Live robotic surgery: Are outcomes compromised?

Urology

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 602-607

  Mullins, Jeffrey K ^b   Borofsky, Michael S ^a   Allaf, Mohamad E ^b   Bhayani, Sam ^c   Kaouk, Jihad H ^d   Rogers, Craig G ^e   Hillyer, Shahab P ^d   Kaczmarek, Bartosz F ^e   Tanagho, Youssef S ^c   Stifelman, Michael D ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PHYSICIAN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; TELECOMMUNICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84865490075     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.03.050     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. G.J. Dehmer, J.S. Douglas Jr, A. Abizaid SCAI/ACCF/HRS/ESC/SOLACI/APSIC statement on the use of live case demonstrations at cardiology meetings: assessments of the past and standards for the future J Am Coll Cardiol 56 2010 1267 1282
2. B. Challacombe, R. Weston, G. Coughlin Live surgical demonstrations in urology: valuable educational tool or putting patients at risk? BJU Int 106 2010 1571 1574
3. A. Kruse, U. Beilenhoff, A.T. Axon ESGE/ESGENA guideline for live demonstration courses Endoscopy 35 2003 781 784
4. R.M. Sade American Association for Thoracic Surgery Ethics Committee Society of Thoracic Surgeons Standards and Ethics Committee Broadcast of surgical procedures as a teaching instrument in cardiothoracic surgery J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136 2008 273 277
5. A. Kutikov, R.G. Uzzo The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth J Urol 182 2009 844 853
6. S.B. Smith, V. Macchi, A. Parenti Hieronymus [corrected] Fabricius Ab Acquapendente (1533-1619) Clin Anat 17 2004 540 543
7. D.F. Kallmes, H.J. Cloft, A. Molyneux Live case demonstrations: patient safety, ethics, consent, and conflicts Lancet 377 2011 1539 1541
8. A. Schmit, G. Lazaraki, A. Hittelet Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during live endoscopy workshop demonstrations Endoscopy 37 2005 695 699
9. Z. Liao, Z.S. Li, J.W. Leung How safe and successful are live demonstrations of therapeutic ERCP? A large multicenter study Am J Gastroenterol 104 2009 47 52
10. Patient in 'live' surgery showing died soon after Japan Times 2007 http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20070607a5.html
11. C.P. Filson, M. Banerjee, J.S. Wolf Jr Surgeon characteristics and long-term trends in the adoption of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy J Urol 185 2011 2072 2077
12. D.C. Miller, C.S. Saigal, M. Banerjee Diffusion of surgical innovation among patients with kidney cancer Cancer 112 2008 1708 1717
13. F. Altunrende, R. Autorino, G.P. Haber Immediate impact of a robotic kidney surgery course on attendees practice patterns Int J Med Robot 2011 [Epub ahead of print]
14. J. Franke, B. Reimers, M. Scarpa Complications of carotid stenting during live transmissions JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2 2009 887 891
15. J. Seeburger, A. Diegeler, K. Dossche Live broadcasting in cardiac surgery does not increase the operative risk Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40 2011 367 371
16. H.K. Vanermen Live surgery should not be outlawed at national and regional cardiothoracic meetings J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139 2010 822 825
17. R.J. Lynch, M.J. Englesbe, L. Sturm Measurement of foot traffic in the operating room: implications for infection control Am J Med Qual 24 2009 45 52