Conclusion and Perspectives: Risks and Promises of the Evidence Movement

The Evidence Book: Concepts, Generating, and Use of Evidence Comparative Policy Evaluatioon, Volume 15

Volumn 15, Issue , 2017, Pages 167-178

  Ling, Tom ^a   Leeuw, Frans L ^b,c   Rieper, Olaf ^d  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^b Statistics and Information Center   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d DANISH INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879020501     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781351298049-17     Document Type: Chapter

References (6)

1. David, M.E. (2002). “Themed section on evidence-based policy as a concept for modernising governance and social science research, " Social Policy and Society 1, 3: 213-214.
2. Davies, P. (1999). “What is evidence-based education?" British Journal of Educational Studies 47, 2: 108-21.
3. Davies, P (2004). Is Evidence-Based Government Possible? Jerry Lee Lecture, 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Washington DC.
4. Humphries, B. (2003). “What else counts as evidence in evidence-based social work?" Social Work Education 22, 1: 81-91.
5. OST (Office of Science and Technology) (2005). Guidelines on scientific analysis in policy making: a consultation by the government chief scientific adviser. London: OST.
6. Simons, H. (2004). “Utilizing Evaluation Evidence to Enhance Professional Practice.” Evaluation 10, 4: 410-429, London: Sage.