Facial aesthetics and perceived need for further treatment among adults with repaired cleft as assessed by cleft team professionals and laypersons

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 341-346

  Foo, Peter ^a   Sampson, Wayne ^a   Roberts, Rachel ^a   Jamieson, Lisa ^b   David, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84878591043     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr129     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adams G 1980 The effects of physical attractiveness on the socialisation process. In: Lucker G W R, Ribbens K A, McNamara J A (eds.). Psychological aspects of facial form. Craniofacial Growth Series Monograph No11. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, pp. 25-48
2. Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw W C, Gallager C 1991 Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 28: 385-390
3. Berk N, Cooper M E, Liu Y E, Marazita M L 2001 Social anxiety in Chinese adults with oral facial clefts. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 38: 126-133 (Pubitemid 32436272)
4. Berscheid E 1980 Overview of the psychological effects of physical attractiveness. In: Lucker G W R, Ribbens K A, McNamara J A (eds.). Psychological aspects of facial form. Craniofacial Growth Series Monograph No11. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, pp. 1-23
5. Berscheid E, Gangestad S 1982 The social psychological implications of facial physical attractiveness. Clinics in Plastic Surgery 9: 189-296
6. Harris D, Carr A T 2001 Prevalence of concern about physical appearance in the general population. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 54: 223-226 (Pubitemid 32288604)
7. Howells D J, Shaw W C 1985 The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 402-408 (Pubitemid 16221365)
8. Jacobson A 1984 Psychological aspects of dentofacial esthetics and orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthodontist 54: 18-35 (Pubitemid 14167206)
9. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt G H 1990 A comparison of seven-point and visual analogue scales. Controlled Clinical Trials 11: 43-51
10. Jeffery S, Boorman J G 2001 Patient satisfaction with cleft lip and palate services in a regional centre. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 54: 189-191 (Pubitemid 32288596)
11. Kenealy P M, Kingdon A, Richmond S, Shaw W C 2007 The Cardiff dental study: a 20 year critical evaluation of the psychological health gain from orthodontic treatment. British Journal of Health Psychology 12: 17-49 (Pubitemid 46213524)
12. Kiekens R M, Maltha J C, van 't Hof M A, Kuijipers-Jagtman A M 2005 A measuring system for facial aesthetics in Caucasian adolescents: reproducibility and validity. European Journal of Orthodontics 27: 579-584 (Pubitemid 41787623)
13. Kiekens R M, van 't Hof M A, Straatman H, Kuijipers-Jagtman A M, Maltha J C 2007 Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces. European Journal of Orthodontics 29: 95-99
14. Lancaster P, Pedisich E 1995 Congenital malformations Australia 1981-1992. Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit
15. Langlois J, Roggman L A, Casey R J, Ritter J M, Danner A W, Yenkins V Y 1987 Infants preferences for attractive faces: rudiments of a stereotype? Developmental Psycholgy 23: 363-369
16. Lo L J, Wong F H, Madini S, Chen Y R, Noordhoff M S 2002 Assessment of bilateral cleft lip nose deformity: a comparison of results as judged by cleft surgeons and laypersons. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 110: 733
17. Lundström A, Woodside D G, Popovich F 1987 Panel assessment of facial profile related to mandibular growth direction. European Journal of Orthodontics 17: 101-109
18. Marcusson A, Paulin G, Östrup L 2002 Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 36: 16-23 (Pubitemid 34203112)
19. Murray J 1995 Invited editorial. Face facts: genes, environment, and clefts. American Journal of Human Genetics 57: 227-232
20. Oosterkamp B C et al. 2007 Satisfaction with treatment outcome in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 36: 890-895 (Pubitemid 47535111)
21. Peerlings R, Kuijpers-Jagtman A M, Hoeksma J B 1995 A photographic scale to measure facial aesthetics. European Journal of Orthodontics 17: 101-109
22. Ramstad T, Otten E, Shaw W C 1995 Psychosocial adjustment in Norwegian adults who had undergone standardised treatment of complete cleft lip and palate. Part II. Self-reported problems and concerns with appearance. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 29: 329-336 (Pubitemid 26005323)
23. Sinko K, Jagsch R, Prechtl V, Watzinger F, Hollmann K, Baumann A 2005 Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and quality of life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 42: 355-361 (Pubitemid 40994527)
24. Tatarunaite E, Playle R, Hood K, Shaw W, Richmond S 2005 Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 127: 676-682 (Pubitemid 40799138)
25. Tobiasen J M, Hiebert J M, Boraz R A 1991 Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 28: 419