Interactively guided introspection is getting science closer to an effective consciousness meter

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 672-676

  Froese, Tom ^a  

^a Cd Universitaria   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Choice blindness; Introspection; Measures of consciousness; Second person method

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CONSCIOUSNESS LEVEL; CONSCIOUSNESS METER; HUMAN; INTROSPECTION; NOTE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SCIENCE;

EID: 84878620320     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.004     Document Type: Note

References (26)

1. Chalmers D.J. The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory 1996, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
2. Dennett D.C. How could I be wrong? How wrong could I be?. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2002, 9(5-6):13-16.
3. Dienes Z., Seth A.K. Gambling on the unconscious: A comparison of wagering and confidence ratings as measures of awareness in an artificial grammar task. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19(2):674-681.
4. Froese T., Gould C., Barrett A. Re-viewing from within: A commentary on first- and second-person methods in the science of consciousness. Constructivist Foundations 2011, 6(2):254-269.
5. Froese T., Gould C., Seth A.K. Validating and calibrating first- and second-person methods in the science of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2011, 18(2):38-64.
6. Heavey C.L., Hurlburt R.T. The phenomena of inner experience. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:798-810.
7. Hurlburt R.T. Investigating pristine inner experience: moments of truth 2011, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
8. Hurlburt R.T., Heavey C.L. Interobserver reliability of descriptive experience sampling. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2002, 26(1):135-142.
9. Jack A.I., Roepstorff A. Why trust the subject?. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2003, 10(9-10):v-xx.
10. Johansson P., Hall L., Sikström S., Tärning B., Lind A. How something can be said about telling more than we can know: On choice blindness and introspection. Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 16:673-692.
11. Johansson P., Hall L., Silkström S., Olsson A. Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science 2005, 310:116-119.
12. Klein O., Doyen S., Leys C., Magalhāes de Saldanha da Gama P., Miller S., et al. Low hopes, high expectations: Expectancy effects and the replicability of behavioral experiments. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7(6):572-584.
13. Lamme V.A.F. Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(1):12-18.
14. Lamme V.A.F. How neuroscience will change our view on consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 1(3):204-220.
15. Nisbett R.E., Wilson T.D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 1977, 84(3):231-259.
16. Overgaard M., Timmermans B., Sandberg K., Cleeremans A. Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19(2):682-684.
17. Petitmengin C. Describing one's subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2006, 5(3-4):229-269.
18. Petitmengin C., Bitbol M. Let's trust the (skilled) subject! A reply to Froese, Gould and Seth. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2011, 18(2):90-97.
19. Petitmengin, C., Remillieux, A., Cahour, B., & Carter-Thomas, S. (2013). A gap in Nisbett and Wilson's findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 654-669.
20. Petitmengin C., Navarro V., Le Van Quyen M. Anticipating seizure: Pre-reflective experience at the center of neuro-phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16(3):746-764.
21. Reid K., Flowers P., Larkin M. Exploring lived experience. The Psychologist 2005, 18(1):20-23.
22. Sandberg K., Timmermans B., Overgaard M., Cleeremans A. Measuring consciousness: Is one measure better than the other?. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19(4):1069-1078.
23. Schwitzgebel E. No unchallengable epistemic authority, of any sort, regarding our own conscious experience - Contra Dennett?. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2007, 6:107-113.
24. Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 1960, 74(11):1-29.
25. Waroquier L., Marchiori D., Klein O., Cleeremans A. Is it better to think unconsciously or to trust your first impression? A reassessment of unconscious thought theory. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2010, 1(2):111-118.
26. Wierzchoń M., Asanowicz D., Paulewicz B., Cleeremans A. Subjective measures of consciousness in artificial grammar learning task. Consciousness and Cognition 2012, 21(3):1141-1153.