Pediatric cardiovascular interventional devices: Effect on CMR images at 1.5 and 3 Tesla

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Khan, Sarah N ^a   Rapacchi, Stanislas ^a   Levi, Daniel S ^b   Finn, J Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Artifact; Cardiovascular; Embolization coil; Image quality; Magnetic resonance; MRA; Nitinol; Pediatric; Stainless steel; Stent

Indexed keywords

NITINOL; STAINLESS STEEL;

ADULT; AMPLATZER VASCULAR PLUG; ARTICLE; ATRIAL SEPTAL OCCLUDER; BILIARY STENT; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY PERFORATION; CORONARY STENT; EMBOLIZATION COIL; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; FONTAN PROCEDURE; HEART ATRIUM SEPTUM DEFECT; HUMAN; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; NITINOL STENT; PATENT DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS; PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPTAL OCCLUDER; STENT; SYNTHETIC FIBER; TRICUSPID VALVE ATRESIA; VASCULAR PLUG; WHOLE BODY SCANNER;

ALLOYS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICES; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PLATINUM; POLYESTERS; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SEPTAL OCCLUDER DEVICE; STAINLESS STEEL; STENTS;

EID: 84879063853     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-54     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Acceleration of cardiovascular MRI using parallel imaging: basic principles, practical considerations, clinical applications and future directions. Niendorf T, Sodickson D, Rofo 2006 178 1 15 30 10.1055/s-2005-858686 16392054 (Pubitemid 43074728)
2. Perspectives and limitations of parallel MR imaging at high field strengths. Heidemann RM, et al. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006 16 2 311 20 xi 10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.001 16731369 (Pubitemid 43792350)
3. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Hundley WG, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 55 23 2614 62 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.011 20513610
4. MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: a systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths. Klemm T, et al. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000 12 4 606 15 10.1002/1522-2586(200010) 12:4<606::AID-JMRI14>3.0.CO;2-J 11042644
5. Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents). Graf H, et al. Rofo 2003 175 12 1711 9 14661144 (Pubitemid 38019855)
6. In vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents: a pixel-by-pixel analysis using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 T. Lettau M, et al. Neuroradiology 2010 52 9 823 30 10.1007/s00234-009-0625-5 19924409
7. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. New PF, et al. Radiology 1983 147 1 139 48 6828719 (Pubitemid 13112333)
8. Smart materials applications for pediatric cardiovascular devices. Levi DS, Kusnezov N, Carman GP, Pediatr Res 2008 63 5 552 8 10.1203/PDR. 0b013e31816a9d18 18427301 (Pubitemid 351572226)
9. Three-dimensional MR angiography of a nitinol-based abdominal aortic stent graft: assessment of heating and imaging characteristics. Hilfiker PR, et al. Eur Radiol 1999 9 9 1775 80 10.1007/s003300050921 10602949
10. Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents. Lenhart M, et al. Radiology 2000 217 1 173 8 11012441 (Pubitemid 33097598)
11. Safety of implantable coronary stents during 1H-magnetic resonance imaging at 1.0 and 1.5 T. Strohm O, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1999 1 3 239 45 10.3109/10976649909088336 11554385
12. Comparative MRI compatibility of 316 L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents. Holton A, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002 4 4 423 30 12549230 (Pubitemid 36083955)
13. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 T after implantation of platinum stents: in vitro and in vivo comparison with conventional stent designs. Hagspiel KD, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005 184 1 288 94 10.2214/ajr.184.1. 01840288 15615990 (Pubitemid 40040944)
14. Artifacts in MR imaging after surgical intervention. Heindel W, et al. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986 10 4 596 9 10.1097/00004728-198607000-00009 3525623 (Pubitemid 16057310)
15. Coronary arterial stents: safety and artifacts during MR imaging. Hug J, et al. Radiology 2000 216 3 781 7 10966711 (Pubitemid 30660854)
16. Artifact-free coronary magnetic resonance angiography and coronary vessel wall imaging in the presence of a new, metallic, coronary magnetic resonance imaging stent. Spuentrup E, et al. Circulation 2005 111 8 1019 26 10.1161/01.CIR.0000156462.97532.8F 15723984 (Pubitemid 40354520)
17. Real-time cardiac cine imaging with SPIDER: steady-state projection imaging with dynamic echo-train readout. Larson AC, Simonetti OP, Magn Reson Med 2001 46 6 1059 66 10.1002/mrm.1299 11746569 (Pubitemid 33104292)
18. Magnetic resonance-guided coronary artery stent placement in a swine model. Spuentrup E, et al. Circulation 2002 105 7 874 9 10.1161/hc0702.104165 11854130 (Pubitemid 34174930)
19. Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts. Bartels LW, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA, Magn Reson Med 2002 47 1 171 80 10.1002/mrm.10004 11754456 (Pubitemid 34019706)
20. Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent. Buecker A, et al. Circulation 2002 105 15 1772 5 10.1161/01.CIR.0000015852.60212.DB 11956117 (Pubitemid 34408884)
21. High flip angle imaging of metallic stents: implications for MR angiography and intraluminal signal interpretation. van Holten J, et al. Magn Reson Med 2003 50 4 879 83 10.1002/mrm.10600 14523976 (Pubitemid 37187855)
22. MR imaging of large nonferromagnetic metallic implants at 1.5 T. Augustiny N, et al. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987 11 4 678 83 10.1097/00004728- 198707000-00024 3597894 (Pubitemid 17104774)
23. Cook Medical, [ http://www.cookmedical.com/mri.do ]