Is there still a place for the cemented titanium femoral stem?

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-6

  Hallan, Geir ^a   Espehaug, Birgitte ^a   Furnes, Ove ^a,c   Wangen, Helge ^b   Høl, Paul J ^c   Ellison, Peter ^c   Havelin, Leif I ^a,c  

^a HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b INNLANDET HOSPITAL TRUST   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR HEAD PROSTHESIS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; NORWAY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856906857     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.645194     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Acklin Y P, Berli B J, Frick W, Elke R, Morscher E W. Nine-year results of Muller cemented titanium Straight Stems in total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121 (7): 391-8. (Pubitemid 32684977)
2. Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson K J, Kinsey T L, Mahoney O M. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (4): 414-20. (Pubitemid 40804445)
3. Baumann B, Hendrich C, Barthel T, Bockholt M, Walther M, Eulert J, Rader C P. 9-to 11-year results of cemented titanium mueller straight stem in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2007; 30 (7): 551-7. (Pubitemid 47215302)
4. Bridgens J, Davies S, Tilley L, Norman P, Stockley I. Orthopaedic bone cement: do we know what we are using? J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90 (5): 643-7. (Pubitemid 351685012)
5. Dall G F, Simpson P M, Breusch S J. In vitro comparison of Refobacin-Pala-cos R with Refobacin Bone Cement and Palacos R + G. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (3): 404-11. (Pubitemid 47027150)
6. Eingartner C, Volkmann R, Winter E, Maurer F, Ihm A, Weller S, Weise K. Results of a cemented titanium alloy straight femoral shaft prosthesis after 10 years of follow-up. Int Orthop 2001; 25 (2): 81-4. (Pubitemid 32458646)
7. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Vollset S E. The type of cement and failure of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84 (6): 832-8. (Pubitemid 34918888)
8. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Vollset S E, Kindseth O. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 2006; 77 (1): 49-56.
9. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesaeter L B, Havelin L I. 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (4): 402-12.
10. Havelin L I, Espehaug B, Vollset S E, Engesaeter L B. The effect of the type of cement on early revision of Charnley total hip prostheses. A review of eight thousand fve hundred and seventy-nine primary arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995; 77 (10): 1543-50.
11. Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie S A, Vollset S E. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (4): 337-53.
12. Langlais F, Kerboull M, Sedel L, Ling R S. The 'French paradox.'. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003; 85 (1): 17-20.
13. Lie S A, Engesaeter L B, Havelin L I, Gjessing H K, Vollset S E. Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients. Stat Med 2004; 23 (20): 3227-40. (Pubitemid 39334909)
14. McGrory B J, Morrey B F, Cahalan T D, An K N, Cabanela M E. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77 (6): 865-9.
15. Muller S D, Green S M, McCaskie A W. The dynamic volume changes of polymerising polymethyl methacrylate bone cement. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73 (6): 684-7. (Pubitemid 36020915)
16. Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 1.
17. Schemper M, Smith T L. A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 1996; 17 (4): 343-6. (Pubitemid 26342716)
18. Skinner J A, Todo S, Taylor M, Wang J S, Pinskerova V, Scott G. Should the cement mantle around the femoral component be thick or thin? J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003; 85 (1): 45-51. (Pubitemid 36196723)
19. Thien T M, Karrholm J. Design-related risk factors for revision of primary cemented stems. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (4): 407-12.
20. Willert H G, Broback L G, Buchhorn G H, Jensen P H, Koster G, Lang I, Ochsner P, Schenk R. Crevice corrosion of cemented titanium alloy stems in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop 1996; (333): 51-75. (Pubitemid 26428015)