Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in studies that match controls to cases on covariates

Academic Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 863-873

  Pepe, Margaret Sullivan ^a,b   Fan, Jing ^a   Seymour, Christopher W ^c,d  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Case control study; Classification; Diagnostic test; Logistic regression; Risk prediction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SIMULATION;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84878941771     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gur D., Bandos A.I., Rockette H.E., et al. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?. Acad Radiol 2010, vol. 17(5):639-645.
2. Samuelson F., Gallas B.D., Myers K.J., et al. The importance of ROC data. Acad Radiol 2011, vol. 18:257-258.
3. Barlow W.E., Chi C., Carney P.A., et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004, vol. 96(24):1840-1850.
4. Pepe M., Fan J., Seymour C., et al. Biases introduced by choosing controls to match risk factors of cases in biomarker research. Clin Chem 2012, vol. 58:1242-1251.
5. Janes H., Pepe M.S. Matching in studies of classification accuracy: implications for analysis, efficiency, and assessment of incremental value. Biometrics 2008, vol. 64(1):1-9.
6. Janes H., Pepe M.S. Adjusting for covariates in studies of diagnostic, screening, or prognostic markers: an old concept in a new setting. Am J Epidemiol 2008, vol. 168:89-97.
7. Tosteson A.N., Begg C.B. A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation. Med Decis Making 1988, vol. 8(3):204-215.
8. Faraggi D. Adjusting receiver operating characteristic curves and related indices for covariates. J R Stat Soc Ser D 2003, vol. 52(2):179-192.
9. Zhou X.-H., Obuchowski N.A., McClish D.K. Regression analysis for independent ROC data. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine 2011, 261-296. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
10. Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Bruns D.E., et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Radiol 2003, vol. 58(8):575-580.
11. Pepe M.S., Feng Z., Janes H., et al. Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008, vol. 100(20):1432-1438.
12. Huang Y., Pepe M. Biomarker evaluation and comparison using the controls as a reference population. Biostatistics 2009, vol. 10(2):228.
13. Morris D.E., Pepe M.S., Barlow W.E. Contrasting two frameworks for ROCanalysis of ordinal ratings. Med Decis Making 2010, vol. 30(4):484-498.
14. Pepe M.S. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results. Biometrics 1998, vol. 54(1):124-135.
15. Janes H., Longton G., Pepe M. Accommodating covariates in ROC analysis. Stata J 2009, vol. 9(1):17-39.
16. Janes H., Pepe M.S. Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate-adjusted ROC curve. Biometrika 2009, vol. 96:371-382.
17. Kerr K.F., Pepe M.S. Joint modeling, covariate adjustment, and interaction: contrasting notions in risk prediction models and risk prediction performance. Epidemiology 2011, vol. 22(6):805-812.
18. Pepe M.S. The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
19. Seymour C.W., Kahn J.M., Cooke C.R., et al. Prediction of critical illness during out-of-hospital emergency care. JAMA 2010, vol. 304(7):747-754.
20. Parikh C.R., Devarajan P., Zappitelli M., et al. Postoperative biomarkers predict acute kidney injury and poor outcomes after pediatric cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011, vol. 22(9):1737-1747.