Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: Technical note

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Liu, Xinyu ^a   Yuan, Suomao ^a   Tian, Yonghao ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bilateral decompression; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Spinous process splitting; Unilateral laminotomy

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE; BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION SCORE; LAMINECTOMY; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODIFIED UNILATERAL LAMINOTOMY FOR BILATERAL DECOMPRESSION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ATROPHY; BLOOD; CHINA; COMPLICATION; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PARASPINAL MUSCLE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINAL STENOSIS; TIME;

AGED; ATROPHY; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CHINA; CREATINE KINASE; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PARASPINAL MUSCLES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL STENOSIS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84879074264     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828fc84c     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Gille O, Jolivet E, Dousset V, et al. Erector spinae muscle changes on magnetic resonance imaging following lumbar surgery through a posterior approach. Spine 2007; 32: 1236-41.
2. Hara M, Takayasu M, Takagi T, et al. En bloc laminoplasty performed with threadwire saw. J Neurosurgery 2001; 48: 235-9.
3. Kang CH, Shin MJ, Kim SM, et al. MRI of paraspinal muscles in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients and control patients with chronic low back pain. Clin Radiol 2007; 62: 479-86.
4. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 1996; 21: 941-4.
5. Kim K, Isu T, Sugawara A, et al. Comparison of the effect of 3 different approaches to the lumbar spinal canal on postoperative paraspinal muscle damage. Surg Neurol 2008; 69: 109-13.
6. Kotil K, Tunckale T, Tatar Z, et al. Serum creatine phosphokinase activity and histological changes in the multifidus muscle: a prospective randomized controlled comparative study of discectomy with or without retraction. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6: 121-5.
7. Liu X, Wang Y, Wu X, et al. Impact of surgical approaches on the lumbar multifidus muscle: an experimental study using sheep as models. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 570-6.
8. Oertel MF, Ryang YM, Korinth MC, et al. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. Neurosurgery 2006; 59: 1264-9.
9. Spetzger U, Bertalanffy H, Reinges MH, et al. Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Clinical experiences. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997; 139: 397-403.
10. Watanabe K, Hosoya T, Shiraishi T, et al. Lumbar spinous processsplitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 405-8.
11. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1999; 24: 1023-8.
12. Yong-Hing K, Kirkaldy-Willis WH. Osteotomy of lumbar spinous process to increase surgical exposure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978; 134: 218-20.