Validation of a new 96-well plate spectrophotometric method for the quantification of compound 48/80 associated with particles

AAPS PharmSciTech

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 649-655

  Bento, Dulce ^a,b   Borchard, Gerrit ^c   Gonçalves, Teresa ^a,d   Borges, Olga ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

C48 80; chitosan nanoparticles; mast cell activator; method validation; p Methoxy N methylphenethylamine

Indexed keywords

ACETALDEHYDE; ALGINIC ACID; CHITOSAN; COMPOUND 48-80; NANOPARTICLE; NITROPRUSSIDE SODIUM; WATER;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

ACETALDEHYDE; ADJUVANTS, IMMUNOLOGIC; ALGINATES; CALIBRATION; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; CHITOSAN; DRUG CARRIERS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LINEAR MODELS; MICROSPECTROPHOTOMETRY; MINIATURIZATION; NANOPARTICLES; NITROPRUSSIDE; P-METHOXY-N-METHYLPHENETHYLAMINE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLVENTS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET; TECHNOLOGY, PHARMACEUTICAL; WATER;

EID: 84879080664     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15309932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-013-9950-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Rothschild AM. Mechanisms of histamine release by compound 48-80. Br J Pharmacol. 1970;38(1):253-62.
2. McLachlan JB, Shelburne CP, Hart JP, Pizzo SV, Goyal R, Brooking-Dixon R, et al. Mast cell activators: a new class of highly effective vaccine adjuvants. Nat Med. 2008;14(5):536-41.
3. Staats HF, Fielhauer JR, Thompson AL, Tripp AA, Sobel AE, Maddaloni M, et al. Mucosal targeting of a BoNT/A subunit vaccine adjuvanted with a mast cell activator enhances induction of BoNT/A neutralizing antibodies in rabbits. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16532.
4. McGowen AL, Hale LP, Shelburne CP, Abraham SN, Staats HF. The mast cell activator compound 48/80 is safe and effective when used as an adjuvant for intradermal immunization with Bacillus anthracis protective antigen. Vaccine. 2009;27(27):3544-52.
5. Wang SH, Kirwan SM, Abraham SN, Staats HF, Hickey AJ. Stable dry powder formulation for nasal delivery of anthrax vaccine. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101(1):31-47.
6. Vajdy M, Srivastava I, Polo J, Donnelly J, O'Hagan D, Singh M. Mucosal adjuvants and delivery systems for protein-, DNA- and RNA-based vaccines. Immunol Cell Biol. 2004;82(6):617-27.
7. Paton WD. Compound 48/80: a potent histamine liberator. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1951;6(3):499-508.
8. Lin CM, Wagner C. Quantitative determination of secondary amines: measurement of N-methylalanine. Anal Biochem. 1974;60(1):278-84.
9. Cullis CF, Waddington DJ. The colorimetric determination of secondary amines. Anal Chim Acta. 1956;15:158-63.
10. O'Neal CL, Crouch DJ, Fatah AA. Validation of twelve chemical spot tests for the detection of drugs of abuse. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;109(3):189-201.
11. Gan Q, Wang T. Chitosan nanoparticle as protein delivery carrier - systematic examination of fabrication conditions for efficient loading and release. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2007;59(1):24-34.
12. Rajaonarivony M, Vauthier C, Couarraze G, Puisieux F, Couvreur P. Development of a new drug carrier made from alginate. J Pharm Sci. 1993;82(9):912-7.
13. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline. Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2(R1). 2005.
14. Huber L, editor. Validation and qualification in analytical laboratories. 2nd ed. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2007.
15. Taverniers I, De Loose M, Van Bockstaele E. Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. II. Analytical method validation and quality assurance. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2004;23(8):535-52.
16. Ermer J, Burgess C, Kleinschmidt G, McB. Miller JH. Performance parameters, calculations and tests. Method validation in pharmaceutical analysis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2005. p. 21-194.
17. Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R. Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem. 2002;74:835-55.
18. Eurachem. The fitness for purpose of analytical methods: a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics. http://www.eurachem.org/guides/ pdf/valid.pdf (1998). Technology