Pragmatism and realism for public health intervention evaluation;Pragmatisme et réalisme pour l'évaluation des interventions de santé publique

Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique

Volumn 61, Issue SUPPL.2, 2013, Pages

  Ridde, V ^a,b   Haddad, S ^a,b  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Complex interventions; Evaluation; Experiments; Implementation; Mechanisms; Pragmatism; Reinforced research strategies

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SHORT SURVEY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; STANDARD; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84878586148     PISSN: 03987620     EISSN: 17730627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2013.03.037     Document Type: Short Survey

References (46)

1. Blaise P., Marchal B., Lefèvre P., Kegels G. Au-delà des méthodes expérimentales, l'approche réaliste en évaluation. Réduire les inégalités sociales de santé. Collection « Santé en action » 2010, 285-296. INPES, Saint-Denis. L. Potvin, M.J. Moquet, C. Jones (Eds.).
2. Approches et pratiques en évaluation de programme 2012, Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal. 2e éd. V. Ridde, C. Dagenais (Eds.).
3. Latour B. Culture et technique. Les « vues » de l'esprit. Réseaux 1987, 5(27):79-96.
4. Patton M.Q., LaBossière F. L'évaluation axée sur l'utilisation. Approches et pratiques de l'évaluation de programme 2012, 145-160. Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal. 2nd ed. V. Ridde, C. Dagenais (Eds.).
5. Robson C. Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings 2011, Wiley, Chichester (West Sussex), [xxi, 586 p]. 3rd ed.
6. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 2010, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, [xv, 893 p]. 2nd ed.
7. Maclure M. Explaining pragmatic trials to pragmatic policymakers. J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62:476-478.
8. Treweek S., Zwarenstein M. Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials 2009, 10:37.
9. Patsopoulos N.A. A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2011, 13:217-224.
10. Cambon L., Minary L., Ridde V., Alla F. Transferability of interventions in health education: a review. BMC Public Health 2012, 12(1):497.
11. Bamberger M., Rugh J., Mabry L. Real world evaluation: working under budget, time, data and political constraints 2006, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (CA), 504 p.
12. Evaluability assessment 2004, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. 2nd ed. J.S. Wholey (Ed.).
13. Le transfert des connaissances dans le domaine social 2012, Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal. C. Dagenais, T. Robert (Eds.).
14. Trevisan M.S. Evaluability assessment from 1986 to 2006. Am J Eval 2007, 28(3):290-303.
15. Stevahn L., King J.A., Ghere G., Minnema J. Establishing essential competencies for program evaluators. Am J Eval 2005, 26(1):43-59.
16. D'Ostie-Racine L., Dagenais C., Ridde V. An evaluability assessment of a West Africa based Non-Governmental Organization's (NGO) progressive evaluation strategy. Eval Program Plann 2012, 36(1):71-79.
17. Bourdieu P. Science de la science et réflexivité 2001, Raisons d'agir, Paris, 238 p.
18. Nastasi B.K., Hitchcock J.H., Brown L.M. An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies: moving toward fully integrated synergistic research models. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 2010, 305-338. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (CA). A.C.T. Tashakkori (Ed.).
19. Angrist J., Pischke J. The credibility revolution in empirical economics: how better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. J Econ Perspect 2010, 24(2):3-30.
20. Shadish W.R., Cook T.D. The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions. Annu Rev Psychol 2009, 60:607-629.
21. Mercer S., DeVinney B. Study designs for effectiveness and translation research identifying trade-offs. Am J Prev Med 2007, 33(2):139-154.
22. Shadish W.R., Cook T.D., Campbell D.T. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference 2002, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, [xxi, 623 p].
23. Angrist J., Pischke J. Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist's companion 2008, Princeton University Press.
24. Pluye P. Les méthodes mixtes pour l'évaluation des programmes. Approches et pratiques en évaluation de programme (seconde édition) 2012, Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal. V. Ridde, C. Dagenais (Eds.).
25. Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, Bartlett G, O'Cathain A, Griffiths F, et al. Proposal: a mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. Available from: . Retrieved on [date] from . Archived by WebCite® at ; 2011 [cited 2011 Aug 22]. http://www.webcitation.org/5tTRTc9yJ.
26. Atchessi N, Ridde V, Haddad S. Combining user fees exemption with training and supervision helps to maintain the quality of drug prescriptions in Burkina Faso. Health Policy Plann 2012 (In press).
27. Deaton A. Understanding the mechanisms of economic development. J Econ Perspect 2010, 24(3-Summer 2010):3-16.
28. Davidoff F. Heterogeneity is not always noise: lessons from improvement. JAMA 2009, 302(23):2580-2586.
29. Campbell D.T., Stanley J.C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research 1963, Rand McNally, Chicago (Illinois), 84 p.
30. Cook T.D., Campbell D.T. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis for field settings 1979, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 420 p.
31. Mercer S.L., DeVinney B.J., Fine L.J., Green L.W., Dougherty D. Study designs for effectiveness and translation research identifying trade-offs. Am J Prev Med 2007, 33(2):139-154.
32. Petticrew M., Cummins S., Ferrell C., Findlay A., Higgins C., Hoy C., et al. Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health?. Public Health 2005, 119(9):751-757.
33. Dobson D., Cook T.D. Avoiding type III error in program evaluation: results from a field experiment. Eval Program Plann 1980, 3(4):269-276.
34. De Allegri M., Louis V., Tiendrébeogo J., Souares A., Yé M., Tozan Y., et al. Moving towards universal coverage with malaria control interventions: achievements and challenges in rural Burkina Faso. Int J Health Plann Manage 2012, [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 22689390. 10.1002/hpm.2116.
35. Carroll C., Patterson M., Wood S., Booth A., Rick J., Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2007, 2:40.
36. Perez D., Lefevre P., Castro M., Sanchez L., Toledo M.E., Vanlerberghe V., et al. Process-oriented fidelity research assists in evaluation, adjustment and scaling-up of community-based interventions. Health Policy Plan 2011, 26:413-422.
37. Patton M.Q. Utilization-focused evaluation 2008, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi, 688 p. 4th ed.
38. Yin R.K., Ridde V. Théorie et pratiques des études de cas en évaluation. Approches et pratiques en évaluation de programme 2012, 177-193. Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal. 2e éd. V. Ridde, C. Dagenais (Eds.).
39. Nitièma A., Ridde V., Girard J.E. L'efficacité des politiques publiques de santé dans un pays de l'Afrique de l'Ouest : le cas du Burkina Faso. Int Pol Sci Rev 2003, 24(2):237-256.
40. Ridde V., Robert E., Guichard A., Blaise P., Van Olmen J. L'approche Realist à l'épreuve du réel. Rev Can Eval Programme 2012, 26(3):37-59.
41. Astbury B., Leeuw F.L. Unpacking black boxes: mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. Am J Eval 2010, 31(3):363-381.
42. White H., Phillips D. Addressing attribution of cause and effect in small n impact evaluations: towards an integrated framework 2012, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, New Delhi.
43. Merton R.K. Social theory and social structure 1968, Free Press, New York, [xxiii, 702 p].
44. Pawson R., Tilley N. Realistic evaluation 1997, Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks (Cal), [xvii, 235 p].
45. Kane S., Gerretsen B., Scherpbier R., Dal Poz M., Dieleman M. A realist synthesis of randomised control trials involving use of community health workers for delivering child health interventions in low and middle income countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10(286).
46. Ridde V., Guichard A. Perception de quelques mécanismes favorables à la réduction des inégalités sociales de santé en France. Global Health Promotion 2011, 18(3):47-60.