Visualizing the elusive open shape of G-actin in solution by SAXS data analysis

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Volumn 435, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 740-744

  Sagar, Amin ^a   Peddada, Nagesh ^a   Solanki, Ashish k ^a   Choudhary, Vikas ^a   Garg, Renu ^a   Ashish, ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Actin; ATP hydrolysis; Shape change; Small angle X ray scattering

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BETA ACTIN; G ACTIN; GLOBULAR PROTEIN; HEXOKINASE; NUCLEOTIDE; PROFILIN;

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; BREAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA ANALYSIS; HYDROLYSIS; KRATKY ANALYSIS; LIGHT SCATTERING; MUSCLE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE BINDING SITE; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PARTICLE SIZE; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ACTINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SCATTERING, SMALL ANGLE; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 84878974693     PISSN: 0006291X     EISSN: 10902104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.05.055     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Belmont L.D., Orlova A., et al. A change in actin conformation associated with filament instability after P-i release. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96(1):29-34.
2. Carlier M.F., Jean C., et al. Modulation of the interaction between G-actin and Thymosin-Beta-4 by the Atp Adp Ratio - possible implication in the regulation of actin dynamics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90(11):5034-5038.
3. Carlier M.F., Laurent V., et al. Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF/cofilin) enhances the rate of filament turnover: implication in actin-based motility. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 136(6):1307-1322.
4. Chik J.K., Lindberg U., et al. The structure of an open state of beta-actin at 2.65 angstrom resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 263(4):607-623.
5. Crosbie R.H., Miller C., et al. Structural connectivity in actin: effect of C-terminal modifications on the properties of actin. Biophys. J. 1994, 67(5):1957-1964.
6. Garg R., Peddada N., et al. Visual insight into how low pH alone can induce actin-severing ability in gelsolin under calcium-free conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286(23):20387-20397.
7. Gerstein M., Lesk A.M., et al. Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. Biochemistry 1994, 33(22):6739-6749.
8. Kabsch W., Mannherz H.G., et al. Atomic-structure of the actin - Dnase-I complex. Nature 1990, 347(6288):37-44.
9. Konarev P.V., Volkov V.V., et al. PRIMUS: a Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36:1277-1282.
10. Kozin M.B., Svergun D.I. Automated matching of high- and low-resolution structural models. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2001, 34:33-41.
11. Pantaloni D., Carlier M.F. How profilin promotes actin filament assembly in the presence of Thymosin-Beta-4. Cell 1993, 75(5):1007-1014.
12. Pantaloni D., Carlier M.F., et al. The critical concentration of actin in the presence of ATP increases with the number concentration of filaments and approaches the critical concentration of actin.ADP. J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259(10):6274-6283.
13. Pollard T.D., Blanchoin L., et al. Molecular mechanisms controlling actin filament dynamics in nonmuscle cells. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2000, 29:545-576.
14. Rould M.A., Wan Q., et al. Crystal structures of expressed non-polymerizable monomeric actin in the ADP and ATP states. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281(42):31909-31919.
15. Sablin E.P., Dawson J.F., et al. How does ATP hydrolysis control actin's associations?. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99(17):10945-10947.
16. 2+. FEBS Lett. 1987, 217(1):89-93.
17. Sheterline P., Clayton J., et al. Actin. Protein Profile 1995, 2(1):1-103.
18. Spudich J.A., Watt S. The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246(15):4866-4871.
19. Strzelecka-Golaszewska H., Moraczewska J., et al. Localization of the tightly bound divalent-cation-dependent and nucleotide-dependent conformation changes in G-actin using limited proteolytic digestion. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993, 211(3):731-742.
20. Svergun D.I. Determination of the regularization parameter in Indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1992, 25:495-503.
21. Svergun D.I., Petoukhov M.V., et al. Determination of domain structure of proteins from X-ray solution scattering. Biophys. J. 2001, 80(6):2946-2953.
22. Volkov V.V., Svergun D.I. Uniqueness of ab initio shape determination in small-angle scattering. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36:860-864.
23. Wriggers W., Schulten K. Stability and dynamics of G-actin: back-door water diffusion and behavior of a subdomain 3/4 loop. Biophys. J. 1997, 73(2):624-639.