Temporal regularity in speech perception - Is regularity beneficial or deleterious?

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

Volumn 14, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Geiser, Eveline ^a   Shattuck Hufnagel, Stefanie ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; INTERNATIONAL PHONETIC ALPHABET; LANGUAGE LEARNING; PILOT STUDIES; SECOND LANGUAGE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RHYTHM;

AUDITION; LINGUISTICS;

SPEECH SYNTHESIS;

EID: 84878981586     PISSN: 1939800X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1121/1.4707937     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2. Arvaniti, A. (2009). Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm. Phonetica, 66, 46-63.
3. Barnes, R. , & Jones, M. R. (2000). Expectancy, attention, and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41(3), 254-311.
4. Chapin, H. , Zanto, T. P. , Jantzen, K. J. , kelso, J. A. S. , Steinberg, F. , & Large, E. W. (2010). Neural responses to complex auditory rhythms: The role of attending. Frontiers in Auditory Cognitive Neurosicence, 1, 224.
5. Cowan, N. , Saults, J. S. , Elliott, E. M. , & Moreno, M. V. (2002). Deconfounding serial recall. Journal ofMemory and Language, 46, 153-177.
6. Cutler, A. (1996). Prosody and the word boundary problem. InJ. L. Morgan, & K. Demuth (Eds. ), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 87-100)
7. Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 5-62.
8. Dilley, L. C. , & McAuley, D. (2008). Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing. Journal ofMemory and Language, 59, 294-311.
9. Ellis, R. J. , & Jones, M. R. (2010). Rhythmic context modulates foreperiod effects. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2274-2288.
10. Geiser, E. , Zaehle, T. , Jancke, L. , & Meyer, M. (2008). The neural correlate of speech rhythm as evidenced by metrical speech processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 541-552.
11. Geiser, E. , Notter, M. , & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (in press). A cortico-striatal neural system enhances auditory perception through temporal context processing. Journal of Neuroscience.
12. Grabe, E. , & Low, E. L. (2002). Acoustic correlates of rhythm class. In C. Gussenhoven, & N. Warner (Eds. ), Laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 515-546). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
13. Jones, M. R. , Moynihan, H. , MacKenzie, N. , & Puente, J. (2002). Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychological Science, 13(4), 313-319.
14. Kochanski, G. , Grabe, E. , Coleman, J. , & Rosner, B. (2005). Loudness predicts prominence: Fundamental frequency lends little. The Journal of the Acoustical Society ofAmerica, 118(2), 1038-1054.
15. London, J. M. (2004). Hearing in time: Psychological aspects of musical meter. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
17. Nazzi, T. , & Ramus, F. (2003). Perception and acquisition of linguistic rhythm by infants. Speech Communication, 41(1), 233-243.
18. Norton, A. , Zipse, L. , Marchina, S. , & Schlaug, G. (2009). Melodic intonation therapy: Shared insights on how it is done and why it might help. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1169, 431-436.
19. Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
20. Schlaug, G. , Norton, A. , Marchina, S. , Zipse, L. , & Wan, C. Y. (2011). From singing to speaking: Facilitating recovery from nonfluent aphasia. Future Neurology, 5(5), 657665.
21. Snedeker, J. , & Casserly, E. (2010). Is it all relative? effects of prosodic boundaries on the comprehension and prduction of attachment ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7-9), 1234-1264.
22. Sahl, B. , Kotz, S. A. , Henseler, I. , Turner, R. , & Geyer, S. (2011). Rhythm in disguise: Why singing may not hold the key to recovery from aphasia. Brain, 134, 3083-3093.