CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: Acointegration approach

Energy

Volumn 55, Issue , 2013, Pages 813-822

  Saboori, Behnaz ^a   Sulaiman, Jamalludin ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide emissions; Economic growth; Energy consumption

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ELASTICITY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GLOBAL WARMING;

ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS; CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; COINTEGRATION RELATIONSHIP; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVES; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; NON-LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; VECTOR ERROR-CORRECTION;

ECONOMICS;

ASEAN; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENERGY USE; ERROR CORRECTION; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; INTEGRATED APPROACH; KUZNETS CURVE; NUMERICAL MODEL;

SINGAPORE [SOUTHEAST ASIA]; THAILAND;

EID: 84878634147     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.038     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Shafik N., Bandyopadhyay S. Economic growth and environmental quality: time series and cross-country evidence 1992, World Bank working paper no. 904, Washington, DC.
2. Seldon T., Song D. Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions. JEnviron Econ Manage 1994, 27:147-162.
3. Unruh G.C., Moomaw W.R. An alternative analysis of apparent EKC-type transitions. Ecol Econ 1998, 25:221-229.
4. Galeotti M., Lanza A. Richer and cleaner? A study on carbon dioxide emissions in developing countries. Energy Policy 1999, 27:565-573.
5. Dinda S., Coondoo D. Income and emission: a panel-data based cointegration analysis. Ecol Econ 2006, 57:167-181.
6. Managi S., Jena P.R. Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecol Econ 2008, 65:432-440.
7. Shafik N. Economic development and environmental quality: and econometric analysis. Oxf Econ Pap 1994, 46:757-773.
8. Cole M.A., Rayner A.J., Bates J.M. The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Econ 1997, 2(4):401-416.
9. de Bruyn S.M., van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Opschoor J.B. Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecol Econ 1998, 25:161-175.
10. Roca J., Padilla E., Farre M., Galletto V. Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecol Econ 2001, 39:85-99.
11. Coondoo D., Dinda S. The carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecol Econ 2008, 65:375-385.
12. Akbostanci E., Turut-Asik S., Tunc G.I. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve?. Energy Policy 2009, 37:861-867.
13. Stern D. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 2004, 32:1419-1439.
14. Dinda S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 2004, 49:431-455.
15. Kijima M., Nishide K., Ohyama A. Economic models for the EKC: a survey. JEcon Dyn Control 2010, 34:1187-1201.
16. Kraft J., Kraft A. On the relationship between energy and GNP. JEnergy Dev 1978, 3:401-403.
17. Ozturk I. Aliterature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy 2010, 38:340-349.
18. Payne J.E. Survey of the international evidence on the causal relationship between energy consumption and growth. JEcon Stud 2010, 37:53-95.
19. 2 emission and economic growth in MENA countries. Energy 2011, 36:6165-6171.
20. Fallahi F. Causal relationship between energy consumption (EC) and GDP: a Markov-switching (MS) causality. Energy 2011, 36:4165-4170.
21. 2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4772-4778.
22. Soytas U., Sari R., Ewing B.T. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol Econ 2007, 62:482-489.
23. 2 emissions and economic growth in Europe. Energy 2010, 35:5412-5420.
24. Ang J.B. Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. JPol Model 2008, 30:271-278.
25. Zhang X.P., Cheng X.M. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecol Econ 2009, 68:2706-2712.
26. Ghosh S. Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: a multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy 2010, 38:3008-3014.
27. 2 emissions, and fossil fuels consumption in Iran. Energy 2010, 35:5115-5120.
28. Menyah K., Rufael Y. Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. Energy Econ 2010, 32:1374-1382.
29. 2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010, 14:3220-3225.
30. 2 emissions, energy usage and output in Central America. Energy Policy 2009, 37:3282-3286.
31. Apergis N., Payne J.E. The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: evidence from the common wealth of independent states. Energy Policy 2010, 38:650-655.
32. 2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Appl Energy 2010, 87:1858-1864.
33. 2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 2010, 38:850-860.
34. 2 emission on the economic growth and financial development of in the Sub Saharan African countries. Energy 2012, 39:180-186.
35. Bashiri Behmiri N., Pires Manso J.R. Crude oil conservation policy hypothesis in OECD (organisation for economic cooperation and development) countries: a multivariate panel Granger causality test. Energy 2012, 43:253-260.
36. Luzzati T., Orsini M. Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve. Energy 2009, 34:291-300.
37. Third ASEAN energy outlook 2010, The Energy Data and Modelling Center,The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan. http://aseanenergy.org/media/filemanager/2012/06/14/t/3/t3aeo-complete-outlook.pdf.
38. Tanaka N. World energy outlook 2010, International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/speech/2010/Tanaka/weo_2010_beijing.pdf.
39. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. An autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometrics and economic theory in 20th century: the Ragnar Frisch Centennial symposium 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, [chapter 11]. S. Strom (Ed.).
40. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y., Smith R.J. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. JAppl Econ 2001, 16:289-326.
41. 2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turk
42. Sari R, Soytas U. Are global warming and economic growth combatable? Evidence from five OPEC countries. Appl Energy 2009;86:1887e93.
43. Engle RF, Granger CWJ. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 1987;55:251e76.
44. Johansen S, Juselius K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration with approach. Oxford Bull Econom Stat 1990;52:169e209.
45. Pesaran MH, Pesaran B. Working with Microfit 4.0: interactive econometric analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
46. Narayan PK. The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 2005;37:1979e90.
47. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Goswami GG. Exchange rate sensitivity of Japan's bilateral trade flows. Japan World Econ 2004;16:1e15.
48. Brown R, Durbin J, Evans J. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. J Roy Stat Soc B 1975;37:149e72.
49. Dickey DA, Fuller WA. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 1981;49:1057e72.
50. Philips P, Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 1988;75:335e46.
51. Ouattara B. Aid, debt and fiscal policies in Senegal. J Int Dev 2006;18:1105e22.
52. Kremers JJ, Ericson NR, Dolado JJ. The power of cointegration tests. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 1992;54:325e47.
53. Poa H, Yu H, Yang Y. Modeling the CO2 emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia. Energy 2011:1e7.
54. Chang C. A multivariate causality test of carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China. Appl Energy 2010;87:3533e7.
55. Pao H, Tsai C. Modeling and forecasting the CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil. Energy 2011;36:2450e8.
56. Narayan PK, Narayan S. Carbon dioxide and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 2010;38:661e6.