Renormalization group running of dimension-six sources of parity and time-reversal violation

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Dekens, W ^a   De Vries, J ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b NIKHEF   (Netherlands)

^c FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; CP violation; Renormalization Group

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878944691     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2013)149     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics, Annals Phys. 318 (2005) 119 [ hep-ph/0504231 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 40829794)
2. G. 't Hooft, Symmetry breaking through Bell-Jackiw anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 8 [ INSPIRE ].
3. G. 't Hooft, Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 3432 [Erratum ibid. D 18 (1978) 2199] [ INSPIRE ].
4. R.J. Crewther, P. Di Vecchia, G. Veneziano and E. Witten, Chiral estimate of the electric dipole moment of the neutron in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 88 (1979) 123 [Erratum ibid. B 91 (1980) 487] [ INSPIRE ].
5. C.A. Baker et al., An improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 131801 [ hep-ex/0602020 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 44477070)
6. RD. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440 [ INSPIRE ].
7. O. Naviliat-Cuncic and R.G.E. Timmermans, Electric dipole moments: flavor-diagonal cp violation, Compt. Rend. Phys. 13 (2012) 168.
8. T.M. Ito, Plans for a neutron EDM experiment at SNS, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 69 (2007) 012037 [ nucl-ex/0702024 ] [ INSPIRE ].
9. CryoEDM collaboration, M. van der Grinten et al., CryoEDM: a cryogenic experiment to measure the neutron electric dipole moment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 611 (2009) 129 [ INSPIRE ].
10. I. Altarev et al., Towards a new measurement of the neutron electric dipole moment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 611 (2009) 133 [ INSPIRE ].
11. W. Griffith et al., Improved limit on the permanent electric dipole moment of Hg-199, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 101601 [ INSPIRE ].
12. V.F. Dmitriev and R.A. Sen'kov, Schiff moment of the mercury nucleus and the proton dipole moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 212303 [ nucl-th/0306050 ] [ INSPIRE ].
13. F.J.M. Farley et al., A New method of measuring electric dipole moments in storage rings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 052001 [ hep-ex/0307006 ] [ INSPIRE ].
14. Y.F. Orlov, W.M. Morse and Y.K. Semertzidis, Resonance method of electric-dipole-moment measurements in storage rings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 214802 [ hep-ex/0605022 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 43837749)
15. C.J.G. Onderwater, Search for EDMs using storage rings, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 295 (2011) 012008 [ INSPIRE ].
16. Storage Ring EDM collaboration, Y.K. Semertzidis, A Storage Ring proton electric dipole moment experiment: most sensitive experiment to CP-violation beyond the Standard Model, arXiv:1110.3378 [ INSPIRE ].
17. C.J.G. Onderwater, Search for electric dipole moments at storage rings, arXiv:1204.2512 [ INSPIRE ].
18. J. Pretz, Measurement of permanent electric dipole moments of charged hadrons in storage rings, Hyperfine Interactions 214 (2013), no. 1-3 111-117 [ arXiv:1301.2937 ] [ INSPIRE ].
19. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [ INSPIRE ].
20. S. Weinberg, Larger Higgs exchange terms in the neutron electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 2333 [ INSPIRE ].
21. A. De Rujula, M.B. Gavela, O. Pene and F.J. Vegas, Signets of CP-violation, Nucl. Phys. B 357 (1991) 311 [ INSPIRE ].
22. M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and S. Su, Low energy precision test of supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 456 (2008) 1 [ hep-ph/0612057 ] [ INSPIRE ].
23. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [ arXiv:1008.4884 ] [ INSPIRE ].
24. F. Wilczek and A. Zee, ΔI = 1/2 rule and right-handed currents: heavy quark expansion and limitation on Zweig's rule, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2660 [ INSPIRE ].
25. E. Braaten, C.-S. Li and T.-C. Yuan, The evolution of Weinberg's gluonic CP-violation operator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 1709 [ INSPIRE ].
26. G. Degrassi, E. Franco, S. Marchetti and L. Silvestrini, QCD corrections to the electric dipole moment of the neutron in the MSSM, JHEP 11 (2005) 044 [ hep-ph/0510137 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. H. An, X. Ji and F. Xu, P-odd and CP-odd four-quark contributions to neutron EDM, JHEP 02 (2010) 043 [ arXiv:0908.2420 ] [ INSPIRE ].
28. J. Hisano, K. Tsumura and M.J.S. Yang, QCD corrections to neutron electric dipole moment from dimension-six four-quark operators, Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 473 [ arXiv:1205.2212 ] [ INSPIRE ].
29. O. Lebedev, K.A. Olive, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Probing CP-violation with the deuteron electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 016003 [ hep-ph/0402023 ] [ INSPIRE ].
30. J. de Vries, R.G.R. Timmermans, E. Mereghetti and U. van Kolck, The nucleon electric dipole form factor from dimension-six time-reversal violation, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 268 [ arXiv:1006.2304 ] [ INSPIRE ].
31. S. Narison, A fresh look into the neutron EDM and magnetic susceptibility, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 455 [ arXiv:0806.2618 ] [ INSPIRE ].
32. K. Ottnad, B. Kubis, U.-G. Meissner and F.-K. Guo, New insights into the neutron electric dipole moment, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 42 [ arXiv:0911.3981 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. E. Mereghetti, J. de Vries, W. Hockings, C. Maekawa and U. van Kolck, The electric dipole form factor of the nucleon in chiral perturbation theory to sub-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 97 [ arXiv:1010.4078 ] [ INSPIRE ].
34. J. de Vries, E. Mereghetti, R.G.E. Timmermans and U. van Kolck, Parity- and time-reversal-violating form factors of the deuteron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 091804 [ arXiv:1102.4068 ] [ INSPIRE ].
35. J. de Vries et al., Electric dipole moments of light nuclei from chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 065501 [ arXiv:1109.3604 ] [ INSPIRE ].
36. J. de Vries, E. Mereghetti, R.G.E. Timmermans and U. van Kolck, The effective chiral lagrangian from dimension-six parity and time-reversal violation, arXiv:1212.0990 [ INSPIRE ].
37. A.V. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral quarks and the nonrelativistic quark model, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 189 [ INSPIRE ].
38. W. Fischler, S. Paban and S.D. Thomas, Bounds on microscopic physics from P and T violation in atoms and molecules, Phys. Lett. B 289 (1992) 373 [ hep-ph/9205233 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. J. Bsaisou et al., The electric dipole moment of the deuteron from the QCD θ-term, Eur. Phys. J. A 31 (2013) 49 [ arXiv:1209.6306 ] [ INSPIRE ].
40. C.-P. Liu and R. Timmermans, Time-reversal violation in threshold vector-n vector-p scattering, Phys. Lett. B 634 (2006) 488 [ nucl-th/0602010 ] [ INSPIRE ].
41. Y.-H. Song, R. Lazauskas and V. Gudkov, Time reversal invariance violation in neutron deuteron scattering, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 065503 [ arXiv:1104.3051 ] [ INSPIRE ].
42. E. Shintani et al., Neutron electric dipole moment from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 014504 [ hep-lat/0505022 ] [ INSPIRE ].
43. F. Berruto, T. Blum, K. Orginos and A. Soni, Calculation of the neutron electric dipole moment with two dynamical flavors of domain wall fermions, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 054509 [ hep-lat/0512004 ] [ INSPIRE ].
44. E. Shintani, S. Aoki and Y. Kuramashi, Full QCD calculation of neutron electric dipole moment with the external electric field method, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 014503 [ arXiv:0803.0797 ] [ INSPIRE ].
45. F.-K. Guo and U.-G. Meissner, Baryon electric dipole moments from strong CP-violation, JHEP 12 (2012) 097 [ arXiv:1210.5887 ] [ INSPIRE ].
46. T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano and R. Gupta, Neutron electric dipole moment from beyond the standard model, PoS(LATTICE 2012)179.
47. th Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum, October 8-12, Garching, Germany (2012).
48. E. Braaten, C.S. Li and T.C. Yuan, The gluon color-electric dipole moment and its anomalous dimension, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 276 [ INSPIRE ].
49. J. Ng and S. Tulin, D versus d: CP-violation in β decay and electric dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 033001 [ arXiv:1111.0649 ] [ INSPIRE ].
50. -, Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 253 [ INSPIRE ].
51. D.B. Kaplan and A. Manohar, Strange matrix elements in the proton from neutral current experiments, Nucl. Phys. B 310 (1988) 527 [ INSPIRE ].
52. C. Grojean, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group scaling of Higgs operators and Γ(h- > γγ), JHEP 04 (2013) 016 [ arXiv:1301.2588 ] [ INSPIRE ].
53. S.M. Barr and A. Zee, Electric dipole moment of the electron and of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 21 [Erratum ibid. 65 (1990) 2920] [ INSPIRE ].
54. D. Chang, X.-G. He, W.-Y. Keung, B. McKellar and D. Wyler, Neutron electric dipole moment due to Higgs exchange in left-right symmetric models, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 3876 [ hep-ph/9209284 ] [ INSPIRE ].
55. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [ INSPIRE ].
56. Y. Zhang, H. An, X. Ji and R.N. Mohapatra, General CP-violation in minimal left-right symmetric model and constraints on the right-handed scale, Nucl. Phys. B 802 (2008) 247 [ arXiv:0712.4218 ] [ INSPIRE ].
57. F. Xu, H. An and X. Ji, Neutron electric dipole moment constraint on scale of minimal left-right symmetric Model, JHEP 03 (2010) 088 [ arXiv:0910.2265 ] [ INSPIRE ].
58. S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields, volume 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1996).
59. V. Bernard, N. Kaiser and U.G. Meissner, Chiral dynamics in nucleons and nuclei, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 4 (1995) 193 [ hep-ph/9501384 ] [ INSPIRE ].
60. E. Mereghetti, W. Hockings and U. van Kolck, The effective chiral lagrangian from the theta term, Annals Phys. 325 (2010) 2363 [ arXiv:1002.2391 ] [ INSPIRE ].
61. E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Baryon chiral perturbation theory using a heavy fermion Lagrangian, Phys. Lett. B 255 (1991) 558 [ INSPIRE ].
62. V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, J. Kambor and U.G. Meissner, Chiral structure of the nucleon, Nucl. Phys. B 388 (1992) 315 [ INSPIRE ].
63. C. Dib et al., The neutron electric dipole form-factor in the perturbative chiral quark model, J. Phys. G 32 (2006) 547 [ hep-ph/0601144 ] [ INSPIRE ].
64. M. Pospelov, Best values for the CP odd meson nucleon couplings from supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 530 (2002) 123 [ hep-ph/0109044 ] [ INSPIRE ].
65. D.A. Demir, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Hadronic EDMs, the Weinberg operator and light gluinos, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 015007 [ hep-ph/0208257 ] [ INSPIRE ].
66. C. Arzt, M. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Patterns of deviation from the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 433 (1995) 41 [ hep-ph/9405214 ] [ INSPIRE ].
67. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, On gauge invariance and minimal coupling, arXiv:1305.0017 [ INSPIRE ].
68. F. Boudjema, K. Hagiwara, C. Hamzaoui and K. Numata, Anomalous moments of quarks and leptons from nonstandard W W gamma couplings, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 2223 [ INSPIRE ].
69. D. McKeen, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Modified Higgs branching ratios versus CP and lepton flavor violation, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 113004 [ arXiv:1208.4597 ] [ INSPIRE ].
70. J. Fan and M. Reece, Probing charged matter through Higgs diphoton decay, γ ray lines and EDMs, arXiv:1301.2597 [ INSPIRE ].
71. - at LEP 2, Eur. Phys. J. C 54 (2008) 345 [ arXiv:0801.1235 ] [ INSPIRE ].
72. D0 collaboration, S. Abachi et al., Limits on anomalous WWγ couplings from TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3634 [ hep-ex/9612002 ] [ INSPIRE ].
73. J.J. Hudson et al., Improved measurement of the shape of the electron, Nature 473 (2011) 493 [ INSPIRE ].