Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease

Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 100-106

  Patzkowsky, Kristin E ^b   As Sanie, Sawsan ^a   Smorgick, Noam ^a   Song, Arleen H ^c   Advincula, Arnold P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Celebration Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

ADULT; FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE;

EID: 84878989937     PISSN: 10868089     EISSN: 19383797     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4293/108680812X13517013317914     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330:1478-1486.
2. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cohcrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;8:CD003677.
3. Farquhar CM, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:229-234.
4. Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nkagawa A, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1041-1048.
5. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1091-1095.
6. Advincula AP, Song AH, Burke W, Reynolds RK. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:511-518.
7. Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, Kaouk J. Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolapse (POP): utilizing POP-quantification based staging and outcomes. BJU Int. 2007;100:875-879.
8. Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadiere GB. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:1020-1023.
9. Marchal F, Rauch P, VAndromme J, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients. Surg Endosc. 2005;19: 826-831.
10. Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg. 2006; 191:555-560.
11. Boggess JF. A comparative study of three surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer; robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: 1-9.
12. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A case-control study of robotic assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph-node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199: 1-7.
13. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Motero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109:86-91.
14. Shashoua AR, Gill D, Locher SR. Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS. 2009;13(3):364-369.
15. Sarlos D, Kots LA. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:283-288.
16. Olive DL, Parker WH, Cooper JM, Levine RL. The AAGL classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7:9-15.
17. The American Fertility Society. Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: 1985. Fertil Steril. 1985; 43:351-352.
18. Diamond MP, Daniell JF, Johns DA, et al. Postoperative adhesion development after operative laparoscopy: evaluation at early second-look procedures. Operative Laparoscopy Study Group Fertil Steril. 1991;55:700-704.
19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-213.
20. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187-196.
21. Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. BJOG. 2009;116:492-500.
22. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomized trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328:129.
23. Makinen J, Johansson J, Tomas C, et al. Morbidity of 10,110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod. 2001;16: 1473-1478.
24. Hur HC, Guido RS, Mansuria SM, Hacker MR, Sanfilippo JS, Lee TT. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:311-317.
25. Hur HC, Donnellan N, Mansuria S, Barber RE, Guido R, Lee T. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:794-801.
26. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150:92-96.
27. Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, et al. Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:730-738.
28. Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, Shi G, Clarke J. Robotic surgery for benign gynaecolgical disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;15;2:CD008978.