for the Establishment of Guidelines for the Live Session of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Published August 2007. Available at http://jscvs.umin.ac.jp/eng/live. html. Accessed 28 August 2012
4. Challacombe B, Weston R, Coughlin G, Murphy D, Dasgupta P,. Live surgical demonstrations in urology: valuable educational tool or putting patients at risk? BJU Int 2010; 106: 1571-1574
5. Mullins JK, Borofsky MS, Allaf ME, et al. Live Robotic Surgery: are outcomes compromised? Urology 2012; 80: 602-607
6. Altunrende F, Autorino R, Haber GP, et al. Immediate impact of a robotic kidney surgery course on attendees practice patterns. Int J Med Robot. 2011; 7: 165-169. doi: 10.1002/rcs.384