Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: A comparative study of outcome in patients with preexisting glaucoma

Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 73-78

  Nguyen, Pho ^a   Khashabi, Shabnam ^a   Chopra, Vikas ^a   Francis, Brian ^a   Heur, Martin ^a   Song, Jonathan C ^a,b,c   Yiu, Samuel C ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KING KHALED EYE SPECIALIST HOSPITAL   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Cornea transplant; Drainage device; DSAEK; Glaucoma; Graft failure; Intraocular pressure; Trabeculoplasty; Tube shunt

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT; GLAUCOMA SURGERY; GRAFT DETACHMENT; GRAFT FAILURE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ABNORMALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 84878654081     PISSN: 13194534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2013.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Eye Banking Statistical Report. Washington, D.C. Eye Bank Association of America, 2008.
2. Price F.W., Price M.O. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006, 32(3):411-418.
3. Terry M.A., Shamie N., Chen E.S., Hoar K.L., Friend D.J. Endothelial keratoplasty - a simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology 2008, 115(7):1179-1186.
4. Bahar I., Kaiserman I., McAllum P., Slomovic A., Rootman D. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2008, 115(9):1525-1533.
5. Lee W.B., Jacobs D.S., Musch D.C., Kaufman S.C., Reinhart W.J., Shtein R.M. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2009, 116(9):1818-1830.
6. Price M.O., Gorovoy M., Benetz B.A., et al. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the cornea donor study. Ophthalmology 2010, 117(3):438-444.
7. Price M.O., Price F.W. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007, 18(4):290-294.
8. Terry M.A. Precut tissue for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: complications are from technique, not tissue. Cornea 2008, 27(6):627-629.
9. Terry M.A., Shamie N., Chen E.S., Hoar K.L., Phillips P.M., Friend D.J. Endothelial keratoplasty: the influence of preoperative donor endothelial cell densities on dislocation, primary graft failure, and 1-year cell counts. Cornea 2008, 27(10):1131-1137.
10. Terry M.A., Shamie N., Chen E.S., Hoar K.L., Friend D.J. Endothelial keratoplasty: a simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology 2008, 115(7):1179-1186.
11. Mearza A.A., Qureshi M.A., Rostron C.K. Experience and 12-month results of descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with a small incision technique. Cornea 2007, 26(3):279-283.
12. Price M.O., Price F.W. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology 2006, 113(11):1936-1942.
13. Suh L.H., Yoo S.H., Deobhakta A., et al. Complications of Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: survey of 118 eyes at one institute. Ophthalmology 2008, 115(9):1517-1524.
14. Lee J.S., Desai N.R., Schmidt G.W., et al. Secondary angle closure caused by air migrating behind the pupil in descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2009, 28(6):652-656.
15. Vajaranant T.S., Price M.O., Price F.W., Gao W., Wilensky J.T., Edward D.P. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with and without preexisting glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2009, 116(9):1644-1650.
16. Espana E.M., Robertson Z.M., Huang B. Intraocular pressure changes following Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010, 248(2):237-242.
17. Banitt M.R., Chopra V. Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty and glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010, 21(2):144-149.
18. Allen M.B., Lieu P., Mootha V.V., et al. Risk factors for intraocular pressure elevation after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens 2010, 36(4):223-227.
19. Price M.O., Jordan C.S., Moore G., Price W.F. Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part two: the statistical analysis of probability and risk factors. Br J Ophthalmol 2009, 93(3):391-395.
20. Koenig S.B., Covert D.J. Early results of small-incision Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2007, 114(2):221-226.
21. Chen E.S., Terry M.A., Shamie N., Hoar K.L., Friend D.J. Pre-cut tissue in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: donor characteristics and early postoperative complications. Ophthalmology 2008, 115(3):497-502.
22. Price M.O., Baig K.M., Brubaker J.W., Price F.W. Randomized, prospective comparison of precut vs surgeon-dissected grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008, 146(1):36-41.
23. Sansanayudh W., Bahar I., Rootman D. Novel technique in preparing a donor DSAEK lenticule in a patient with a glaucoma drainage device. Br J Ophthalmol 2009, 93(4):1267-1269.
24. Sugar A., Tanner J.P., Dontchev M., et al. Recipient risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. Ophthalmology 2009, 116(6):1023-1028.
25. Gordon M.O., Kass M.A. The Ocular hypertension treatment study: design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol 1999, 117(5):573-583.
26. Price M.O., Fairchild K.M., Price D.A., Price F.W. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology 2011, 118(4):725-729.
27. Phillips P.M., Terry M.A., Shamie N., et al. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with previous trabeculectomy and tube shunt procedures: intraoperative and early postoperative complications. Cornea 2010, 29(5):534-540.
28. Shah A.K., Terry M.A., Shamie N., et al. Complications and clinical outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with intraocular lens exchange. Am J Ophthalmol 2010, 149(3):390-397.
29. Ayyala R.S. Penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2000, 45(2):91-105.
30. Brandt J.D., Lim M.C., O'Day D.G. Glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2005, vol. 2:1575-1579. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, PA. 2nd ed.
31. Tavares I.M., Medeiros F.A., Weinreb R.N. Inconsistency of the published definition of ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma 2006, 15(6):529-533.
32. Tillett C.W. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1956, 41(3):530-533.
33. Rahman I., Carley F., Hillarby C., Brahma A., Tullo A.B. Penetrating keratoplasty: indications, outcomes, and complications. Eye 2009, 23(6):1288-1294.
34. Hollander D.A., Giaconi J.A., Holland G.N., et al. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with Ahmed valves. Am J Ophthalmol 2010, 150(2):169-178.
35. Anshu A., Price M.O., Richardson M.R., Segu Z.M., Lai X., Yoder M.C., et al. Alterations in the aqueous humor proteome in patients with a glaucoma shunt device. Mol Vis 2011, 17:1891-1900.
36. Kooner K.S., Cooksey J.C., Barron J.B., Zimmerman T.J., et al. Tonometry comparison: Goldmann versus Tono Pen. Ann Ophthalmol 1992 Jan, 24(1):29-36.
37. Carrim Z.I., Lavy T.E. Goldmann tonometry versus the Tono-Pen XL for intraocular pressure measurement: an evaluation of the potential impact on clinical decision making in glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009 Nov, 29(6):648-651.