Workplace-based assessment in surgical training: Experiences from the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 448-453

  Eardley, Ian ^a,b   Bussey, Maria ^a   Woodthorpe, Adrian ^b   Munsch, Chris ^b   Beard, Jonathan ^c  

^a ISCP   (Australia)

^b ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ISCP; Surgical training; Workplace based assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SURGERY; UNITED KINGDOM; WORKPLACE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPECIALTIES, SURGICAL; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84878803567     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ans.12187     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chesser S, Bowman K, Phillips H. The European Working Time Directive and the training of surgeons. BMJ 2002; 325: S69-70.
2. Bates T, Cecil E, Greene I. The effect of the EWTD on training in general surgery: an analysis of electronic logbook records. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. (Suppl.) 2007; 89: 106-109.
3. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 2007; 77: 81-112.
4. Smith R. All changed, changed utterly. BMJ 1998; 316: 1917-1918.
5. General Medical Council. Standards for curricula and assessment systems. [Cited 2010.] Available from URL: http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/postgraduate/standards_for_curricula_and_assessment_systems.asp
6. Department of Health. Modernising Medical Careers. [Cited 2003.] Available from URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4054233.pdf
7. Norcini J, Blank L, Duffy D, Fortna G. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann. Intern. Med. 2003; 138: 476-481.
8. Pitts D, Rowley DI, Sher JL. Assessment of performance in orthopaedic training. J. Bone Joint Surg. 2005; 87: 1187-1191.
9. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. Guidance for doctors. [Cited 2006.] Available from URL: http://www.ub.edu/medicina_unitateducaciomedica/documentos/Good_Medical_Practice.pdf
10. Eraut M. The Eraut report. [Cited 2008.] Available from URL: http://www.mee.nhs.uk/pdf/FinalReportISCP%20-%20MichaelEraut.pdf.
11. Kogan J, Holmboe E, Hauer K. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. JAMA 2009; 302: 1316-1326.
12. Davies H, Archer J, Southgate L, Norcini J. Initial evaluation of the first year of the Foundation Programme. Med. Educ. 2009; 43: 74-81.
13. Elstein A, Shulman L. Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
14. Crossley J, Humphris G, Jolly B. Assessing health professionals. Med. Educ. 2002; 36: 800-804.
15. Rethans JJ, Sturmans F, Drop R, van der Vleuten C, Hobus P. Does competence of general practitioners predict their performance? Comparison between examination setting and actual practice. BMJ 1991; 303: 1377-1380.
16. Beard JD, Jolly BC, Newble DI, Thomas WEG, Donnelly J, Southgate LJ. Assessing the technical skills of surgical trainees. Br. J. Surg. 2005; 92: 778-782.
17. Marriot J, Purdie H, Crossley J, Beard J. A prospective observational study to evaluate procedure based assessment (PBA) for assess trainee's procedural skills in the operating theatre. Br. J. Surg. 2011; 98: 450-457.
18. Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, Reeves S, Barr H. Critical Review of Evaluations of Interprofessional Education. London: Higher Education Academy Learning and Teaching Support Netwrok for Health Sciences and Practice, 2002. [Cited 2002.] Available from URL: http://www.health.ltsn.ac.uk/publications/occasionalpaper/occasionalpaper02.pdf
19. Crossley J, Johnson G, Booth J, Wade W. Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales. Med. Educ. 2011; 45: 560-569.