Parental Satisfaction After Open Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Results From Modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey

Journal of Urology

Volumn 183, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 704-708

  Freilich, Drew A ^a   Penna, Frank J ^a   Nelson, Caleb P ^a   Retik, Alan B ^a   Nguyen, Hiep T ^a  

^a Research and Training Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

laparoscopy; patient satisfaction; pediatrics; robotics; urology

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFANT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; ROBOTICS; SCHOOL CHILD; SELF ESTEEM; SKIN SCAR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; PARENTS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROBOTICS; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 73749087070     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.040     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Peters C.A., Schlussel R.N., and Retik A.B. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 153 (1995) 1962
2. Sung G.T., Gill I.S., and Hsu T.H. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study. Urology 53 (1999) 1099
3. Lee R.S., Retik A.B., Borer J.G., et al. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol 175 (2006) 683
4. Munver R., Sosa R.E., and del Pizzo J.J. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: history, evolution, and future. J Endourol 18 (2004) 748
5. Kutikov A., Nguyen M., Guzzo T., et al. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. J Urol 176 (2006) 2237
6. Yee D.S., Shanberg A.M., Duel B.P., et al. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology 67 (2006) 599
7. Olsen L.H., and Jorgensen T.M. Computer assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol 171 (2004) 2629
8. Peters C.A. Robotically assisted paediatric pyeloplasty: cutting edge or expensive toy?. BJU Int 94 (2004) 1214
9. Kubba H., Swan I.R., and Gatehouse S. The Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory: a new instrument for assessing health-related benefit after an intervention. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 113 (2004) 980
10. Alpert S.A., Cheng E.Y., Zebold K.F., et al. Clean intermittent catheterization in genitally sensate children: patient experience and health related quality of life. J Urol 174 (2005) 1616
11. Parekh A.D., Trusler L.A., Pietsch J.B., et al. Prospective, longitudinal evaluation of health related quality of life in the pediatric spina bifida population undergoing reconstructive urological surgery. J Urol 176 (2006) 1878
12. Atug F., Woods M., Burgess S.V., et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 174 (2005) 1440
13. Piedrahita Y.K., and Palmer J.S. Is one-day hospitalization after open pyeloplasty possible and safe?. Urology 67 (2006) 181
14. Schroeck F.R., Krupski T.L., Sun L., et al. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 54 (2008) 785