Trends in robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients

Urology

Volumn 81, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1336-1341

  Monn, M Francesca ^b   Bahler, Clinton D ^b   Schneider, Eric B ^b   Whittam, Benjamin M ^b   Misseri, Rosalia ^b   Rink, Richard C ^b   Sundaram, Chandru P ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CODING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INFANT; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; ROBOTICS; SCHOOL CHILD; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INFANT; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; ODDS RATIO; ROBOTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84878553857     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.025     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. P. Casale Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population Curr Urol Rep 10 2009 55 59
2. P. Casale, and Y. Kojima Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology: an update Scand J Surg 98 2009 110 119
3. K.W. Chan, K.H. Lee, and Y.H. Tam Early experience of robotic-assisted reconstructive operations in pediatric urology J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20 2010 379 382
4. A. Muneer, M. Arya, and I.S. Shergill Current status of robotic surgery in pediatric urology Pediatr Surg Int 24 2008 973 977
5. J.J. Tomaszewski, D.P. Casella, and R.M. Turner 2nd Pediatric laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: technical considerations J Endourol 26 2012 602 613
6. F. Atug, M. Woods, and S.V. Burgess Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children J Urol 174 4 Pt 1 2005 1440 1442
7. W. Bentas, M. Wolfram, and R. Bräutigam Da Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1 year follow-up World J Urol 21 2003 133 138
8. I. Franco, L.L. Dyer, and P. Zelkovic Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient: hand sewn anastomosis versus robotic assisted anastomosis - is there a difference? J Urol 178 4 Pt 1 2007 1483 1486
9. A. Kutikov, M. Nguyen, and T. Guzzo Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned J Urol 176 2006 2237 2239 [discussion: 2239-2240]
10. R.S. Lee, A.B. Retik, and J.G. Borer Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery J Urol 175 2006 683 687 [discussion: 687]
11. B.J. Minnillo, J.A. Cruz, and R.H. Sayao Long-term experience and outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and young adults J Urol 185 2011 1455 1460
12. L.H. Olsen, Y.F. Rawashdeh, and T.M. Jorgensen Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience J Urol 178 2007 2137 2141 [discussion: 2141]
13. P. Singh, P.N. Dogra, and R. Kumar Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a single center experience J Endourol 26 2012 249 253
14. M.D. Sorensen, C. Delostrinos, and M.H. Johnson Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty J Urol 185 6 Suppl 2011 2517 2522
15. U. Subotic, I. Rohard, and D.M. Weber A minimal invasive surgical approach for children of all ages with ureteropelvic junction obstruction J Pediatr Urol 8 2012 354 358
16. D.S. Yee, A.M. Shanberg, and B.P. Duel Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children Urology 67 2006 599 602
17. J.W. Behan, S.S. Kim, and F. Dorey Human capital gains associated with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children compared to open pyeloplasty J Urol 186 4 Suppl 2011 1663 1667
18. D.A. Freilich, F.J. Penna, and C.P. Nelson Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey J Urol 183 2010 704 708
19. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project - HCUP. A. Introduction to the HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). 2007-2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/ db/nation/nis/NIS-2009-INTRODUCTION.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2012.
20. HCUP Cost-to-Charge Ratio Files (CCR). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2006-2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/costtocharge. jsp. Accessed June 20, 2012.
21. 2013 Medicare Physician Fee Schedules. WPS Medicare. 2013. Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation, Wisconsin. Available at http://www.wpsmedicare.com/j8macpartb/fees/physician-fee-schedule/ 2013-fee-schedule.shtml. Accessed January 7, 2013.