The effect of design on the usability and real world effectiveness of medical devices: A case study with adolescent users

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 799-810

  Lang, Alexandra R ^a   Martin, Jennifer L ^a   Sharples, Sarah ^a   Crowe, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Effectiveness; Medical devices; Usability; User requirements

Indexed keywords

DESIGN;

ADOLESCENTS; EFFECTIVENESS; MEDICAL DEVICES; USABILITY; USER REQUIREMENTS;

BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BREATHING EXERCISE; CASE STUDY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYSTIC FIBROSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MEDICAL DEVICE; PHYSIOTHERAPY DEVICE; SCHOOL CHILD; THERAPY EFFECT;

EID: 84878900433     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Barter C., Renold E. 'I wanna tell you a story': exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2000, 3(4):307-323.
2. Brumby D., Davies S., et al. Fast or safe? how performance objectives determine modality output choices while interacting on the move. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2011, 473-482. ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
3. Carter B. Tick box for child? the ethical positioning of children as vulnerable, researchers as barbarians and reviewers as overly cautious. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009, 46:858-864.
4. CF Trust What causes cystic fibrosis? Retrieved 06.08.11 from:. http://www.cftrust.org.uk/aboutcf/whatiscf/whatcausescf/.
5. Chittaro L. Distinctive aspects of mobile interaction and their implications for the design of multimodal interfaces. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 2010, 3(3):157-165.
6. Craven, M.P., Lang, A.R., Martin, J.L., Sharples, S., 2010. Evaluation of features of blood glucose meters influencing correct use and adherence to self-monitoring of type II diabetics. In: Proceedings of 7th Annual Conference of the International Society for Health Technology Assessment. Dublin, Ireland, 6th-9th June.
7. Erikson E.H. Identity: Youth and Crisis 1968, Norton, New York.
8. FDA Medical Devices: Home Use Devices 2012, Last updated 06/22/2012. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/HomeHealthandConsumer/HomeUseDevices/default.htm.
9. Feng X., Winters J.M. An interactive framework for personalized computer-assisted neurorehabilitation. Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions 2007, 11(5):518-526.
10. Fielding D., Duff A. Compliance with treatment protocols: interventions for children with chronic illness. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1999, 80:196-200.
11. Garmer K., Liljegren E., Oswalder A.L., Dalman S. Application of usability testing to the development of medical equipment. Usability testing of a frequently used infusion pump and a new user interface for an infusion pump developed with a human factors approach. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2002, 29:145-159.
12. Geljins A.C., Killelea B., Vitale M., Mankad V., Moskowitz A. The dynamics of pediatric device innovation: putting evidence in context. Safe Medical Devices for Children 2005, 302-326. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. M.J. Field, H. Tilson (Eds.).
13. Gibbs G.R. Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with NVivo 2002, Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK, (Chapter 4).
14. Gore F.P., Bloem P.J.M., et al. Global burden of disease in young people aged 10-24 years: a systematic analysis. The Lancet 2011, 377(9783):2093-2102.
15. Hahn C. Coding In Doing Qualitative Research Using Your Computer: a Practical Guide 2008, Chapter 8, SAGE Publications Inc, London, Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi.
16. Han Y., Yun T.J., Abowd G.D., Arriaga R.I. How to design persuasive health technologies for adolescents with chronic illness? in workshop papers - personal informatics in practice: improving quality of life through data. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) Austin 2012, ACM, Texas, 5-10 May 2012.
17. Holmbeck G.N. Adevelopmental perspective on adolescent health and illness: an introduction to the special issues. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2002, 27(5):409-416.
18. Hristara-Papadopoulou A., Tsanakas J., Diomou G., Papadopoulou O. Current devices of respiratory physiotherapy. Hippokratika 2008, 12(4):211-220.
19. Hyman W.A., Privitera M.B. Looking Good Matters for Devices Too: Aesthetics Shouldn't be an Afterthought When Designing Medical Devices. Product Development Insight 2005, Retrieved 10/04/09.
20. ISO ISO 14971:2007 Medical Devices - Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices 2007, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
21. ISO ISO 62366: 2008 Medical Devices - Application of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices 2008, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
22. Kharrazi H., Faiola A., Defazio J. Healthcare game design: behavioral modeling of serious gaming design for children with chronic diseases. Human-Computer Interaction 2009, 5613:335-344. Interacting in Various Application Domains. J. Jacko. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
23. Kyngäs H. Compliance of adolescents with chronic disease. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2000, 9(4):549-556.
24. Lang, A.R., 2012. Medical Device Design for Adolescents. Doctoral thesis. University of Nottingham, UK, March 2012.
25. Lang A.R., Martin J.L., Sharples S., Crowe J. AQualitative Assessment ofMedical Device Design by Healthy Adolescents. Advances in HumanFactors and Ergonomics in Healthcare 2010, CRC Press, Indiana, USA, pp. 539-548.
26. Macadam C., Barnett J., Roberts G., Stiefel G., King R., Erlewyn-Lajeunesse M., Holloway J., Lucas J. What factors affect the carriage of epinephrine auto-injectors by teenagers?. Clinical and Translational Allergy 2012, 2:3.
27. Martin J.L., Murphy E., Crowe J.A., Norris B.J. Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics. Physiological Measurement 2006, 27:49-62.
28. Martin J.L., Norris B.J., Murphy E., Crowe J.A. Medical device development: the challenge for ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics 2008, 39(3):271-283.
29. McCormick J., Green M.W., Mehta G., Culross F., Mehta A. Demographics of the UK cystic fibrosis population: implications for neonatal screening. European Journal of Human Genetics 2002, 10:583-590.
30. McDonagh J.E. The adolescent challenge. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2000, 15:1761-1765.
31. ® Fit Plus. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2012, 7(3):205-210.
32. Michaud P.A., Suris J.C., Viner R. The Adolescent with a Chronic Condition: Epidemiology, Developmental Issues and Health Care Provision 2007, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
33. Money A., Barnett J., Kuljis J., Craven M.P., Martin J.L., Young T. The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2011, 11(1):15.
34. Montague E.N.H., Woodrow W.W., Kleiner B.M. Empirically understanding trust in medical technology. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2009, 39(4):628-634.
35. Montague E.N.H., Woodrow W.W., Kleiner B.M. Trust in medical technology by patients and healthcare providers in obstetric work systems. Behaviour & Information Technology 2010, 29(5):541-554.
36. Mugge R., Schoormans J., et al. Emotional bonding with personalised products. Journal of Engineering Design 2009, 20(5):467-476.
37. NHS Cystic Fibrosis 2010, Retrieved 01.05.11, from:. http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Cystic-fibrosis.
38. NHS Using Your Acapella: A Patients Guide 2011, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge.
39. Nielsen J. Heuristic evaluation. Usability Inspection Methods 1994, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. J. Nielsen, R.L. Mack (Eds.).
40. Orenstein D.M. Cystic Fibrosis. A Guide for Patient and Family 2004, vol. 189-196. Lippencott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia PA, pg xi, pp. 235-252. third ed.
41. Patton G.C., Coffey C., et al. Global patterns of mortality in young people: a systematic analysis of population health data. The Lancet 2009, 374:881-892.
42. Pendleton D.A., David T.J. The compliance conundrum in cystic fibrosis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2000, 93(Suppl. 38):9-13.
43. Sampada M., Sundar S.S. What drives customization? control or identity?. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) 2011, 781-790. ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7-12 May 2011.
44. Sawyer D. Do It by Design: an Introduction to Human Factors in Medical Devices. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration 1996, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
45. Sawyer S.M., Afifi R.A., Bearinger L.H., Blakemore S.J., Dick B., Ezeh A.C., Patton G.C. Adolescence: a foundation for future health. The Lancet 2012, 379(9826):1630-1640.
46. Seale C., Silverman D. Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. European Journal of Public Health 1997, 7(4):379-384.
47. Sharples S., Martin J.L., Lang A.R., Craven M.P., O'Neill S., Barnett J. Medical Device Design in Context: a Model of User-device Interaction and Consequences 2012, Displays. Online 05/01/12.
48. Slagle M., Gordon J., et al. My MediHealth - designing a next generation system for child-centered medication management. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2010, 43(Suppl. 5):S27-S31.
49. Suris J.C., Michaud P.A., Viner R. The adolescent with a chronic condition. Part I: developmental issues. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2004, 89:938-942.
50. Suris J.C., Michaud P.A., Akre C., Sawyer S.M. Health risk behaviors in adolescents with chronic conditions. Pediatrics 2008, 122(5):1113-1118.
51. Thom D.H., Ribisl K.M., Stewart A.L., Luke D.A. Further validation and reliability testing of the trust in physician scale. Medical Care 1999, 37(5):510-517.
52. Tice J.A., Helfand M., Feldman M.D. Clinical Evidence for Medical Devices: Regulatory Processes Focusing on Europe and the United States of America. WH0/HSS/EHT/DIM/10.3. Background Paper 3 of the Priority Medical Devices Project 2010, World Health Organization, Geneva, August 2010.
53. van Dulman S., van Sluijs E.M.F., van Dijk L., de Ridder D., Heerdink R., Bensing J. Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews. BMC Health Services Research 2007, 7(1):55.
54. van Slujis E.M.F., McMinn A.M., Griffin S.J. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials. BMJ 2007, 335(7622):703.
55. Vergara M., Page Á. Relationship between comfort and back posture and mobility in sitting-posture. Applied Ergonomics 2002, 33(1):1-8.
56. Vermeire E., Hearnshaw H., Van Royen P., Denekens J. Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2001, 26:331-342.
57. Viner R.C., Coffey C., et al. 50-year mortality trends in children and young people: a study of 50 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries. The Lancet 2011, 377(9772):1162-1174.
58. Volsko T.A., DiFiore J., Chatburn R.L. Performance comparison of two oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices: acapella versus flutter. Respiratory Care 2003, 48(2):124-130.
59. WHO The Second Decade: Improving Adolescent Health and Development 2001, World Health Organization, Geneva.
60. WHO Medical Device Regulations Global Overview and Guiding Principles 2003, World Health Organisation, Geneva.
61. Wilks T. The use of vignettes in qualitative research into social work values. Qualitative Social Work 2004, 3(1):78-87.
62. Winters J.M., Winters J.M. Atelehomecare model for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 2004, 10(2):200-212.