The healthy worker effect in cancer incidence studies

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 177, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1218-1224

  Kirkeleit, Jorunn ^b   Riise, Trond ^a   Bjørge, Tone ^b   Christiani, David C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b NONE

Author keywords

cancer incidence; cohort studies; educational level; healthy worker effect; mortality

Indexed keywords

CANCER; COHORT ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH RISK; POPULATION TYPE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER RISK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HUMAN; KIDNEY CANCER; LEUKEMIA; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MELANOMA; NORWAY; OVARY CANCER; POPULATION RESEARCH; PROSTATE CANCER; STANDARDIZED INCIDENCE RATIO; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WORKER;

CANCER INCIDENCE; COHORT STUDIES; EDUCATIONAL LEVEL; HEALTHY WORKER EFFECT; MORTALITY;

COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTHY WORKER EFFECT; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; NEOPLASMS; NORWAY; REGISTRIES;

NORWAY;

EID: 84878536226     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws373     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Monson RR. Observations on the healthy worker effect. J Occup Med. 1986;28(6):425-433.
2. Pearce N, Checkoway H, Kriebel D. Bias in occupational epidemiology studies. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(8): 562-568.
3. Baillargon J. Characteristics of the healthy worker effect. Occup Med. 2001;16(2):359-366.
4. Fox AJ, Collier PF. Low mortality rates in industrial cohort studies due to selection for work and survival in the industry. Brit J Prev Soc Med. 1976;30(4):225-230.
5. McMichael AJ. Standardized mortality ratios and the "healthy worker effect": scratching beneath the surface. J Occup Med. 1976;18(3):165-168.
6. Leonard RC, Kreckmann KH, Lineker GA, et al. Comparison of standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) obtained from use of reference populations based on a company-wide registry cohort to SMRs calculated against local and national rates. Chem Biol Interact. 2007;166(1-3):317-322.
7. Choi BCK. Definition, sources, magnitude, effect modifiers, and strategies of reduction of the healthy worker effect. J Occup Med. 1992;34(10):979-988.
8. Lea CS, Hertz-Picciotto I, Andersen A, et al. Gender differences in the healthy worker effect among synthetic vitreous fiber workers. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(10): 1099-1106.
9. Gridley G, Nyren O, Dosemeci M, et al. Is there a healthy worker effect for cancer incidence among women in Sweden? Am J Ind Med. 1999;36(1):193-199.
10. The Norwegian Labour andWelfare Service (NAV). Information about the Norwegian Registry of Employers and Employees (EE-register). Oslo, Norway: The Norwegian Labour andWelfare Service (NAV). (http://www.nav.no/805359897.cms). (Accessed June 18, 2012).
11. Kirkeleit J, Riise T, Bråtveit M, et al. Increased risk of acute myelogenous leukemia and multiple myeloma in a historical cohort of upstream petroleum workers exposed to crude oil. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(1):13-23.
12. Kirkeleit J, Riise T, Bjørge T, et al. Increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in a historical cohort of upstream petroleum workers. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(5):335-340.
13. Larsen IK, Smastuen M, Johannesen TB, et al. Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45(7):1218-1231.
14. Greenberg RS, Mandel JS, Pastides H, et al. A meta-analysis of cohort studies describing mortality and cancer incidence among chemical workers in the Unites States andWestern Europe. Epidemiology. 2001;12(6):727-740.
15. Leonard RC, Kreckmann KH, Sakr CJ, et al. Retrospective cohort mortality study of workers in a polymer production plant including a reference population of regional workers. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18(1):15-22.
16. HuebnerWW,Wojcik NC, Jørgensen G, et al. Mortality patterns and trends among 127,266 U.S.-based men in a petroleum company: update 1979-2000. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51(11):1333-1348.
17. HuebnerWW,Wojcik NC, Jorgensen G, et al. Mortality patterns and trends among 49,705 U.S.-based women in a petroleum company: update 1979-2000. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;52(1):99-108.
18. Gun RT, Pratt NL, Griffith EC, et al. Update of a prospective study of mortality and cancer incidence in the Australian petroleum industry. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(2):150-156.
19. Cancer Registry Norway. Cancer in Norway 2009-cancer incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in Norway. Oslo, Norway: Cancer Registry of Norway; 2011. (http://kreftregisteret.no/en/General/Publications/Cancer-in- Norway/Cancer-in-Norway-2009/). (Accessed June 18, 2012).
20. Stellman SD, Bofetta P, Garfinkel L. Smoking habits of 800,000 American men and women in relation to their occupations. Am J Ind Med. 1988;13(1):43-58.
21. Bofetta P, Kogevinas M,Westerholm P, et al. Exposure to occupational carcinogens and social class differences in cancer occurrence. IARC Sci Publ. 1997;138:331-341.
22. Merletti F, Galassi C, Spadea T. The socioeconomic determinants of cancer. Environ Health. 2011;10(suppl 1): S7.
23. IARCWorking Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2004;83:1-1438.
24. Doll R, Forman D, La Vecchia C, et al. Alcoholic beverages and cancers of the digestive tract and larynx. In: Macdonald I, ed. Health Issues Related to Alcohol Consumption. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999:351-393.
25. Saman DM. A review of the epidemiology of oral and pharyngeal carcinoma: update. Head Neck Oncol. 2012;4:1-7.
26. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, et al. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371(9612): 569-578.
27. Genkinger JM, Spiegelman D, Anderson KE, et al. A pooled analysis of 14 cohort studies of anthropometric factors and pancreatic cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(7): 1708-1717.
28. Pukkala E, Martinsen JI, Lynge E, et al. Occupation and cancer-follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(5):646-790.
29. Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(1):45-60.
30. Sueblinvong T, Carney ME. Current understanding of risk factors for ovarian cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2009; 10(1-2):67-81.
31. Permuth-Wey J, Sellers TA. Epidemiology of ovarian cancer. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;472:413-437.
32. Camargo MC, Stayner LT, Straif K, et al. Occupational exposure to asbestos and ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Env Health Perspect. 2001;119(9):1211-1217.
33. Straif K, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Baan R, et al. A review of human carcinogens-part C: metals, arsenic, dusts, and fibres. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):453-454.
34. Wernli KJ, Ray RM, Gao DL, et al. Occupational exposures and ovarian cancer in textile workers. Epidemiology. 2008; 19(2):244-250.
35. Guo J, Kauppinen T, Kyyrönen P, et al. Risk of esophageal, ovarian, testicular, kidney and bladder cancers and leukemia among Finnish workers exposed to diesel or gasoline engine exhaust. Int J Cancer. 2004;111(2):286-292.
36. Takkouche B, Etminan M, Montes-Martínez A. Personal use of hair dyes and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005;293(20):2516-2525.
37. Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology. 2004;15(5): 615-625.
38. Gilbert E. Some confounding factors in the study of mortality and occupational exposures. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;116(1): 177-188.
39. Steenland K, Stayner L. The importance of employment status in occupational cohort mortality studies. Epidemiology. 1991; 2(6):418-423