'Why do these people's opinions matter?' Positioning known referents as unnameable others

Discourse Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 299-317

  Jackson, Clare ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complaints; conversation analysis; demonstrative pronouns; membership categories; person reference; social distance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878935745     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: 14617080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445613480587     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Atkinson B.Lucifer's fiasco: Lawyers, liars, and L'affaire Lewinsky.Fordham Law Review. 1999;68 (3): 567-611.
2. Auer JCP.Referential problems in conversation.Journal of Pragmatics. 1984;8:627-648.
3. Couper-Kuhlen E,Selting MStudies in Interactional Linguistics. Selting MCouper-Kuhlen E, ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2001:.
4. Diessel HDemonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins; 1999:.
5. Diessel H.Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar.Cognitive Linguistics. 2006;17 (4): 463-489.
6. Drew P.Complaints about transgressions and misconduct.Research on Language and Social Interaction. 1998;31:295-325.
7. Drew PThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Sidnell JStivers T, ed. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2012:13-149.
8. Edwards DIdentities in Talk. Antaki CWiddicombe S, ed. London: SAGE; 1998:.
9. Enfield NJ.Demonstratives in space and interaction: Data from Lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis.Language. 2003;79 (1): 82-117.
10. Enfield NJPerson Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives. Enfield NStivers T, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:97-120.
11. Fillmore CFLectures on Deixis. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information; 1997:.
12. Lexis and Syntax in Conversation: Studies on the Uses of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction. Hakulinen ASelting M, ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2005:.
13. Hanks WF.Explorations in the deictic field.Current Anthropology. 2005;46 (2): 191-220.
14. Heritage J.The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content.Journal of Pragmatics. 2002;34:1427-1446.
15. Jackson CGender and Conversation. Speer SAStokoe EH, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011:31-47.
16. Jarbou SO.Accessibility vs. physical proximity: An analysis of exophoric demonstrative practice in Spoken Jordanian Arabic.Journal of Pragmatics. 2010;42 (11): 3078-3097.
17. Kessler SLessons from the Intersexed. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1998:.
18. Kessler SJ,McKenna WGender: An Ethnomethodolgical Approach. New York: Wiley; 1978:.
19. Kitzinger C.Is 'woman' always relevantly gendered?.Gender and Language. 2007;1 (1): 39-49.
20. Levinson SCThe Handbook of Pragmatics. Horn LWard G, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2004:97-121.
21. Lyons JSemantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977:.
22. Mail Online (2010) Gordon won't be getting my vote: Gillian Duffy reveals what REALLY upset her about that devastating exchange with PM. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1270337/Gordon-wont-getting-vote-Gillian-Duffy-reveals-REALLY-upset-devastating-exchange-PM.html (accessed 27 September 2012).
23. Marchello-Nizia C.Deixis and subjectivity: The semantics of demonstratives in Old French (9th-12th century).Journal of Pragmatics. 2005;37 (1): 43-68.
24. Oh S-YPerson Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Enfield NJStivers T, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:203-225.
25. Quirk R,Greenbaum SA Concise Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman; 1973:.
26. Rawnsley AThe End of the Party: The Rise and Fall of New Labour. London: Viking; 2010:.
27. Sacks HDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Gumperz JJHymes D, ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1972a:325-345.
28. Sacks HStudies in Social Interaction. Sudnow DN, ed. New York: Free Press; 1972b:31-74.
29. Sacks HLectures on Conversation. ed. Jefferson G. Oxford: Blackwell; 1992:.
30. Sacks H,Schegloff EAEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Psathas G, ed. New York: Irvington; 1979:15-21.
31. Schegloff EAStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Atkinson JMHeritage J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984:28-52.
32. Schegloff EAStudies in Anaphora. Fox B, ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1996:437-485.
33. Stein A.A symposium on the Clinton-Lewinsky affair: Clinton, the rightwing, and 'civilized' sexual morality. Sexualities; 1999; 1999. 247.
34. Stivers TPerson Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Enfield NJStivers T, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:73-96.
35. Stivers T,Enfield NJ,Levinson SCPerson Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Enfield NJStivers T, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:1-20.
36. Stockill C,Kitzinger C.Gendered people: How linguistically non-gendered terms can have gendered interactional relevance.Feminism & Psychology. 2007;17:224-236.
37. Stokoe EHGender and Conversation. Speer SAStokoe EH, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011:85-111.