A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: The uncemented paradox hip

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 471, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 2052-2059

  Troelsen, Anders ^a,b   Malchau, Erik ^a   Sillesen, Nanna ^a,b   Malchau, Henrik ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Mental Health Center Glostrup   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; DENMARK; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; IMPLANT REGISTRY; NEW ZEALAND; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL RISK; SWEDEN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREND STUDY; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84879072242     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide, AOA 2011. Available at: https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide. edu.au/en/annual-reports-2011. Accessed March 12, 2013.
2. Berry DJ, Bozic KJ. Current practice patterns in primary hip and knee arthroplasty among members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(suppl):2-4.
3. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:171-177.
4. Callaghan JJ, Bracha P, Liu SS, Piyaworakhun S, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Survivorship of a Charnley total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of thirty-five years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2617-2621.
5. Canadian Institute for Health Information. CIHI Annual Report. Available at: https://securecihica/estore/productSerieshtm?pc=PCC241. Accessed March 13, 2013.
6. Corbett KL, Losina E, Nti AA, Prokopetz JJ, Katz JN. Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. PloS One. 2010;5:e13520.
7. Corten K, Bourne RB, Charron KD, Au K, Rorabeck CH. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement: a randomized trial. A concise follow-up, at twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1335-1338.
8. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Available at: http://wwwdhr.dk/annual- report.htm. Accessed March 12, 2013.
9. Della Valle CJ, Mesko NW, Quigley L, Rosenberg AG, Jacobs JJ, Galante JO. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1130-1135.
10. Hailer NP, Garellick G, Karrholm J. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:34-41.
11. Hallan G, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Wangen H, Hol PJ, Ellison P, Havelin LI. Is there still a place for the cemented titanium femoral stem? 10,108 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:1-6.
12. Havelin LI, Robertsson O, Fenstad AM, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Furnes O. A Scandinavian experience of register collaboration: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(suppl 3):13-19.
13. Huo MH, Dumont GD, Knight JR, Mont MA. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1944-1950.
14. Jones LC, Hungerford DS. Cement disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;225:192-206.
15. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780-785.
16. McMinn DJ, Snell KI, Daniel J, Treacy RB, Pynsent PB, Riley RD. Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e3319.
17. Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Ries MD, Malchau H, Colford JM Jr. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:315-326.
18. NJR National Joint Registry. Archived annual reports. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Reports,PublicationsandMinutes/ Annualreports/Archivedannualreports/tabid/87/Default.aspx. Accessed March 13, 2013.
19. Pedersen A, Johnsen S, Overgaard S, Soballe K, Sorensen HT, Lucht U. Registration in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry: completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:434-441.
20. Soderman P. On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2000;71:1-33.
21. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Publications. Available at: http://www.shpr.se/en/Publications.aspx. Accessed March 13, 2013.
22. The New Zealand Joint Registry. Thirteen Year Report: January 1999 to December 2011. Available at: http://www.cdhb.govt.nz/njr/reports/A2D65CA3.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2013.
23. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Publications. Available at: http://nrlweb.ihelse.net/eng/default.htm#Publications. Accessed March 13, 2013.