Competitive Victimhood Among Jewish and Palestinian Israelis Reflects Differential Threats to their Identities: The Perspective of the Needs-Based Model

Restoring Civil Societies: The Psychology of Intervention and Engagement Following Crisis

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 192-207

  Shnabel, Nurit ^a   Noor, Masi ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b CANTERBURY CHRIST CHURCH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Competitive victimhood, and groups engagement; Jewish and Palestinian Israelis, and competitive victimhood; Jews Palestinians in Israeli society, and the dynamics manifested; Needs based model of reconciliation; Needs based model to contexts of competitive victimhood; Reconciliation in a complex, unclassifiable context; Restoring civil societies, crisis and emotional barriers; Road to restoration in civil societies, and "constructive dialogue"; Satisfying needs, restoring victims' sense of power; The Kefar Kasem killings, roles of victims perpetrators

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878965240     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118347683.ch11     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Adwan, S., & Bar-On, D. (2004). Shared history project: a PRIME example of peace-building under fire. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 17, 513-525.
2. Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430-1453.
3. Bekerman, Z. (2002). The discourse of nation and culture: Its impact on Palestinian-Jewish encounters in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 409-427.
4. Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248-264.
5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1961). The mirror-image in Soviet-American relations. Journal of Social Issues, 3, 45-56.
6. Christie, D. J., Tint, B. S., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. D. (2008). Peace psychology for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 63, 543-552.
7. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.
8. Friedman, J. D., & Austin, W. G. (1978). Observers' reactions to an innocent victim: Effect of characterological information and degree of suffering. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 569-574.
9. Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2008). Transforming trauma in the aftermath of gross human rights abuses: Making public spaces intimate through the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 57-75). New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Gopin, M. (2004). Healing the heart of conflict: 8 crucial steps to making peace with yourself and others. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Books.
11. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505-520.
12. Kelman, H. C. (2008). Reconciliation from a social-psychological perspective. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 15-32). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249.
14. Leunissen, J. M., De Cremer, D., & Reinders Folmer, C. P. (2012). An instrumental perspective on apologizing in bargaining. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 215-222.
15. Lynch, J., & Galtung, J. (2010). Reporting conflict: New directions in peace journalism. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
16. Manzi, J., & Gonzalez, R. (2007). Forgiveness and reparation in Chile: The role of cognitive and emotional intergroup antecedents. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13, 71-91.
17. Nadler, A. (2002). Postresolution processes: Instrumental and socioemotional routes to reconciliation. In G. Salomon & B. Nevo (Eds.), Peace education: The concept, principles, and practices around the world (pp. 127-141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary's expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients' trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459-470.
19. Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. (2008). Instrumental and socioemotional paths to intergroup reconciliation and the needs-based model of socioemotional reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37-56). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Noor, M., Brown, R. J., & Prentice, G. (2008a). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 481-495.
21. Noor, M., Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Manzi, G., & Lewis, C. A. (2008b). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 819-832.
22. Noor, M., Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Nadler, A. (in press). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
23. Philpot, C., & Hornsey, M. J. (2011). Memory for intergroup apologies and its relationship with forgiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 96-106.
24. Poundstone, W. (1992). Prisoner's dilemma: John von Neumann, game theory and the puzzle of the bomb. New York: Doubleday.
25. Scheff, T. J. (1994). Bloody revenge: Emotions, nationalism, and war. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26. Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group member: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021-1030.
27. Sonnenschein, N. (2008). An identity challenging dialogue [in Hebrew]. Haifa: Pardes Publishing.
28. Staub, E. (2008). Promoting reconciliation after genocide and mass killing in Rwanda and other post-conflict settings. In Nadler, A., Malloy, T., and Fisher, J. D. (Eds), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 395-422). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30. Zitek, E. M., Jordan, A. H., Monin, B., & Leach, F. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 245-255.