Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1441-1442

  Russom, Christine L ^a   Bradbury, Steven P ^a   Broderius, Steven J ^a   Hammermeister, Dean J ^a   Drummond, Robert A ^a   Veith, Gilman D ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL TOXIC SUBSTANCE;

BIOASSAY; BIOINFORMATICS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ECOTOXICOLOGY; NOTE; OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER POLLUTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84878732461     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2249     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Russom CL, Bradbury SP, Broderius SJ, Hammermeister DE, Drummond RA. 1997. Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem 16:948-967.
2. Weininger D. 1988. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 28:31-36.
3. Russom CL. 2002. Mining environmental toxicology information: Web resources. Toxicology 173:75-88.
4. European Chemical Agency. 2009. Practical guide 5: How to report (Q)SARs. Report ECHA-10-B-10-EN. Helsinki, Finland.
5. Mayo-Bean K, Nabholz JV, Clements R, Zeeman M, Henry T, Rodier D, Moran K, Meylan B, Ranslow P. 2011. Methodology document for the ECOlogical Structure-Activity Relationship Model (ECOSAR) class program: Estimating toxicity of industrial chemicals to aquatic organisms using ECOSAR class program (Ver. 1.1). US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC.
6. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2007. Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships (Q)SAR models. ENV/JM/MONO (2007) 2. Paris, France.
7. Veith GD, Greenwood B, Hunter RS, Niemi GJ, Regal RR. 1988. On the intrinsic dimensionality of chemical structure space. Chemosphere 17:1617-1630.
8. Bradbury SP, Russom CL, Ankley GT, Schultz TW, Walker JD. 2003. Overview of data and conceptual approaches for derivation of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ecotoxicological effects of organic chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1789-1798.
9. Drummond RA, Russom CL. 1990. Behavioral toxicity syndromes: A promising tool for assessing toxicity mechanisms in juvenile fathead minnows. Environ Toxicol Chem 9:37-46.
10. McKim JM, Bradbury SP, Niemi GJ. 1987. Fish acute toxicity syndromes and their use in the QSAR approach to hazard assessment. Environ Health Perspect 71:171-186.
11. Broderius SJ, Kahl MD, Elonen GE, Hammermeister DE, Hoglund MDA. 2005. A comparison of the lethal and sublethal toxicity of organic chemical mixtures to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem 24:3117-2127.
12. Bradbury SP, Lipnick RL. 1990. Symposium on structural properties for determining mechanisms of toxic action. Environ Health Perspect 87:180-271.
13. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2004. OECD principles for the validation, for regulatory purposes, of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship models. The 37th Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology, Paris, France, November 17-19. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/37849783.pdf.
14. Bradbury SP, Feijtel TCJ, van Leeuwen CJ. 2004. Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context. Environ Sci Technol 38:463A-470A.
15. Ankley GA, Bennett RE, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, Mount DR, Nichols JW, Russom CL, Schmieder PK, Serrrano JA, Tietge JE, Villeneuve DI. 2010. Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Enviro Toxicol Chem 29:730-741.
16. Boobis SR, Doe JE, Heinrich-Hirsch B, Meek ME, Mun S, Rchirawat M, Schlatter J, Seed J, Vickers C. 2008. IPCS framework for analysing the relevance of a non-cancer mode of action for humans. Crit Rev Toxicol 38:87-96.
17. National Research Council. 2007. Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
18. van der Jagt S, Munn S, Torslov J, de Bruijn J. 2004. Alternative approaches can reduce the use of test animals under REACH. Report EUR 21405 EN. European Commission, Joint Research Center, Institute for Health Consumer Protection. Ispra, Italy.