Identifier schemas and research data

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-4

  Lee, Dong Joon ^a   Stvilia, Besiki ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Identifier schemas; Information quality evaluations; Institutional repositories; Research data

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878556770     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15508390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504901311     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Altman, M., & King, G. (2007, March/April). A proposed standard for the scholarly citation of quantitative data. DLib Magazine, 13(3/4).
2. Association of American Universities (AAU). (2012, May 21). Member Institutions and Years of Admission, Association of American Universities, Retrieved from http://www.aau.edu/about/article.aspx?id=5476
3. Berners-Lee, T. (1998). Cool URIs don't change. Retrieved from World Wide Web Consortium website: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/
4. Brase, J., & Farquhar, A. (2011, January/February). Access to research data. D-Lib Magazine, 17(1/2).
5. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS). (2002). Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS) (CCSDS 650.0-B-1). Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/ 650x0b1.pdf
6. Crosas, M. (2011, January/February). The Dataverse Network: An open-source application for sharing, discovering and preserving data. D-Lib Magazine, 17(1/2).
7. Duerr, R., Downs, R., Tilmes, C., Barkstrom, B., Lenhardt, W. C., Glassy, J., Bermudez, L., & Slaughter, P. (2011). On the utility of identification schemes for digital earth science data: An assessment and recommendations. Earth Science Informatics, 4, 139-160.
8. Eppler, M. (2003). Managing information quality: increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive products and processes. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
9. Go, K., & Carroll, J. (2004a). Scenario-based task analysis. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 117-133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Go, K., & Carroll, J. (2004b). The blind men and the elephant: Views of scenario-based system design. Interactions, 11(6), 44-53. doi:10.1145/1029036.1029037
11. Institute for Museum and Library Services (2011). Specifications for projects that develop digital products. Retrieved from http://www.imls.gov/ assets/1/AssetManager/DigitalProducts.pdf
12. International Federation of Library Associations, IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). (1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Final report. (As amended and corrected through February 2009.) Retrieved from http://archive.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/ frbr-2008.pdf
13. Michener, W., Vieglais, D., Vision, T., Kunze, J., Cruse, P., & Janee, G. (2011, January/February). DataONE: Data observation network for earth - Preserving data and enabling innovation in the biological and environmental sciences. D-Lib Magazine, 17(1/2).
14. Moore, R. (2008). Towards a theory of digital preservation. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(3).
15. Moore, R., & Smith, M. (2007). Automated validation of trusted digital repository assessment criteria. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2).
16. National Endowment for the Humanities (2011). Guidance for data management plans for NEH Office of Digital Humanities proposals and awards. Retrieved from http://www.neh.gov/grants/guidelines/pdf/DataManagementPlans.pdf
17. National Institutes of Health. (2010). NIH data sharing policy and implementation guidance (NIH Publication No. 03-05-2003). Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data-sharing/data-sharing- guidance.htm#goals
18. National Science Foundation. (2010). Grant proposal guide (NSF Publication No. gpg11001). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpgprint.pdf
19. Office of Management and Budget. (1999, September 30). Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements With Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations (OMB Circular 110). Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars- a110#36
20. Paskin, N. (2010). Digital object identifier system. In M. Bates & M. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (pp. 1-7). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
21. Smit, E. (2011, January/February). Abelard and Heloise: Why data and publications belong together. D-Lib Magazine, 17(1/2).
22. Starr, J., & Gastl, A. (2011, January/February). isCitedBy: A metadata scheme for DataCite. D-Lib Magazine, 17(1/2).
23. Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M., Shreeves, S., & Cole, T. (2004). Metadata quality for Federated Collections. In: S. Chengulur-Smith, L. Raschid, J. Long, C. Seko (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality - ICIQ 2004. (pp. 111-125). Cambridge, MA: MITIQ.
24. Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale M., & Smith, L. C. (2007). A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1720-1733.
25. Tonkin, E. (2008, July). Persistent identifiers: Considering the options. Ariadne, 56. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue56/tonkin/
26. Vitiello, G. (2004). Identifiers and identification systems: An informational look at policies and roles from a library perspective. D-Lib Magazine, 10(1).
27. Wang, R., & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5-35.
28. Wu, S., Stvilia, B., & Lee, D. J. (in press). Authority control for scientific data: The case of molecular biology. Journal of Library Metadata.
29. Zacharias, M. (2010, May 10). Scientists seeking NSF funding will soon be required to submit data management plans. NSF Press. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/news/news-summ.jsp?cntn-id=116928