Haemodynamic impact of stent-vessel (mal)apposition following carotid artery stenting: Mind the gaps!

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 648-659

  de Santis, G ^a   Conti, M ^b   Trachet, B ^a   de Schryver, T ^a   de Beule, M ^a   Degroote, J ^a   Vierendeels, J ^a   Auricchio, F ^b   Segers, P ^a   Verdonck, P ^a   Verhegghe, B ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

carotid artery stenting; computational fluid dynamics; finite element analysis; image based analysis; impedance model; pyFormex

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MEDICAL IMAGING; SHEAR FLOW; STRUTS;

CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CLINICAL TREATMENTS; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; EXTERNAL CAROTID ARTERIES; IMAGE-BASED ANALYSIS; IMPEDANCE MODELS; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; PYFORMEX;

STENTS;

BIOMECHANICS; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID STENOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STENT;

BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CAROTID ARTERIES; CAROTID STENOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; STENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84878639920     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2011.629997     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AppanaboyinaS, MutF, LohnerR, PutmanCA, CebralJR. 2008. Computational fluid dynamics of stented intracranial aneurysms using adaptive embedded unstructured grids. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 57(5):475-493.
2. AuricchioF, TaylorRL, LublinerJ. 1997. Shape-memory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 146(3-4):281-312.
3. AuricchioF, ContiM, De BeuleM, De SantisG, VerheggheB. 2011. Carotid artery stenting simulation: from patient-specific images to finite element analysis. Med Eng Phys. 33(3):281-289.
4. BalossinoR, GervasoF, MigliavaccaF, DubiniG. 2008. Effects of different stent designs on local hemodynamics in stented arteries. J Biomech. 41(5):1053-1061.
5. BangaloreS, KumarS, WetterslevJ, BavryAA, GluudC, CutlipDE, BhattDL. 2011. Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Arch Neurol. 68(2):172-184.
6. BrottTG, HobsonRW, HowardG, RoubinGS, ClarkWM, BrooksW, MackeyA, HillMD, LeimgruberPP, SheffetAJ.2010. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. New Engl J Med. 363(1):11-23.
7. CarnelliD, PennatiG, VillaT, BaglioniL, ReimersB, MigliavaccaF.2011. Mechanical properties of open-cell, self-expandable shape memory alloy carotid stents. Artif Organs. 35(1):74-80.
8. ContiM, van LooD, AuricchioF, De BeuleM, De SantisG, VerheggheB, PirrelliS, OderoA.2011. Impact of carotid stent cell design on vessel scaffolding: a case study comparing experimental investigation and numerical simulations. J Endovasc Ther. 18(3):397-406.
9. CosottiniM, MichelassiMC, BencivelliW, LazzarottiG, PicchiettiS, OrlandiG, ParentiG, PuglioliM. 2010. In stent restenosis predictors after carotid artery stenting. Stroke Res Treat. March 14. 10.4061/2010/864724.
10. De SantisG, MortierP, De BeuleM, SegersP, VerdonckP, VerheggheB.2010. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics: structured mesh generation from coronary angiography. Med Biol Eng Comput. 48(4):371-380.
11. De SantisG, De BeuleM, SegersP, VerdonckP, VerheggheB. 2011. Patient-specific computational haemodynamics: generation of structured and conformal hexahedral meshes from triangulated surfaces of vascular bifurcations. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 14(9): 797-802.
12. De SantisG, De BeuleM, van CanneytK, SegersP, VerdonckP, VerheggheB.in press. Full-hexahedral structured meshing for image-based computational vascular modeling. Med Eng Phys.
13. EderleJ, DobsonJ, FeatherstoneRL, BonatiLH, van der WorpHB, de BorstGJ, LoTH, GainesP, DormanPJ, MacdonaldS, LyrerPA.2010. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (international carotid stenting study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 375(9719):985-997.
14. EnerRA, FissD, GeorgakisA, WolfNM, PanditN, PiegariGN.2008. Carotid artery in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting. J Invasive Cardiol. 20(6):286-291.
15. GroschelK, RieckerA, SchulzJB, ErnemannU, KastrupA. 2005. Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke. 36(2):367-373.
16. HeXJ, KuDN. 1996. Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME. 118(1):74-82.
17. HoldsworthDW, NorleyCJD, FrayneR, SteinmanDA, RuttBK. 1999. Characterization of common carotid artery blood-flow waveforms in normal human subjects. Physiol Measure. 20(3):219-240.
18. KarmonikC, BismuthJ, DaviesMG, ShahDJ, YounesHK, LumsdenAB.2011. A computational fluid dynamics study pre- and post-stent graft placement in an acute type B aortic dissection. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 45(2):157-164.
19. KimM, TaulbeeDB, TremmelM, MengH. 2008. Comparison of two stents in modifying cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng. 36(5):726-741.
20. KleinstreuerC, LiZ, FarberMA. 2007. Fluid-structure interaction analyses of stented abdominal aortic aneurysms. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 9:169-204.
21. KleinstreuerC, LiZ, BascianoCA, SeeleckeS, FarberMA. 2008. Computational mechanics of Nitinol stent grafts. J Biomech. 41(11):2370-2378.
22. LaDisaJF, GulerI, OlsonLE, HettrickDA, KerstenJR, WarltierDC, PagelPS.2003. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of alterations in coronary wall shear stress produced by stent implantation. Ann Biomed Eng. 31(8):972-980.
23. Lanoye L. 2007. Fluid-structure interaction of blood vessels. [PhD thesis], Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
24. LarrabideI, KimM, AugsburgerL, Villa-UriolMC, RüfenachtD, FrangiAF.2010. Fast virtual deployment of self-expandable stents: method and in vitro evaluation for intracranial aneurysmal stenting. Med Image Anal.
25. LeeS-W, SteinmanDA. 2007. On the relative importance of rheology for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME. 129(2):273-278.
26. LeeS-W, AntigaL, SteinmanDA. 2009. Correlations among indicators of disturbed flow at the normal carotid bifurcation. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME. 131(6): 061013.
27. LiZH, KleinstreuerC. 2005. Blood flow and structure interactions in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model. Med Eng Phys. 27(5):369-382.
28. MalekAM, AlperSL, IzumoS. 1999. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. J Am Med Assoc. 282(21):2035-2042.
29. MorbiducciU, GalloD, MassaiD, ConsoloF, PonziniR, AntigaL, BignardiC, DeriuMA, RedaelliA.2010. Outflow conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: implications for indicators of abnormal flow. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME. 132(9): 091005.
30. MorbiducciU, GalloD, PonziniR, MassaiD, AntigaL, MontevecchiFM, RedaelliA.2010. Quantitative analysis of bulk flow in image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: the influence of outflow conditions as test case. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(12):3688-3705.
31. MorbiducciU, GalloD, MassaiD, PonziniR, DeriuM, AntigaL, RedaelliA, MontevecchiFM.2011. On the importance of blood rheology for bulk flow in hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation. J Biomech. 44(13):2427-2438.
32. MortierP, HolzapfelGA, De BeuleM, Van LooD, TaeymansY, SegersP, VerdonckP, VerheggheB.2010. A novel simulation strategy for stent insertion and deployment in curved coronary bifurcations: comparison of three drug-eluting stents. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(1):88-99.
33. OlufsenMS. 1999. Structured tree outflow condition for blood flow in larger systemic arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 276(1):H257-H268.
34. PantS, BressloffNW, ForresterAIJ, CurzenN. 2010. The influence of strut-connectors in stented vessels: a comparison of pulsatile flow through five coronary stents. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(5):1893-1907.
35. ParaskevasKI, MikhailidisDP, VeithFJ. 2010. Mechanisms to explain the poor results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in symptomatic patients to date and options to improve CAS outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 52(5):1367-1375.
36. PrendergastPJ, LallyC, DalyS, ReidAJ, LeeTC, QuinnD, DolanF.2003. Analysis of prolapse in cardiovascular stents: a constitutive equation for vascular tissue and finite-element modelling. Trans ASME. J Biomech Eng. 125(5):692-699.
37. RadaelliAG, AugsburgerL, CebralJR, OhtaM, RüfenachtDA, BalossinoR, BenndorfG, HoseDR, MarzoA, MetcalfeR, MortierP, MutF, ReymondP, SocciL, VerheggheB, FrangiAF.2008. Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model - a report on the virtual intracranial stenting challenge 2007. J Biomech. 41(10):2069-2081.
38. ReymondP, MerendaF, PerrenF, RufenachtD, StergiopulosN. 2009. Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 297(1):H208-H222.
39. ShahPK. 2003. Inflammation, neointimal hyperplasia, and restenosis - as the leukocytes roll, the arteries thicken. Circulation. 107(17):2175-2177.
40. TanigawaJ, BarlisP, Di MarioC. 2007. Do unapposed stent struts endothelialise? In vivo demonstration with optical coherence tomography. Heart. 93(3):378.
41. WilliamsAR, KooBK, GundertTJ, FitzgeraldPJ, LaDisaJF. 2010. Local hemodynamic changes caused by main branch stent implantation and subsequent virtual side branch balloon angioplasty in a representative coronary bifurcation. J Appl Physiol. 109(2):532-540.