Is it all relative? effects of prosodic boundaries on the comprehension and production of attachment ambiguities

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1234-1264

  Snedeker, Jesse ^a   Casserly, Elizabeth ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comprehension; Intonational boundaries; Parsing; Prepositional phrase attachment; Production; Prosody; Syntactic ambiguity resolution

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

EID: 77957767376     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960903525499     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allbritton, D., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1996). Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 714-735. doi:10.1.1.122.4
2. Altmann, G. T. M. (1998). Ambiguity in sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(4), 146-152. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01153-X
3. Baumann, S. (2005, September). Degrees of givenness and their prosodic marking. Paper presented at the international symposium on Discourse and prosody as a complex interface, Aix-en-Provence.
4. Beach, C. M. (1991). The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 644-663. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90030-N
5. Beckman, M. E. (1996). The parsing of prosody. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11, 17-67. doi:10.1080/016909696387213
6. Beckman, M. E., & Hirschberg, J. (1994). The ToBI annotation conventions. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
7. Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255-309.
8. Carlson, K., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (2001). Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory & Language, 45(1), 58-81. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2762
9. Clifton, C. Jr., Carlson, K., & Frazier, L. (2002). Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech, 45, 87-114.
10. Cooper, W. E., & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language & Speech, 40(2), 141-201.
12. Fernald, A., & McRoberts, G. (1996). Prosodic bootstrapping: A critical analysis of the argument and the evidence. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax (pp. 365-388). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Ferreira, F. (1988). Planning and timing in sentence production: The syntax-to-phonology conversion. Unpublished dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
14. Gee, J. P., & Grosjean, F. (1983). Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 411-458.
15. Kjelgaard, M. M., & Speer, S. R. (1999). Prosodic facilitaion and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 153-194. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2620
16. Kraljic, T., & Brennan, S. E. (2005). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? Cognitive Psychology, 50(2), 194-231.
17. Lee, E.-K., & Watson, D. (2008, March). Effects of focal accents on relative clause attachment: Accent effects or memory effects? Poster presented at the 21st annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Chapel Hill, NC.
18. Lehiste, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa, 7, 102-122.
19. Lehiste, I., Olive, J. P., & Streeter, L. A. (1976). Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 1199-1202.
20. Marcus, M., & Hindle, D. (1990). Description theory and intonation boundaries. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Computational and psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 483-512). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., & Lee, C. S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 73-87. doi:10.1080/14640749208401316s
22. Nagel, H. N., Shapiro, L. P., Tuller, B., & Nawy, R. (1996). Prosodic influences on the resolution of temporary ambiguity during on-line sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 319-344.
23. Nespor, M. A., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Boston: Kluwer.
24. Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271-311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Price, P., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2956-2970.
26. Pynte, J., & Prieur, B., (1996). Prosodic breaks and attachment decisions in sentence parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 165-192. doi:10.1080/016909696387259
27. Schafer, A., Carter, J., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1996). Focus in relative clause construal. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(1/2), 135-163. doi:10.1080/016909696387240
28. Schafer, A., Speer, S., & Warren, P. (2005). Prosodic influences on the production and comprehension of syntactic ambiguity in a game-based conversation task. In J. C. Trueswell & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world situated language use (pp. 209-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Schafer, A., Speer, S., Warren, P., & White, S. (2000). Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 169-182.
30. Schafer, A. J. (1997). Prosodic parsing: The role of prosody in sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
31. Selkirk, E. O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371-405.
32. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. E. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 193-247.
33. Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 103-130.
34. Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3), 238-299.
35. Steedman, M. (2000). Information structure and syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649-689.
36. Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain responses indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 191-196.
37. Warren, P. (1999). Prosody and sentence processing. In S. Garrod & M. Pickering (Eds.), Language processing (pp. 155-188). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
38. Warren, P., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (1995). Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 457-486. doi:10.1080/01690969508407112
39. Watson, D., & Gibson, E. (2004). The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 713-755. doi:10.1080/01690960444000070
40. Watson, D., & Gibson, E. (2005). Intonational phrasing and constituency in language production and comprehension. Studia Linguistica, 59, 279-300.
41. Weber, A., Grice, M., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements. Cognition, 99, B63-B72. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.001