Effects of land-use change on the carbon balance of 1st generation biofuels: An analysis for the European Union combining spatial modeling and LCA

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 56, Issue , 2013, Pages 166-178

  Humpenöder, Florian ^a,b   Schaldach, Rüdiger ^a   Cikovani, Yalda ^c   Schebek, Liselotte ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

^b POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biofuels; European Union; GHG emissions; Land use change; LCA; Spatial model

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; GHG EMISSION; LAND-USE CHANGE; LCA; SPATIAL MODELS;

CARBON; FOSSIL FUELS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIFE CYCLE;

BIOFUELS;

BIOFUEL; CARBON BALANCE; CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; EUROPEAN UNION; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE CHANGE; NUMERICAL MODEL;

EID: 84878843743     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. European Parliament and Council Directive 2009/28/EC of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. OJ L 2009, 140:1-52.
2. Ecofys Biofuels baseline 2008 Available from:, [accessed 21.09.12]. http://www.ecofys.com/en/publication/biofuels-baseline-2008/.
3. ISO 14040 Environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework 1996, International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
4. Geyer R., Stoms D., Lindner J., Davis F., Wittstock B. Coupling GIS and LCA for biodiversity assessments of land use. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2010, 15:454-467.
5. Lange M. The GHG balance of biofuels taking into account land use change. Energy Policy 2011 May, 39:2373-2385.
6. Ponti L., Gutierrez A.P. Overview on biofuels from a European perspective. B Sci Technol Soc 2009 Nov 13, 29:493-504.
7. Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R.A., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., et al. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008 Feb 29, 319:1238-1240.
8. IEA Technology roadmap: biofuels for transport 2011, International Energy Agency.
9. UK RFA The Gallagher review of the indirect effects of biofuels production 2008, UK Renewable Fuels Agency.
10. Logan T.J., Lal R., Dick W.A. Tillage systems and soil properties in North America. Soil Tillage Res 1991 Jun, 20:241-270.
11. Bowyer C. Anticipated indirect land use change associated with expanded use of biofuels and bioliquids in the EU - an analysis of the national renewable energy action plans 2011, 1-24. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP).
12. European Commission National renewable energy action plans (NREAPs) Available from:, [accessed 19.09.12]. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/action_plan_en.htm.
13. DG Energy The impact of land use change on greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels and bioliquids 2010, 5-8. Directorate-General for Energy of the European Commission.
14. Schaldach R., Alcamo J., Koch J., Kölking C., Lapola D.M., Schüngel J., et al. An integrated approach to modelling land-use change on continental and global scales. Environ Modell Softw 2011 Aug, 26:1041-1051.
15. Schaldach R., Priess J.A., Alcamo J. Simulating the impact of biofuel development on country-wide land-use change in India. Biomass Bioenerg 2011 Jun, 35:2401-2410.
16. Brinkman N., Wang M., Weber T., Darlington T. Well-to-wheels analysis of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - a North American study of energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and criteria pollutant emissions 2005, 11. Argonne National Laboratory.
17. Lapola D.M., Schaldach R., Alcamo J., Bondeau A., Koch J., Koelking C., et al. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010 Feb 8, Available from:, [accessed 18.02.13]. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/02/02/0907318107.
18. Turner B.L., Lambin E.F., Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 Dec 26, 104:20666-20671.
19. EEA Corine land cover 2000 2007, European Environment Agency, Available from:, [accessed 15.07.11]. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/corine-land-cover-2000-clc2000-250-m-version-9-2007.
20. Bondeau A., Smith P.C., Zaehle S., Schaphoff S., Lucht W., Cramer W., et al. Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Glob Change Biol 2007, 13:679-706.
21. Eastman J.R., Jin W., Kyem P.A.K., Toledano J. Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogram Eng Remote Sensing 1995 May, 61:539-547.
22. FAO FAO statistical database 2011, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Available from:, [accessed 11.07.11]. http://faostat.fao.org.
23. Pontius R.G., Schneider L.C. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2001 Jun, 85:239-248.
24. Mayer D.G., Butler D.G. Statistical validation. Ecol Model 1993 Jul, 68:21-32.
25. Loague K., Green R.E. Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. J Contam Hydrol 1991 Jan, 7:51-73.
26. Schaldach R., Alcamo J. Coupled simulation of regional land use change and soil carbon sequestration: a case study for the state of Hesse in Germany. Environ Modell Softw 2006 Oct, 21:1430-1446.
27. Alcamo J. Environmental futures: the practice of environmental scenario analysis 2008, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston.
28. CESR Background document on scenarios for the project climate adaptation - modelling water scenarios and sectoral impacts 2010, Center for Environmental Systems Research, Available from:, [accessed 24.09.12]. http://www.climwatadapt.eu/scenarios.
29. Kok K., Van Vliet M., Bärlund I., Sendzimir J., Dubel A. First ("first-order") draft of pan-European storylines-results from the second pan-European stakeholder workshop 2009, 2. SCENES Deliverable.
30. Fischer G., Shah M., Tubiello F.N., van Velhuizen H. Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990-2080. Philos Trans R Soc B 2005 Nov 29, 360:2067-2083.
31. Fischer G., Prieler S., Van Velthuizen H., Lensink S.M., Londo M., De Wit M. Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part I: land productivity potentials. Biomass Bioenerg 2010 Feb, 34:159-172.
32. FAPRI US and world agricultural outlook 2010, 326. Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute.
33. FAS U EU annual biofuels report 2010, 1-38. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.
34. FNR Basisdaten Bioenergie Deutschland 2012, Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V., Available from:, [accessed 26.09.12]. http://mediathek.fnr.de/broschuren/bioenergie/biokraftstoffe/basisdaten-bioenergie.html.
35. Johnston M., Foley J.A., Holloway T., Kucharik C., Monfreda C. Resetting global expectations from agricultural biofuels. Environ Res Lett 2009 Jan, 4:014004.
36. European Commission Impact of the EU biofuel target on agricultural markets and land use 2011, European Commission, Luxemburg. 1st ed.
37. Kavalov B. Biofuels potential in the EU 2004, 24. European Commission Joint Research Centre.
38. JRC Support to renewable energy directive 2011, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Available from:, [accessed 07.07.11]. http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/RenewableEnergy.
39. European Commission Commission decision of 10 June 2010 on guidelines for the calculation of land carbon stocks for the purpose of annex V to Directive 2009/28/EC. OJ L 2010, 151:19-41.
40. IPCC IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories 2006, vol. 4:5.17-5.37. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
41. BioGrace Biograce Excel greenhouse gas emission calculation tool 2012, Intelligent Energy Europe Programme, Available from:, [accessed 19.09.12]. http://www.biograce.net/content/ghgcalculationtools/overview.
42. Alberici S., Hamelinck C., Schueler V. Annotated example of a land carbon stock calculation using standard values 2010, 1-14. ECOFYS.
43. Bringezu S., O'Brien M., Schütz H. Beyond biofuels: assessing global land use for domestic consumption of biomass: a conceptual and empirical contribution to sustainable management of global resources. Land Use Policy 2012 Jan, 29:224-232.
44. McKone T.E., Nazaroff W.W., Berck P., Auffhammer M., Lipman T., Torn M.S., et al. Grand challenges for life-cycle assessment of biofuels. Environ Sci Technol 2011 Mar 1, 45:1751-1756.
45. Cherubini F., Strømman A.H. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour Technol 2011 Jan, 102:437-451.
46. 2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 2007 Aug 1, 7:11191-11205.