In the here and now: Enhanced motor corticospinal excitability in novices when watching live compared to video recorded dance

Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 90-98

  Jola, Corinne ^a   Grosbras, Marie Hélène ^b  

^a DIF   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action observation; Corticospinal excitability; Live presence; Mirror neuron; Novices; Performance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MUSCLE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAM; ENHANCED MOTOR CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VIDEORECORDING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ARM; DANCING; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878656919     PISSN: 17588928     EISSN: 17588936     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2013.776035     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abbruzzese, G. and Trompetto, C. 2002. Clinical and research methods for evaluating cortical excitability. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 19: 307 - 321.
2. Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M. and Urgesi, C. 2008. Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11: 1109 - 1116.
3. Alaerts, K., Swinnen, S. P. and Wenderoth, N. 2009. Is the human primary motor cortex activated by muscular or direction-dependent features of observed movements?. Cortex, 45: 1148 - 1155.
4. Ambrosini, E., Sinigaglia, C. and Costantini, M. 2012. Tie my hands, tie my eyes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 38: 263 - 266.
5. Ph, Auslander. 2008. Liveness. Performance in a mediatized culture, 2nd, London: Routledge.
6. Avenanti, A., Minio-Paluello, I., Bufalari, I. and Aglioti, S. M. 2006. Stimulus-driven modulation of motor-evoked potentials during observation of others' pain. Neuroimage, 32: 316 - 324.
7. Bläsing, B., Calvo-Merino, B., Cross, E., Jola, C., Honisch, J. and Stevens, C. 2012. Neurocognitive control in dance perception and performance. Acta Psychologica, 139: 300 - 308.
8. Borgomaneri, S., Gazzola, V. and Avenanti, A. 2012. Motor mapping of implied actions during perception of emotional body language. Brain Stimulaton, 5: 70 - 76.
9. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E. and Haggard, P. 2005. Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15: 1243 - 1249.
10. Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E. and Haggard, P. 2006. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16: 1905 - 1910.
11. Calvo-Merino, B., Jola, C., Glaser, D. E. and Haggard, P. 2008. Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Consciousness and Cognition, 17: 911 - 922.
12. 1902. [Apparatus]. (1991), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Electronic Design Limited. CED
13. Chen, R. 2000. Studies of human motor physiology with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Muscle Nerve Supplement, 23(S9): S26 - 32.
14. Coelho, C. M., Lipp, O.V., Marinovic, W., Wallis, G. and Riek, S. 2010. Increased corticospinal excitability induced by unpleasant visual stimuli. Neuroscience Letters, 481(3): 135 - 138.
15. Cross, E. S., Kirsch, L., Ticini, L. F. and Schütz-Bosbach, S. 2011. The impact of aesthetic evaluation and physical ability on dance perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5 (102), 110.
16. Cross, E. S. and Ticini, L. F. 2012. Neuroaesthetics and beyond: New horizons in applying the science of the brain to the art of dance. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11: 5 - 16.
17. Enticott, P. G., Harrison, B. A., Arnold, S. L., Nibaldi, K., Segrave, R. A., Fitzgibbon, B. M. and Fitzgerald, P. B. 2012. Emotional valence modulates putative mirror neuron activity. Neuroscience Letters, 508: 56 - 59.
18. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L. and Olivier, E. 2005. Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others' action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15: 213 - 218.
19. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G. and Rizzolatti, G. 1995. Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73: 2608 - 2611.
20. Gale, A., Spratt, G., Chapman, A. J. and Smallbone, A. 1975. EEG correlates of eye contact and interpersonal distance. Biological Psychology, 3: 237 - 245.
21. Gallese, V., Keysers, C. and Rizzolatti, G. 2004. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 396 - 403.
22. Gazzola, V., van der Worp, H., Mulder, T., Wicker, B., Rizzolatti, G., & Keysers, C. (2007). Aplasics born without hands mirror the goal of hand actions with their feet. Current Biology, 17, 1235-1240.
23. Grossmann, T., Cross, E. S., Ticini, L. F. and Daum, M. M. 2013. Action observation in the infant brain: The role of body form and motion. Social Neuroscience, 8: 22 - 30.
24. Hardwick, R. M., McAllister, C. J., Holmes, P. S. and Edwards, M. G. 2012. Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals modulation of corticospinal excitability when observing actions with the intention to imitate. Europen Journal of Neuroscience, 35: 1475 - 1480.
25. International Society for Presence Research (ISPR). (2000). The concept of presence: Explication statement. http://ispr.info/ (http://ispr.info/)
26. Järveläinen, J., Schürmann, M., Avikainen, S. and Hari, R. 2001. Stronger reactivity of the human primary motor cortex during observation of live rather than video motor acts. NeuroReport, 12: 3493 - 3495.
27. Jeannerod, M. 1994. The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17: 187 - 245.
28. Jola, C., Abedian-Amiri, A., Kuppuswamy, A., Pollick, F. E. and Grosbras, M. H. 2012. Motor simulation without motor expertise: Enhanced corticospinal excitability in visually experienced dance spectators. PLoS ONE, 7: e33343
29. Jola, C., Ehrenberg, S. and Reynolds, D. 2012. The experience of watching dance: Phenomenological-neuroscience duets. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11: 17 - 37.
30. Loomis, J. M., Blascovich, J. J. and Beall, A. C. 1999. Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31: 557 - 564.
31. 2 stimulator [Apparatus] (2002), Whitland, UK: The Magstim Company Limited.
32. Novembre, G., Ticini, L. F., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Keller, P. E. 2012. Distinguishing self and other in joint action. Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2894-2903.
33. Petersen, N., Pyndt, H. S. and Nielsen, J. B. 2003. Investigating human motor control by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Experimental Brain Research, 152: 1 - 16.
34. Pönkänen, L. M., Alhoniemi, A., Leppänen, J. M. and Hietanen, J. K. 2011. Does it make a difference if I have an eye contact with you or with your picture? An ERP study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neurosciences, 6: 486 - 494.
35. Reason, M. and Reynolds, D. 2010. Kinesthesia, empathy, and related pleasures: An inquiry into audience experiences of watching dance. Dance Research Journal, 42: 49 - 75.
36. Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Pearrow, M., Mavros, P., Kleiner, M., Gabrieli, J. and Saxe, R. 2010. Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new tool for social cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimage, 50: 1639 - 1647.
37. Risko, E. F., Laidlaw, K., Freeth, M., Foulsham, T. and Kingstone, A. 2012. Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: Toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity. Front in Human Neuroscience, 6 (143), 111.
38. Rizzolatti, G. and Sinigaglia, C. 2010. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11: 264 - 74.
39. Sevdalis, V. and Keller, P. E. 2011. Captured by motion: Dance, action understanding, and social cognition. Brain and Cognition, 77: 231 - 236.
40. Shimada, S. and Hiraki, K. 2006. Infant's brain responses to live and televised action. NeuroImage, 32: 930 - 939.
41. [Computer software], Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Electonic Design Limited. Signal (4.06)
42. Silas, J., Levy, J. P. and Holmes, A. 2012. Sensitivity of 'mu' rhythm modulation to the relevance of an observed movement but not to goal congruency. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85: 168 - 173.
43. SPSS. PASW Statistics 18 (Version 18) [Computer software]. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/downloads.html (http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/downloads.html)
44. Stevens, C. J., Winskel, H., Howell, C., Vidal, L.-M., Latimer, C. and Milne-Home, J. 2010. Perceiving dance: Schematic expectations guide experts' scanning of a contemporary dance film. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 14: 19 - 25.
45. Strafella, A. P. and Paus, T. 2000. Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. NeuroReport, 11: 2289 - 2292.
46. Virji-Babul, N., Rose, A., Moiseeva, N. and Makan, N. 2012. Neural correlates of action understanding in infants: Influence of motor experience. Brain and Behavior, 2: 237 - 242.
47. Wassermann, E., Ch, Epstein, Ziemann, U., Walsh, V., Paus, T. and Lisanby, S. H. 2008. Oxford handbook of transcranial stimulation, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.