Single-tooth implants with different neck designs: A randomized clinical trial evaluating the aesthetic outcome

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 311-321

  den Hartog, Laurens ^a   Raghoebar, Gerry M ^a   Slater, James J Huddleston ^a   Stellingsma, Kees ^a   Vissink, Arjan ^a   Meijer, Henny J A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Dental implant; Esthetics; Implant neck; Single tooth; Soft tissue

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FEMALE; GINGIVA; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLA; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGERY; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; AUTOGRAFTS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; GINGIVA; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; TITANIUM; TOOTH LOSS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84878783821     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00372.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Den Hartog L, Slater JJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35:1073-1086.
2. Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol 2009; 80:140-151.
3. Annibali S, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Cristalli MP. Usefulness of the aesthetic result as a success criterion for implant therapy: a review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009 [Epub ahead of print].
4. Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM. A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues-the implant crown aesthetic index. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:645-649.
5. Bengazi F, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7:303-310.
6. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997; 68:1117-1130.
7. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:559-571.
8. Laurell L, Lundgren D. Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: a meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13:19-28.
9. Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:465-470.
10. Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:827-832.
11. Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun HJ. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:789-794.
12. Wohrle PS. Nobel Perfect esthetic scalloped implant: rationale for a new design. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5 (Suppl 1):64-73.
13. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Liddelow G, Henry P, Goodacre CJ. Periimplant tissue response following immediate provisional restoration of scalloped implants in the esthetic zone: a one-year pilot prospective multicenter study. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97:S109-S118.
14. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Worthington HV. Agreement of quantitative subjective evaluation of esthetic changes in implant dentistry by patients and practitioners. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:309-315.
15. Levi A, Psoter WJ, Agar JR, Reisine ST, Taylor TD. Patient self-reported satisfaction with maxillary anterior dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:113-120.
16. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23:313-323.
17. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Patients LNP. satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:185-193.
18. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987; 2:145-151.
19. Smeets EC, de Jong KJ, Abraham-Inpijn L. Detecting the medically compromised patient in dentistry by means of the medical risk-related history. A survey of 29, 424 dental patients in The Netherlands. Prev Med 1998; 27:530-535.
20. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
21. Den Hartog L, Raghoebar GM, Stellingsma K, Meijer HJ. Immediate loading and customized restoration of a single implant in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102:211-215.
22. Meijndert L, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. A technique for standardized evaluation of soft and hard peri-implant tissues in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol 2004; 75:646-651.
23. Choquet V, Hermans M, Adriaenssens P, Daelemans P, Tarnow DP, Malevez C. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region. J Periodontol 2001; 72:1364-1371.
24. Romeo E, Lops D, Rossi A, Storelli S, Rozza R, Chiapasco M. Surgical and prosthetic management of interproximal region with single-implant restorations: 1-year prospective study. J Periodontol 2008; 79:1048-1055.
25. Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, etal. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol 2009; 80:152-162.
26. Cho HL, Lee JK, Um HS, Chang BS. Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010; 40:188-193.
27. Buser D, Wittneben J, Bornstein MM, Grütter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Stability of contour augmentation and esthetic outcomes of implant supported single crowns in the esthetic zone. 3-Year results of a prospective study with early implant placement post extraction. J Periodontol 2010 [Epub ahead of print].
28. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Dierens M, De Rouck T. Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010 [Epub ahead of print].
29. Meijndert L, Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM. Evaluation of aesthetics of implant-supported single-tooth replacements using different bone augmentation procedures: a prospective randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:715-719.
30. Schropp L, Isidor F, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Patient experience of, and satisfaction with, delayed-immediate vs. delayed single-tooth implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:498-503.
31. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32:212-218.
32. Chang M, Odman PA, Wennstrom JL, Andersson B. Esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements assessed by the patient and by prosthodontists. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12:335-341.
33. Gehrke P, Degidi M, Lulay-Saad Z, Dhom G. Reproducibility of the implant crown aesthetic index-rating aesthetics of single-implant crowns and adjacent soft tissues with regard to observer dental specialization. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11:201-213.