Neuronal differentiation on anisotropic substrates and the influence ofnanotopographical noise on neurite contact guidance

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 25, 2013, Pages 6027-6036

  Tonazzini, Ilaria ^a   Meucci, Sandro ^a,b   Faraci, Paolo ^a   Beltram, Fabio ^a   Cecchini, Marco ^a  

^a SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE   (Italy)

^b CENTER FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION NEST   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cell contractility; Contact guidance; Focal adhesion; Mechanotransduction; Neurite; Noise

Indexed keywords

CONTACT GUIDANCE; FOCAL ADHESIONS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; NEURITES; NOISE;

ADHESION; CELLS; CYTOLOGY;

NEURONS;

BLEBBISTATIN; NOCODAZOLE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BRIGHT FIELD MICROSCOPY; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FOCAL ADHESION; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LOW FREQUENCY NOISE; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NERVE FIBER GROWTH; NERVE FUNCTION; NERVE REGENERATION; NEURITE; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TOPOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; ANISOTROPY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NERVE REGENERATION; NEURITES; NEURONS; NOISE; PC12 CELLS; RATS;

EID: 84878588164     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.039     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Curtis A.S., Casey B., Gallagher J.O., Pasqui D., Wood M., Wilkinson C.D. Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nanotopography important?. Biophys Chem 2001, 94:275-283.
2. Stevens M.M., George J.H. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 2005, 310:1135-1138.
3. Geiger B., Spatz J.P., Bershadsky A.D. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10:21-33.
4. DuFort C.C., Paszek M.J., Weaver V.M. Balancing forces: architectural control of mechanotransduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011, 12:308-319.
5. Flemming R.G., Murphy C.J., Abrams G.A., Goodman S.L., Nealey P.F. Effects of synthetic micro and nanostructured surfaces on cell behaviour. Biomaterials 1999, 20:573-588.
6. Curtis A.S., Gadegaard N., Dalby M.J., Riehle M.O., Wilkinson C.D.W., Aitchison G. Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings. IEEE Trans NanoBioscience 2004, 3:61-65.
7. Théry M., Racine V., Piel M., Pépin A., Dimitrov A., Chen Y., et al. Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:19771-19776.
8. Martínez E., Engel E., Planell J., Samitier J. Effects of artificial micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour. Ann Anat 2009, 191:126-135.
9. Tonazzini I., Bystrenova E., Chelli B., Greco P., Stoliar P., Calò A., et al. Multiscale morphology of organic semiconductor thin films controls the adhesion and viability of human neural cells. Biophys J 2010, 98:2804-2812.
10. Di Rienzo C., Jacchetti E., Cardarelli F., Bizzarri R., Beltram F., Cecchini M. Unveiling LOX-1 receptor interplay with nanotopography: mechanotransduction and atherosclerosis onset. Sci Rep 2013, 3:1141.
11. Guilak F., Cohen D.M., Estes B.T., Gimble J.M., Liedtke W., Chen C.S. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:17-26.
12. Kilian K., Bugarija B., Lahn B.T., Mrksich M. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:4872-4877.
13. Lee C.S., Choi C.K., Shin E.Y., Schwartz M.A., Kim E.G. Myosin II directly binds and inhibits Dbl family guanine nucleotide exchange factors: a possible link to Rho family GTPases. JCell Biol 2010, 190:663-674.
14. Eshghi S., Schaffer D.V. Engineering microenvironments to control stem cell fate and function. Stem book [internet] 2008, 1-12. Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge (MA).
15. McMurray R.J., Gadegaard N., Tsimbouri P.M., Burgess K.V., McNamara L.E., Tare R., et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat Mater 2011, 10:637-644.
16. Thiery J. Cell adhesion in development: a complex signaling network. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2003, 13:365-371.
17. Jiang X., Bruzewicz D.A., Wong A.P., Piel M., Whitesides G.M. Directing cell migration with asymmetric micropatterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:975-978.
18. Yokota Y., Gashghaei H.T., Han C., Watson H., Campbell K.J., Anton E.S. Radial glial dependent and independent dynamics of interneuronal migration in the developing cerebral cortex. PloS ONE 2007, 2:e794.
19. Lionetti V., Cecchini M., Ventura C. Nanomechanics to drive stem cells in injured tissues: insights from current research and future perspectives. Stem Cells Dev 2011, 20:561-568.
20. Monje F.J., Kim E.J., Pollak D.D., Cabatic M., Li L., Baston A., et al. Focal adhesion kinase regulates neuronal growth, synaptic plasticity and hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and memory. Neurosignals 2011, 20:1-14.
21. Myers J.P., Gomez T.M. Focal adhesion kinase promotes integrin adhesion dynamics necessary for chemotropic turning of nerve growth cones. JNeurosci 2011, 31:13585-13595.
22. Arimura N., Kaibuchi K. Neuronal polarity: from extracellular signals to intracellular mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007, 8:194-205.
23. Biggs M.J.P., Richards R.G., Dalby M.J. Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. Nanomed-Nanotechnol 2010, 6:619-633.
24. Patel S., Kurpinski K., Quigley R., Gao H., Hsiao B.S., Poo M.M., et al. Bioactive nanofibers: synergistic effects of nanotopography and chemical signaling on cell guidance. Nano Lett 2007, 7:2122-2128.
25. Bystrenova E., Jelitai M., Tonazzini I., Lazar A., Huth M., Stoliar P., et al. Neural networks grown on organic semiconductors. Adv Funct Mater 2008, 18:1751-1756.
26. Dionigi C., Bianchi M., D'Angelo P., Chelli B., Greco P., Shehu A., et al. Control of neuronal cell adhesion on single-walled carbon nanotube 3D patterns. JMater Chem 2010, 20:2213-2218.
27. Valle F., Chelli B., Bianchi M., Greco P., Bystrenova E., Tonazzini I., et al. Stable non-covalent large area patterning of inert teflon-AF surface: a new approach to multiscale cell guidance. Adv Eng Mater 2010, 12:B185-191.
28. Béduer A., Vieu C., Arnauduc F., Sol J.C., Loubinoux I., Vaysse L. Engineering of adult human neural stem cells differentiation through surface micropatterning. Biomaterials 2012, 33:504-514.
29. Wieringa P., Tonazzini I., Micera S., Cecchini M. Nanotopography induced contact guidance of the F11 cell line during neuronal differentiation: a neuronal model cell line for tissue scaffold development. Nanotechnology 2012, 23:275102.
30. Cecchini M., Bumma G., Serresi M., Beltram F. PC12 differentiation on biopolymer nanostructures. Nanotechnology 2007, 18:505103.
31. Cecchini M., Ferrari A., Beltram F. PC12 polarity on biopolymer nanogratings. JPhys Conf Ser 2008, 100:012003.
32. Ferrari A., Faraci P., Cecchini M., Beltram F. The effect of alternative neuronal differentiation pathways on PC12 cell adhesion and neurite alignment to nanogratings. Biomaterials 2010, 31:2565-2573.
33. Ferrari A., Cecchini M., Serresi M., Faraci P., Pisignano D., Beltram F. Neuronal polarity selection by topography-induced focal adhesion control. Biomaterials 2010, 31:4682-4694.
34. Ferrari A., Cecchini M., Dhawan A., Micera S., Tonazzini I., Stabile R., et al. Nanotopographic control of neuronal polarity. Nano Lett 2011, 11:505-511.
35. Varga R., Eriksson M., Erdos M.R., Olive M., Harten I., Kolodgie F., et al. Progressive vascular smooth muscle cell defects in a mouse model of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:3250-3255.
36. Antosova A., Chelli B., Bystrenova E., Siposova K., Valle F., Imrich J., et al. Structure-activity relationship of acridine derivatives to amyloid aggregation of lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011, 1810:465-474.
37. Morawski M., Brückner G., Jäger C., Seeger G., Matthews R.T., Arendt T. Involvement of perineuronal and perisynaptic extracellular matrix in Alzheimer's disease neuropathology. Brain Pathol 2012, 22:547-561.
38. Seimon T., Tabas I. Mechanisms and consequences of macrophage apoptosis in atherosclerosis. JLipid Res 2009, 50:S382-387.
39. Kessenbrock K., Plaks V., Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell 2010, 141:52-67.
40. Schriefl A.J., Zeindlinger G., Pierce D.M., Regitnig P., Holzapfel G. Determination of the layer-specific distributed collagen fibre orientations in human thoracic and abdominal aortas and common iliac arteries. JR Soc Interface 2012, 9:1275-1286.
41. Huang W., Begum R., Barber T., Ibba V., Tee N.C.H., Hussain M., et al. Regenerative potential of silk conduits in repair of peripheral nerve injury in adult rats. Biomaterials 2011, 33:59-71.
42. Tabesh H., Amoabediny G., Nik N.S., Heydari M., Yosefifard M., Siadat S.O.R., et al. The role of biodegradable engineered scaffolds seeded with Schwann cells for spinal cord regeneration. Neurochem Int 2009, 54:73-83.
43. Dalby M.J., McCloy D., Robertson M., Agheli H., Sutherland D., Affrossman S., et al. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. Biomaterials 2006, 27:2980-2987.
44. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007, 6:997-1003.
45. Huang J., Gra S.V., Corbellini F., Rinck S., Bock E., Kemkemer R., et al. Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. Nano Lett 2009, 9:1111-1116.
46. Kantawong F., Robertson M.E., Gadegaard N., Oreffo R.O.C., Burchmore R.J., Dalby M.J. Protein expression of STRO-1 cells in response to different topographic features. JTissue Eng 2011, 2011:534603.
47. Jaalouk D.E., Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10:63-73.
48. Ellis-Behnke R.G., Liang Y.X., You S.W., Tay D.K.C., Zhang S., So K.F., et al. Nano neuro knitting: peptide nanofiber scaffold for brain repair and axon regeneration with functional return of vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:5054-5059.
49. Unadkat H.V., Hulsman M., Cornelissen K., Papenburg B.J., Truckenmüller R.K., Carpenter A.E., et al. An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:16565-16570.
50. Chang Y., Nalbant P., Chang Z., Bokoch G.M. GEF-H1 couples nocodazole-induced microtubule disassembly to cell contractility via RhoA. Mol Biol Cell 2008, 19:2147-2153.
51. Meucci S., Tonazzini I., Beltram F., Cecchini M. Biocompatible noisy nanotopographies with specific directionality for controlled anisotropic cell cultures. Soft Matter 2012, 8:1109-1119.
52. Jang K.J., Kim M.S., Feltrin D., Jeon N.L., Suh K.Y., Pertz O. Two distinct filopodia populations at the growth cone allow to sense nanotopographical extracellular matrix cues to guide neurite outgrowth. PloS one 2010, 5:e15966.
53. Leach J.B., Brown X.Q., Jacot J.G., Dimilla P., Wong J.Y. Neurite outgrowth and branching of PC12 cells on very soft substrates sharply decreases below a threshold of substrate rigidity. JNeural Eng 2007, 4:26-34.
54. Witte H., Neukirchen D., Bradke F. Microtubule stabilization specifies initial neuronal polarization. JCell Biol 2008, 180:619-632.