Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus neurosurgical treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States: Clinical article

Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 110, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 880-886

  Maud, Albertoz ^a   Lakshminarayan, Kamakshi ^a   Suri, M Fareed K ^a   Vazquez, Gabriela ^a   Lanzino, Giuseppe ^b   Qureshi, Adnan I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost effective analysis; Endovascular coil placement; Intracranial aneurysm; Neurosurgical treatment; Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANEURYSM CLIP; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; ANEURYSM SURGERY; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DISABILITY; ECONOMICS; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROSURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETREATMENT; STROKE; SURGICAL APPROACH; UNITED STATES; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; ANEURYSM, RUPTURED; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 66849129549     PISSN: 00223085     EISSN: 19330693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2008.8.JNS0858     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bairstow P, Dodgson A, Linto J, Khangure M: Comparison of cost and outcome of endovascular and neurosurgical procedures in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Australas Radiol 46:249-251, 2002 (Pubitemid 35013775)
2. Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, Summers PE, Kerr RS, Sneade M, et al: Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 38: 1538-1544, 2007 (Pubitemid 46684171)
3. Fenwick E, Marshall DA, Levy AR, Nichol G: Using and interpreting cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of management strategies for atrial fibrillation. BMC Health Serv Res 6:52, 2006 (Pubitemid 44219742)
4. Gage BF, Cardinalli AB, Albers GW, Owens DK: Cost-effectiveness of warfarin and aspirin for prophylaxis of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. JAMA 274:1839-1845, 1995
5. Harbaugh RE, Heros RC, Hadley MN: More on ISAT. Lancet 361:783-784, 2003
6. Javadpour M, Jain H, Wallace MC, Willinsky RA, ter Brugge KG, Tymianski M: Analysis of cost related to clinical and angiographic outcomes of aneurysm patients enrolled in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial in a North American setting. Neurosurgery 56:886-894, 2005 (Pubitemid 40628074)
7. Johnston SC, Gress DR, Kahn JG: Which unruptured cerebral aneurysms should be treated? A cost-utility analysis. Neurology 52:1806-1815, 1999
8. Kallmes DF, Kallmes MH, Lanzino G, Kassell NF, Jensen ME, Helm GA: Routine angiography after surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a cost versus benefit analysis. Neurosurgery 41:629-641, 1997 (Pubitemid 27383201)
9. Mandelblatt JS, Fryback DG, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR: Assessing the effectiveness of health interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. J Gen Intern Med 12:551-558, 1997
10. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimp ton J, et al: International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:1267-1274, 2002 (Pubitemid 35284616)
11. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, et al: International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366: 809-817, 2005 (Pubitemid 41557380)
12. Premier's Perspective Comparative Database: Charlotte, NC. USA, 2006 (http://www.premierinc.com) [Accessed 6 August 2007]
13. Qureshi AI, Hutson AD, Harbaugh RE, Stieg PE, Hopkins LN: Methods and design considerations for randomized clinical trials evaluating surgical or endovascular treatments for cerebrovascular diseases. Neurosurgery 54:248-264, 2004
14. Qureshi AI, Janardhan V, Hanel RA, Lanzino G: Comparison of endovascular and surgical treatments for intracranial aneurysms: an evidence-based review. Lancet Neurol 6:816-825, 2007 (Pubitemid 47238677)
15. Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Nasar A, Kirmani JF, Ezzeddine MA, Divani AA, et al: Changes in cost and outcome among US patients with stroke hospitalized in 1990 to 1991 and those hospitalized in 2000 to 2001. Stroke 38:2180-2184, 2007
16. Rasanen P, Roine E, Sintonen H, Semberg-Konttinen V, Ryynanen OP, Roine R: Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: a systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 22:235-241, 2006
17. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J III, Meissner I, Brown RD Jr, Piepgras DG, et al: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 362:103-110, 2003 (Pubitemid 36831019)
18. Wolstenholme J, Rivero-Arias O, Gray A, Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yarnold JA, et al: Treatment pathways, resource use, and costs of endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping after aSAH. Stroke 39:111-119, 2008