The analytic hierarchy process to support decision-making processes in infrastructure projects with social impact

Total Quality Management and Business Excellence

Volumn 24, Issue 5-6, 2013, Pages 596-606

  Álvarez, Manuel ^a   Moreno, Ana ^a   Mataix, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

analytic hierarchy process; corporate social responsibility; decision making; innovation; stakeholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878610295     PISSN: 14783363     EISSN: 14783371     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2012.669561     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Accorsi, R., Apostolakis, G. and Zio, E. 1999. Prioritizing stakeholder concerns in environmental risk management. Journal of Risk Research, 2 (1): 11 - 29. (doi:10.1080/136698799376961)
2. AccountAbility & Utopies. (2007). Critical friends: The emerging role of stakeholder panels in corporate governance, reporting and assurance. Informe de investigación realizado por AccountAbility y Utopies.
3. Álvarez, M., Moreno, A., & Mataix, C. (2009). Aplicación del modelo AHP como apoyo para la toma de decisiones en proyectos de grandes infraestructuras con impacto social. 3rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management - XIII Congreso de Ingeniería de Organización (CIO 2009), Barcelona, September 2009.
4. Ananda, J. and Herath, G. 2003. The use of analytic hierarchy process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy and Economics, 5 (1): 13 - 26. (doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00043-6)
5. Ávila, R. (2000, December). El AHP (proceso analítico jerárquico) y su aplicación para determinar los usos de las tierras. Informe técnico realizado para la FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). (Proyecto GCP/RLA/126/JPN). Santiago, Chile: FAO.
6. Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B., & Vincke, P. (1984). PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. In J.P. Brans (Ed.), Operational research, IFORS 84 (pp. 477-490). North Holland: Amsterdam.
7. Clarkson, M. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1): 92 - 117.
8. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston, MA: Pitman.
9. Freeman, R. E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder approach: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 409 - 421. (doi:10.2307/3857340)
10. Foote, J., Gaffney, N. and Evans, J. R. 2010. Corporate social responsibility: Implications for performance excellence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21 (8): 799 - 812. (doi:10.1080/14783363.2010.487660)
11. Ghobadian, A., Gallear, D. and Hopkins, M. 2007. TQM and CSR nexus. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24 (2): 704 - 721.
12. Kanji, G. P. and Chopra, P. K. 2010. Corporate social responsibility in a global economy. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21 (2): 119 - 143. (doi:10.1080/14783360903549808)
13. Mardle, S., Pascoe, S. and Herrero, I. 2004. Management objective importance in fisheries: An evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process. Environmental Management, 33 (1): 1 - 11. (doi:10.1007/s00267-003-3070-y)
14. Masozera, M.K. (2002). Socioeconomic impact analysis of the conservation of the Nyungwe forest reserve, Rwanda. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
15. Mataix, C., Moreno, A., Álvarez de Liébana, N., Álvarez, M. and Ibisate, A. J. 2008. " La estructuración de las relaciones con Grupos de Interés (stakeholders) como fuente de innovación organizativa ". In II international conference on industrial engineering and industrial management, Edited by: Saiz, en L., Izquierdo, Lr. and Santos, J. I. 121 - 122. Burgos: University of Burgos-ADINGOR.
16. Moreno, A., Uriarte, L.M., & Topa, G. (2010). La Responsabilidad Social Empresarial. Oportunidades estratégicas, organizativas y de recursos humanos. Madrid: Ed. Pirámides.
17. Mustajoki, J., Hamalainen, R. P. and Marttunen, M. 2003. Participatory multicriteria decision analysis with Web-HIPRE: A case of lake regulation policy. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19 (2004): 537 - 547.
18. Nielsen, J. R. and Mathiesen, C. 2006. Stakeholder preferences for Danish fisheries management of sand eel and Norway pout. Fisheries Research, 77 (1): 92 - 101. (doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2005.08.002)
19. Pedersen, E. R. and Neergaard, P. 2008. From periphery to center: How CSR is integrated in mainstream performance management frameworks. Measuring Business Excellence, 12 (1): 4 - 12. (doi:10.1108/13683040810864341)
20. Rodriguez Fernandez, J.M. (2007). Responsabilidad social corporativa y análisis económico: práctica frente a teoría. Revista Economiaz n° 65, 2° cuatrimestre de 2007.
21. Saaty, T. L. 1990. Multicriteria decision making. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting resource allocation, Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
22. Susman, G. 1983. Action research: A sociotechnical systems perspective, London: Sage Publications.
23. Zink, K. J. 2005. Stakeholder orientation and corporate social responsibility as a precondition for sustainability. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16 (8): 1041 - 1052.