Widget manipulation revisited: A case study in modeling interactions between experimental conditions

IPT-EGVE 2007 - 13th Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments, 10th Immersive Projection Technology Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 53-60

  Martens, Jean Bernard ^a   Kok, Arjan ^a   Van Liere, Robert ^a,b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b CWI   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Interaction; Virtual environments; Widgets

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; INTERACTION; INTERACTION EFFECT; MANIPULATION TASK; MODELING INTERACTIONS; SPATIAL INTERACTION; STEREOSCOPIC VIEWING; WIDGETS;

DESIGN; ISOMERS; OPTICAL PROJECTORS; RESEARCH; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84878741874     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. ALIAKSEYEU D., MARTENS J., SUBRAMANIAN S., VROUBEL M., WESSELINK W.: Visual interaction platform. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 01 (2001), pp. 232-239.
2. ARSENAULT R., WARE C.: The importance of stereo and eye coupled perspective for eye-hand coordination in fish tank vr. Presence 13 (2004), 549-559.
3. BROOKS F.: What's real about virtual reality? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 19, 6 (Nov./Dec. 1999), 16-27.
4. DRAPER N. R., SMITH H.: Applied Regression Analysis. Wiley-Interscience Publication, 1998.
5. FEINER S., MACINTYRE B., HAUPT M., SOLOMON E.: Windows on the world: 2d windows for 3d augmented reality. In Proceedings of UIST '93 (1993), pp. 145-155.
6. HINCKLEY K., PAUSCH R., PROFFITT D.: Attention and visual feedback: The bimanual frame of reference. In Proceedings of 1997 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (1997), pp. 121-126.
7. JACOBY R. H., ELLIS S. R.: Using virtual menus in a virtual environment. In Proceedings of Visual Data Interpretation (1992), SPIE, pp. 39-48.
8. KOK A., LIERE R.: Co-location and tactile feedback for 2D widget manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference 2004 (2004), pp. 233-234.
9. KOMERSKA R., WARE C.: A study of haptic linear and pie menus in a 3d fish tank vr environment. haptics 00 (2004), 224-231.
10. LIERE R., MULDER J.: Optical tracking using projective invariant marker pattern properties. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference 2003 (2003), pp. 191-198.
11. LINDEMAN R. W., SIBERT J. L., HAHN J. K.: Towards usable vr: An empirical study of user interfaces for immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of CHI '99 (1999), pp. 64-71.
12. LINDEMAN R. W., SIBERT J. L., TEMPLEMAN J. N.: The effect of 3d widget representation and simulated surface constraints on interaction in virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE VR 2001 (2001), pp. 141-148.
13. LEGANCHUK A., ZHAI S., BUXTON W.: Manual and cognitive benefits of two-handed input: An experimental study. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) (1998), pp. 326-359.
14. MINE M. R., BROOKS JR. F. P., SEQUIN C. H.: Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction. In Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '97) (1997), vol. 31, pp. 19-26.
15. MASSON M. E. J., LOFTUS G. R.: Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (September 2003), 203-220.