Long-term economic impact of coiling vs clipping for unruptured intracranial aneurysms

Neurosurgery

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1000-1011

  Lad, Shivanand P ^a   Babu, Ranjith ^a   Rhee, Michael S ^c   Franklin, Robbi L ^c   Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ^c   Hodes, Jonathan ^c   Nimjee, Shahid M ^a   Zomorodi, Ali R ^a   Smith, Tony P ^b   Friedman, Allan H ^a   Patil, Chirag G ^d   Boakye, Maxwell ^e  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^d CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiogram; Clipping; Coiling; Complications; Endovascular; Healthcare cost; Reoperation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOVASCULAR CLIPPING; ENDOVASCULAR COILING; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; UNITED STATES; UNRUPTURED INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM;

ADULT; AGED; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84878832537     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000429284.91142.56     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms-risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(24):1725-1733.
2. Ahn JY, Han IB, Yoon PH, et al. Clipping vs coiling of posterior communicating artery aneurysms with third nerve palsy. Neurology. 2006;66(1):121-123.
3. Barker FG II, Amin-Hanjani S, Butler WE, et al. Age-dependent differences in shortterm outcome after surgical or endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996-2000. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(1):18-28.
4. Bellebaum C, Schafers L, Schoch B, et al. Clipping versus coiling: neuropsychological follow up after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004;26(8):1081-1092.
5. Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, et al. Quality of life after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms by neurosurgical clipping or by embolisation with coils. A prospective, observational study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17(1):44-52.
6. Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke. 2007;38(5):1538-1544.
7. Rates of delayed rebleeding from intracranial aneurysms are low after surgical and endovascular treatment. Stroke. 2006;37(6):1437-1442.
8. Chan A, Ho S, Poon WS. Neuropsychological sequelae of patients treated with microsurgical clipping or endovascular embolization for anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Eur Neurol. 2002;47(1):37-44.
9. Chen PR, Amin-Hanjani S, Albuquerque FC, McDougall C, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Outcome of oculomotor nerve palsy from posterior communicating artery aneurysms: comparison of clipping and coiling. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(6): 1040-1046; discussion 1040-1046.
10. Cowan JA Jr, Ziewacz J, Dimick JB, Upchurch GR Jr, Thompson BG. Use of endovascular coil embolization and surgical clip occlusion for cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(3):530-535.
11. de Oliveira JG, Beck J, Setzer M, et al. Risk of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after occlusion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms by surgical clipping or endovascular coiling: a single-institution series and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(5):924-933.
12. Fontanella M, Perozzo P, Ursone R, Garbossa D, Bergui M. Neuropsychological assessment after microsurgical clipping or endovascular treatment for anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003;145(10):867-872.
13. Frazer D, Ahuja A, Watkins L, Cipolotti L. Coiling versus clipping for the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a longitudinal investigation into cognitive outcome. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(3):434-441.
14. Groden C, Regelsberger J, Neumaier-Probst E, Grzyska U, Herrmann HD, Zeumer H. Operative or endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial vertebral artery aneurysms? Neuroradiology. 2000;42(9):685-691.
15. Gruber DP, Zimmerman GA, Tomsick TA, van Loveren HR, Link MJ, Tew JM Jr. A comparison between endovascular and surgical management of basilar artery apex aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(5):868-874.
16. Helland CA, Krakenes J, Moen G, Wester K. A population-based study of neurosurgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured, intracranial aneurysms in a small neurosurgical unit. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(6):1168-1175.
17. Koivisto T, Vanninen R, Hurskainen H, Saari T, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A prospective randomized study. Stroke. 2000;31(10):2369-2377.
18. Lusseveld E, Brilstra EH, Nijssen PC, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with a ruptured basilar tip aneurysm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(5):591-593.
19. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9342): 1267-1274.
20. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366(9488):809-817.
21. Nagashima H, Kobayashi S, Tanaka Y, Hongo K. Endovascular therapy versus surgical clipping for basilar artery bifurcation aneurysm: retrospective analysis of 117 cases. J Clin Neurosci. 2004;11(5):475-479.
22. Qureshi AI, Janardhan V, Hanel RA, Lanzino G. Comparison of endovascular and surgical treatments for intracranial aneurysms: an evidence-based review. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(9):816-825.
23. Taha MM, Nakahara I, Higashi T, et al. Endovascular embolization vs surgical clipping in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: morbidity and mortality with shortterm outcome. Surg Neurol. 2006;66(3):277-284; discussion 284.
24. van der Schaaf I, Algra A, Wermer M, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD003085.
25. Vanninen R, Koivisto T, Saari T, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: acute endovascular treatment with electrolytically detachable coils-a prospective randomized study. Radiology. 1999;211(2):325-336.
26. Halkes PH, Wermer MJ, Rinkel GJ, Buskens E. Direct costs of surgical clipping and endovascular coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(1):40-45.
27. Wolstenholme J, Rivero-Arias O, Gray A, et al. Treatment pathways, resource use, and costs of endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping after aSAH. Stroke. 2008; 39(1):111-119.
28. Javadpour M, Jain H, Wallace MC, Willinsky RA, ter Brugge KG, Tymianski M. Analysis of cost related to clinical and angiographic outcomes of aneurysm patients enrolled in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial in a North American setting. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(5):886-894.
29. Maud A, Lakshminarayan K, Suri MF, Vazquez G, Lanzino G, Qureshi AI. Costeffectiveness analysis of endovascular versus neurosurgical treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. J Neurosurg. 2009;110(5):880-886.
30. Woodworth GF, Baird CJ, Garces-Ambrossi G, Tonascia J, Tamargo RJ. Inaccuracy of the administrative database: comparative analysis of two databases for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(2):251-256.
31. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613-619.
32. Hoh BL, Chi YY, Dermott MA, Lipori PJ, Lewis SB. The effect of coiling versus clipping of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms on length of stay, hospital cost, hospital reimbursement, and surgeon reimbursement at the university of Florida. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(4):614-619.
33. Hoh BL, Chi YY, Lawson MF, Mocco J, Barker FG II. Length of stay and total hospital charges of clipping versus coiling for ruptured and unruptured adult cerebral aneurysms in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database 2002 to 2006. Stroke. 2010;41(2):337-342.
34. Brennan JW, Schwartz ML. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: appraisal of the literature and suggested recommendations for surgery, using evidence-based medicine criteria. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(6):1359-1371.
35. Weir B. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a review. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(1):3-42.
36. Johnston SC, Dudley RA, Gress DR, Ono L. Surgical and endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms at university hospitals. Neurology. 1999;52(9): 1799-1805.
37. Johnston SC, Zhao S, Dudley RA, Berman MF, Gress DR. Treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in California. Stroke. 2001;32(3):597-605.
38. Bairstow P, Dodgson A, Linto J, Khangure M. Comparison of cost and outcome of endovascular and neurosurgical procedures in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Australas Radiol. 2002;46(3):249-251.