A comparison of the ICECAP-O with EQ-5D in a falls prevention clinical setting: Are they complements or substitutes?

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 969-977

  Davis, Jennifer C ^a   Liu Ambrose, Teresa ^a   Richardson, Chris G ^a,b   Bryan, Stirling ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b CENTRE FOR HEALTH EVALUATION AND OUTCOME SCIENCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Economic evaluation; EQ 5D; Falls; ICECAP O; Older adults

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FALLING; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; VERY ELDERLY; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ACCIDENTAL FALLS; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84878736150     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0225-4     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Coast, J.; Flynn, T. N.; Natarajan, L.; Sproston, K.; Lewis, J.; Louviere, J. J.; et al. (2008). Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Social Science Medicine, 67(5), 874-882.
2. Coast, J.; Peters, T. J.; Natarajan, L.; Sproston, K.; Flynn, T. (2008). An assessment of the construct validity of the descriptive system for the ICECAP capability measure for older people. Quality of Life Research, 17(7), 967-976.
3. Sen, A. (1987). Commodities and capabilities. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
4. Sen, A.; Nussbaum, M. (1993). Capability and well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Rowen, D.; Brazier, J.; Tsuchiya, A.; Alava, M. H. (2012). Valuing states from multiple measures on the same visual analogue sale: a feasibility study. Health Economics, 21(6), 715-729.
6. Al-Janabi, H.; Flynn, T. N.; Coast, J. (2012). Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: The ICECAP-A. Quality of Life Research, 21(1), 167-176.
7. Drummond, M. F.; Sculpher, M. J.; Torrance, G. W.; O'Brien, B.; Stoddart, G. L. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation for health care programmes (3rd ed.). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
8. Marra, C. A.; Esdaile, J. M.; Guh, D.; Kopec, J. A.; Brazier, J. E.; Koehler, B. E.; et al. (2004). A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis. Medical Care, 42(11), 1125-1131.
9. Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095-1108.
10. Glendinning, C. (2003). Breaking down barriers: Integrating health and care services for older people in England. Health Policy, 65(2), 139-151.
11. Grewal, I.; Lewis, J.; Flynn, T.; Brown, J.; Bond, J.; Coast, J. (2006). Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities? Social Science Medicine, 62(8), 1891-1901.
12. Folstein, M. F.; Folstein, S. E.; McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189-198.
13. Lord, S.; Sherrington, C.; Menz, H. (2001). A physiological profile approach for falls prevention. In Falls in older people. Risk factors and strategies for prevention. (pp. 221-238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Whitney, J. C.; Lord, S. R.; Close, J. C. (2005). Streamlining assessment and intervention in a falls clinic using the timed up and go test and physiological profile assessments. Age and Ageing, 34(6), 567-571.
15. Coast, J.; Al-Janabi, H. (2008). http://www.icecap.bham.ac.uk/.
16. Nasreddine, Z. S.; Phillips, N. A.; Bedirian, V.; Charbonneau, S.; Whitehead, V.; Collin, I.; et al. (2005). The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695-699.
17. Yesavage, J. A.; Brink, T. L.; Rose, T. L.; Lum, O.; Huang, V.; Adey, M.; et al. (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37-49.
18. van Marwijk, H. W.; Wallace, P.; de Bock, G. H.; Hermans, J.; Kaptein, A. A.; Mulder, J. D. (1995). Evaluation of the feasibility, reliability and diagnostic value of shortened versions of the geriatric depression scale. British Journal of General Practice, 45(393), 195-199.
19. Lord, S. R.; Menz, H. B.; Tiedemann, A. (2003). A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. Physical Therapy, 83(3), 237-252.
20. Hu, L.; Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
21. Muthén, L. K.; Muthén, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthén&Muthén.
22. Hu, L.; Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
23. Makai, P.; Brouwer, W. B.; Koopmanschap, M. A.; Nieboer, A. P. (2011). Capabilities and quality of life in Dutch psycho-geriatric nursing homes: An exploratory study using a proxy version of the ICECAP-O. Quality of Life Research, 21(5), 801-812.
24. Flynn, T. N.; Chan, P.; Coast, J.; Peters, T. J. (2011). Assessing quality of life among British older people using the ICEPOP CAPability (ICECAP-O) measure. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 9(5), 317-329.
25. Neumann, P. J.; Greenberg, D.; Olchanski, N. V.; Stone, P. W.; Rosen, A. B. (2005). Growth and quality of the cost-utility literature, 1976-2001. Value in Health, 8(1), 3-9.
26. Siegel, J. E.; Weinstein, M. C.; Russell, L. B.; Gold, M. R. (1996). Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA, 276(16), 1339-1341.
27. Brazier, J.; Roberts, J.; Tsuchiya, A.; Busschbach, J. (2004). A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Economics, 13(9), 873-884.
28. Tsuchiya, A.; Brazier, J.; Roberts, J. (2006). Comparison of valuation methods used to generate the EQ-5D and the SF-6D value sets. Journal of Health Economics, 25(2), 334-346.
29. Brazier, J.; Roberts, J.; Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271-292.
30. Feeny, D.; Furlong, W.; Torrance, G. W.; Goldsmith, C. H.; Zhu, Z.; DePauw, S.; et al. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40(2), 113-128.
31. Marra, C. A.; Marion, S. A.; Guh, D. P.; Najafzadeh, M.; Wolfe, F.; Esdaile, J. M.; et al. (2007). Not all "quality-adjusted life years" are equal. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(6), 616-624.
32. Marra, C. A.; Woolcott, J. C.; Kopec, J. A.; Shojania, K.; Offer, R.; Brazier, J. E.; et al. (2005). A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Social Science Medicine, 60(7), 1571-1582.