The promise of comparative administrative law: A constitutional perspective on independent agencies

Comparative Administrative Law

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 185-204

  Halberstam, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879013062     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Auby, Jean-Bernard. 2006. 'Droit administratif et démocratie', in Régulation économique et démocratie, Martine Lombard, ed., Paris: Dalloz.
2. Autin, Jean-Louis. 1997. 'Autorité administratives indépendantes', Juris-classeur administratif, Jean-Bernard Auby, ed., Binder 1 (Fasc. 75: 5), 1-18.
3. Baer, Susanne. 1999. 'Equality: The Jurisprudence of the German Constitutional Court', Columbia Journal of European Law, 5: 249-80.
4. Barron, David J. 2008. 'From Takeover to Merger: Reforming Administrative Law in an Age of Agency Politicization', George Washington Law Review, 76: 1095-152.
5. Bermann, George and Picard, Etienne. 2008. 'Administrative Law', in Introduction to French Administrative Law, George Bermann and Etienne Picard, eds., Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
6. Bishop, William. 1990. 'A Theory of Administrative Law', The Journal of Legal Studies, 10: 489-530.
7. Bloch, Susan Low and Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 2002. 'Celebrating the 200th Anniversary of the Federal Courts of the District of Columbia', Georgetown Law Journal, 90: 549-606.
8. Boucher, Philippe. 1974. '"Safari" ou la chasse aux Français', Le Monde, March 21, 9.
9. Breger, Marshall J. and Edles, Gary J. 2000. 'Established by Practice: The Theory and Operation of Independent Federal Agencies', Admininstrative Law Review, 52: 1111-294.
10. Bressman, Lisa Schultz. 2003. 'Beyond Accountability: Arbitrariness and Legitimacy in the Administrative State', NYU Law Review, 78: 461-556.
11. Brown, Neville L. and Bell, John S. 1998. French Administrative Law, 5th edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. Bulla, Simon. 2007. 'Netzregulierung - am Beispiel des Telekommunikationsrechts', in Kompendium Öffentliches Wirtschaftsrecht, 3rd edition, Reiner Schmidt and Thomas Vollmöller, eds., Berlin: Springer.
13. Calabresi, Steven G. and Prakash, Saikrishna B. 1994. 'The President's Power to Execute the Laws', Yale Law Journal, 104: 541-665.
14. Conseil d'État. 2001. 'Rapport Public 2001: Jurisprudence et avis de 2000. Les autorités administratives indépendantes', Paris: La Documentation française available at http://www.conseil-etat.fr.
15. Constant, Benjamin. 1988. 'The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns', in Political Writings, Biancamaria Fontana, ed. and trans., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Corwin, Edwin S. 1957. The President: Office and Powers 1787-1957, 4th revised edition, New York: New York University Press.
17. Croley, Steven P. 2008. Regulation and Public Interests: The Possibility of Good Regulatory Government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Currie, David P. 1989. 'Lochner Abroad: Substantive Due Process and Equal Protection in the Federal Republic of Germany', Supreme Court Review, 333-72.
19. Cushman, Robert E. 1941. The Independent Regulatory Commissions, New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Demarigny, Fabrice. 1996. 'Independent Administrative Authorities in France and the Case of the French Council of Competition', in Regulating Europe, Giandomenico Majone, ed., London: Routledge.
21. Derthick, Martha. 1976. 'Professional Fiefdoms Appraised: The Case of Social Services', Publius, 6: 121-34.
22. Dicey, A.V. 1885. Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, London: Macmillan.
23. Dicey, Albert Venn. 1915. 'The Development of Administrative Law in England', Law Quarterly Review, 31: 148-53.
24. Du Marais, Bertrand. 2008. 'Les règles juridiques materielles applicables aux autorites independantes', presented at the Centre Malher, Université Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne) (July 4-5, 2008). Forthcoming in Unabhängige Regulierungsbehörden: Organisationsrechtliche Herausforderungen in Frankreich und Deutschland, Johannes Masing and Gerard Marcou, eds., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
25. Eberle, Edward J. 2008. 'Equality in Germany and the United States', San Diego International Law Journal, 10: 63-120.
26. Favoreu, Luis. 1987. 'Les réglements autonomes n'existent pas', Revue française de droit administratif, 3: 871-84.
27. Frayssinet, Jean. 1992. Informatique, fichiers et libertés: les règles, les sanctions, la doctrine de la CNIL, Paris: Litec.
28. Frug, Gerald E. 1983. 'The Ideology of Buraucracy in American Law', Harvard Law Review, 97: 1276-388.
29. Geradin, Damien. 2004. 'Development of European Regulatory Agencies: What the EU Should Learn from American Experience', Columbia Journal of European Law, 11: 1-51.
30. Groß, Thomas. 1999. Das Kollegialprinzip in der Verwaltungsorganization, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
31. Halberstam, Daniel. 2001. 'Comparative Federalism and the Issue of Commandeering', in The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Government in the United States and the European Union, Kalypso Nicolaidis and Robert Howse, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Halberstam, Daniel. 2005. 'The Bride of Messina: Constitutionalism and Democracy in Europe', European Law Review, 30: 775-801.
33. Halberstam, Daniel. 2009. 'Constitutional Heterarchy', in Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman, eds., New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Hall, Peter. 2006. 'Introduction: The Politics of Social Change in France', in Changing France: The Politics that Markets Make, Pepper D. Culpepper, Peter A. Hall, and Bruno Palier, eds., New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
35. Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang. 2006. 'Die Eigenständigkeit der Verwaltung', in Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts, Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann, and Andreas Voßkuhle, eds., Munich: C.H. Beck.
36. Holmes, Stephen. 1984. Benjamin Constant and the Making of Modern Liberalism, New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
37. Lasser, Mitchel de S.-O.-l'E. 2004. Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy, New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Lasserre, Bruno, Lenoir, Noëlle, and Stirn, Bernard. 1987. La transparence administrative, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
39. Lemasurier, Jeanne. 1980. 'Vers une democratie administrative: du refus d'informer au droit d'être informe, Revue du droit public, 5: 1239-69.
40. Lessig, Lawrence and Sunstein, Cass R. 1994. 'The President and the Administration', Columbia Law Review, 94: 1-123.
41. Lindseth, Peter. 2004. 'The Paradox of Parliamentary Supremacy: Delegation, Democracy, and Dictatorship in Germany and France, 1920s-1950s', Yale Law Journal, 113: 1341-415.
42. Lindseth, Peter L. 2005. '"Always Embedded" Administration?: The Historical Evolution of Administrative Justice as an Aspect of Modern Governance', in The Economy as a Polity: The Political Constitution of Contemporary Capitalism, Christian Joerges, Bo Stråth, and Peter Wagner, eds., London: UCL Press.
43. Lombard, Martine. 2006. 'Introduction Générale', 'Régulation économique et démocratie, Martine Lombard, ed., Paris: Dalloz.
44. Marcou, Gérard. 2008. 'Les autorités administratives "dépendantes" et "indépendantes" dans le domaine de l'intervention économique de la puissance publique - Une analyse sur des secteurs sélectionnés', presented at the Centre Malher, Université Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne) (July 4-5, 2008). Forthcoming in Unabhängige Regulierungsbehörden: Organisationsrechtliche Herausforderungen in Frankreich und Deutschland, Johannes Masing and Gerard Marcou, eds., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
45. Mashaw, Jerry L. 2006. 'Recovering American Administrative Law: Federalist Foundations, 1787-1801', Yale Law Journal, 115: 1256-344.
46. Mashaw, Jerry L. 2008. 'Administration and "The Democracy": Administrative Law from Jackson to Lincoln, 1829-1861', Yale Law Journal, 117: 1568-693.
47. Masing, Johannes. 2008a. 'Zur Möglichkeit und Notwendigkeit übergreifender Grundsätze der Netzregulierung', in Telekommunikation, Energie, Eisenbahn: Welche Regulierung brauchen die Netzwirtschaften?, Jörn Lüdemann et al. eds., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
48. Masing, Johannes. 2008b. 'Unabhängige Behörden und ihr Aufgabenprofil', presented at the Centre Malher, Université Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne) (July 4-5, 2008). Forthcoming in Unabhängige Regulierungsbehörden: Organisationsrechtliche Herausforderungen in Frankreich und Deutschland, Johannes Masing and Gerard Marcou, eds., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
49. Mayer, Otto. 1924. Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht, vol. I., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot (reprint 2004).
50. Mayntz, Renate. 1978. Soziologie der Öffentlichen Verwaltung, Heidelberg: Müller Juristischer Verlag.
51. Miles, Thomas J. and Sunstein, Cass R. 2008. 'The Real World of Arbitrariness Review', University of Chicago Law Review, 75: 761-814.
52. Miller, Geoffrey P. 1986. 'Independent Agencies', Supreme Court Review, 1986: 41-97.
53. Moe, Terry M. 1987. 'Interests, Institutions, and Positive Theory: The Politics of the NLRB', Studies in American Political Development, 2: 236-99.
54. Möllers, Christoph. 2005. Gewaltengliederung, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
55. Möllers, Christoph. 2006. 'Methoden', in Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts, vol. 1., Wolfgang Hoffmann- Riem, Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann, and Andreas Voßkuhle, eds., Munich: C.H. Beck.
56. Möllers, Christoph. 2008. 'Materiellrechtliche Bindungen', presented at the Centre Malher, Université Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne) (July 4-5, 2008). Forthcoming in Unabhängige Regulierungsbehörden: Organisationsrechtliche Herausforderungen in Frankreich und Deutschland, Johannes Masing and Gerard Marcou, eds., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
57. Nolte, Georg, ed. 2005. European and US Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Oeter, Stefan. 1998. Integration und Subsidiarität im deutschen Bundesstaatsrecht: Untersuchungen zu Bundesstaatstheorie unter dem Grundgesetz, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
59. Philippe, Xavier. 2004. 'The Amendment of the French Constitution "on the Decentralized Organization of the Republic"', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2: 691-722.
60. Sabourin, Paul. 1983. 'Les Autorités Administratives Indépendantes: Une Catégorie Nouvelle', L'Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif, 5: 293-94.
61. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Schmidt-Aßmann, Eberhard. 1998. Das Allgemeine Verwaltungsrecht als Ordnungsidee, Berlin: Springer.
63. Shapiro, Martin. 2002. 'The Giving Reasons Requirement', in On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet, eds., New York: Oxford University Press.
64. Strauss, Peter L. 1984. 'The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch', Columbia Law Review, 84: 573-669.
65. Strauss, Peter L. 2007. 'Overseer, or "The Decider"? The President in Administrative Law', George Washington Law Review, 75: 696-760.
66. Sweet, Alec Stone. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France, New York: Oxford University Press.
67. The President's Committee on Administrative Management. 1937. 'Report of the Committee with Studies of Administrative Management in the Federal Government', reprinted in Subcommittee on Separation of Powers of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Separation of Powers and the Independent Agencies: Cases and Selected Readings, S. Doc. No. 91-49 (1969).
68. Tushnet, Mark. 1999. 'The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law', Yale Law Journal, 108: 1225-308.
69. Verkuil, Paul R. 1988. 'The Purposes and Limits of Independent Agencies', Duke Law Journal, 1988: 257-79.
70. Yoo, Christopher S., Calabresi, Steven G., and Colangelo, Anthony J. 2005. 'The Unitary Executive in the Modern Era, 1945-2004', Iowa Law Review, 90: 601-731.