Contrasting two frameworks for ROC analysis of ordinal ratings

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 484-498

  Morris, Daryl E ^a   Pepe, Margaret Sullivan ^a   Barlow, William E ^b  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

comparisons; covariates; diagnostic test; markers; ordinal regression; percentile values

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 77954913406     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09357477     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Swets JA, Pickett RM Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods from Signal Detection Theory. New York: Academic Press ; 1982.
2. Metz CE Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiologic ROC studies. Invest Radiol. 1989 ; 24: 234-245.
3. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley ; 1990.
4. Dorfman DD, Alf E. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals-rating method data. J Math Psychol. 1969 ; 6: 487-496.
5. Tosteson AAN, Begg CB A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation. Med Decis Making. 1988 ; 8: 204-215.
6. Ishwaran H., Gatsonis CA A general class of hierarchical ordinal regression models with applications to correlated ROC analysis. Can J Stat. 2000 ; 28: 731-750.
7. Pepe MS, Feng Z., Janes H., Bossuyt P., Potter J. Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2008 ; 100: 1432-1438.
8. Pepe MS The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003.
9. Pepe MS, Longton G., Janes H. Estimation and comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves. Stata J. 2009 ; 9: 1-16.
10. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: Mammography. 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology ; 2003.
11. Barlow WE, Chi C., Carney PA, et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 ; 1840-1850.
12. Janes H., Pepe MS Adjusting for covariates in studies of diagnostic, screening or prognostic markers: an old concept in a new setting. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 ; 168: 89-97.
13. Janes H., Pepe MS Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate adjusted ROC curve. Biometrika. 2009 ; 96: 383-398.
14. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing ; 2008.
15. Gonen M. Analyzing Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves With SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Publishing ; 2007.
16. Alonzo TA, Pepe MS Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques. Biostatistics. 2002 ; 3: 421-432.
17. Pepe MS, Cai T. The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures. Biometrics. 2004 ; 60: 528-535. (Pubitemid 38780215)
18. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP ; 2007.
19. Janes H., Longton G., Pepe M. Accommodating covariates in ROC analysis. Stata J. 2009 ; 9: 17-39.
20. Casella G., Berger R. Statistical Inference. 2 nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole ; 2002.
21. Pepe MS Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results. Biometrics. 1998 ; 54: 124-135.
22. Zheng YY, Barlow WE, Cutter G. Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation. Biometrics. 2005 ; 61: 259-268.