Imaging light responses of retinal ganglion cells in the living mouse eye

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 109, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2415-2421

  Yin, Lu ^b   Geng, Ying ^b,c   Osakada, Fumitaka ^d   Sharma, Robin ^b,c   Cetin, Ali H ^d   Callaway, Edward M ^d   Williams, David R ^b,c   Merigan, William H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^d SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Calcium imaging; In vivo adaptive optics imaging; Retinal ganglion cells

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL ADAPTIVE OPTICS CELLULAR IMAGING IN THE LIVING EYE; GENE INSERTION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINA INJURY; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

CALCIUM IMAGING; IN VIVO ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGING; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS;

ANIMALS; CALCIUM; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; OPTOGENETICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; VOLTAGE-SENSITIVE DYE IMAGING;

EID: 84878472989     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01043.2012     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Applebury ML, Antoch MP, Baxter LC, Chun LL, Falk JD, Farhangfar F, Kage K, Krzystolik MG, Lyass LA, Robbins JT. The murine cone photoreceptor: a single cone type expresses both S and M opsins with retinal spatial patterning. Neuron 27: 513-523, 2000.
2. Borghuis BG, Tian L, Xu Y, Nikonov SS, Vardi N, Zemelman BV, Looger LL. Imaging light responses of targeted neuron populations in the rodent retina. J Neurosci 31: 2855-2867, 2011.
3. Brainard DH. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436, 1997.
4. Briggman KL, Euler T. Bulk electroporation and population calcium imaging in the adult mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol 105: 2601-2609, 2011.
5. Busch EM, Gorgels TG, van Norren D. Temporal sequence of changes in rat retina after UV-A and blue light exposure. Vision Res 39: 1233-1247, 1999.
6. Carter-Dawson LD, LaVail MM. Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy. J Comp Neurol 188: 245-262, 1979.
7. Cetin A, Komai S, Eliava M, Seeburg PH, Osten P. Stereotaxic gene delivery in the rodent brain. Nat Protoc 1: 3166-3173, 2006.
8. Chichilnisky EJ, Kalmar RS. Functional asymmetries in ON and OFF ganglion cells of primate retina. J Neurosci 22: 2737-2747, 2002.
9. Delori FC, Webb RH, Sliney DH. Maximum permissible exposures for ocular safety (ANSI 2000), with emphasis on ophthalmic devices. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 24: 1250-1265, 2007.
10. Fu Y. Phototransduction in Rods and Cones. In: Webvision: The Organization of the Retina and Visual System, edited by Kolb H, Nelson R, Fernandez E, Bryan J. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 2011.
11. Geng Y, Dubra A, Yin L, Merigan WH, Sharma R, Libby RT, Williams DR. Adaptive optics retinal imaging in the living mouse eye. Biomed Opt Express 3: 715-734, 2012.
12. Geng Y, Greenberg KP, Wolfe R, Gray DC, Hunter JJ, Dubra A, Flannery JG, Williams DR, Porter J. In vivo imaging of microscopic structures in the rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50: 5872-5879, 2009.
13. Gorgels TG, van Norren D. Ultraviolet and green light cause different types of damage in rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36: 851-863, 1995.
14. Govardovskii VI, Fyhrquist N, Reuter T, Kuzmin DG, Donner K. In search of the visual pigment template. Vis Neurosci 17: 509-528, 2000.
15. Gray DC, Merigan W, Wolfing JI, Gee BP, Porter J, Dubra A, Twietmeyer TH, Ahamd K, Tumbar R, Reinholz F, Williams DR. In vivo fluorescence imaging of primate retinal ganglion cells and retinal pigment epithelial cells. Opt Express 14: 7144-7158, 2006.
16. Gray DC, Wolfe R, Gee BP, Scoles D, Geng Y, Masella BD, Dubra A, Luque S, Williams DR, Merigan WH. In vivo imaging of the fine structure of rhodamine-labeled macaque retinal ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49: 467-473, 2008.
17. Harosi FI. Absorption spectra and linear dichroism of some amphibian photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol 66: 357-382, 1975.
18. Haverkamp S, Wassle H, Duebel J, Kuner T, Augustine GJ, Feng G, Euler T. The primordial, blue-cone color system of the mouse retina. J Neurosci 25: 5438-5445, 2005.
19. Henriksson JT, Bergmanson JP, Walsh JE. Ultraviolet radiation transmittance of the mouse eye and its individual media components. Exp Eye Res 90: 382-387, 2010.
20. Hunter JJ, Masella B, Dubra A, Sharma R, Yin L, Merigan WH, Palczewska G, Palczewski K, Williams DR. Images of photoreceptors in living primate eyes using adaptive optics two-photon ophthalmoscopy. Biomed Opt Express 2: 139-148, 2011.
21. Jacobs GH, Rowe MP. Evolution of vertebrate colour vision. Clin Exp Optom 87: 206-216, 2004.
22. Jacobs GH, Williams GA. Contributions of the mouse UV photopigment to the ERG and to vision. Doc Ophthalmol 115: 137-144, 2007.
23. Jacobs GH, Williams GA, Fenwick JA. Influence of cone pigment coexpression on spectral sensitivity and color vision in the mouse. Vision Res 44: 1615-1622, 2004.
24. Keith BJ Franklin GP. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. New York: Academic, 2007.
25. Lukas TJ, Wang AL, Yuan M, Neufeld AH. Early cellular signaling responses to axonal injury. Cell Commun Signal 7: 5, 2009.
26. Lyubarsky AL, Daniele LL, Pugh EN Jr. From candelas to photoisomerizations in the mouse eye by rhodopsin bleaching in situ and the lightrearing dependence of the major components of the mouse ERG. Vision Res 44: 3235-3251, 2004.
27. Lyubarsky AL, Falsini B, Pennesi ME, Valentini P, Pugh EN Jr. UVand midwave-sensitive cone-driven retinal responses of the mouse: a possible phenotype for coexpression of cone photopigments. J Neurosci 19: 442-455, 1999.
28. Mandolesi G, Madeddu F, Bozzi Y, Maffei L, Ratto GM. Acute physiological response of mammalian central neurons to axotomy: ionic regulation and electrical activity. FASEB J 18: 1934-1936, 2004.
29. Martin PR, Lee BB, White AJ, Solomon SG, Ruttiger L. Chromatic sensitivity of ganglion cells in the peripheral primate retina. Nature 410: 933-936, 2001.
30. Morgan JI, Hunter JJ, Masella B, Wolfe R, Gray DC, Merigan WH, Delori FC, Williams DR. Light-induced retinal changes observed with high-resolution autofluorescence imaging of the retinal pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49: 3715-3729, 2008.
31. Mutoh H, Akemann W, Knopfel T. Genetically engineered fluorescent voltage reporters. ACS Chem Neurosci 3: 585-592, 2012.
32. Naarendorp F, Esdaille TM, Banden SM, Andrews-Labenski J, Gross OP, Pugh EN Jr. Dark light, rod saturation, and the absolute and incremental sensitivity of mouse cone vision. J Neurosci 30: 12495-12507, 2010.
33. Nikonov SS, Kholodenko R, Lem J, Pugh EN Jr. Physiological features of the Sand M-cone photoreceptors of wild-type mice from single-cell recordings. J Gen Physiol 127: 359-374, 2006.
34. Osakada F, Mori T, Cetin AH, Marshel JH, Virgen B, Callaway EM. New rabies virus variants for monitoring and manipulating activity and gene expression in defined neural circuits. Neuron 71: 617-631, 2011.
35. Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442, 1997.
36. Prilloff S, Fan J, Henrich-Noack P, Sabel BA. In vivo confocal neuroimaging (ICON): noninvasive, functional imaging of the mammalian CNS with cellular resolution. Eur J Neurosci 31: 521-528, 2010.
37. Rohlich P, van Veen T, Szel A. Two different visual pigments in one retinal cone cell. Neuron 13: 1159-1166, 1994.
38. Sabel BA, Engelmann R, Humphrey MF. In vivo confocal neuroimaging (ICON) of CNS neurons. Nat Med 3: 244-247, 1997.
39. Sagdullaev BT, McCall MA. Stimulus size and intensity alter fundamental receptive-field properties of mouse retinal ganglion cells in vivo. Vis Neurosci 22: 649-659, 2005.
40. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9: 676-682, 2012.
41. Schmucker C, Schaeffel F. A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse. Vision Res 44: 1857-1867, 2004.
42. Stone C, Pinto LH. Response properties of ganglion cells in the isolated mouse retina. Vis Neurosci 10: 31-39, 1993.
43. Tian L, Hires SA, Mao T, Huber D, Chiappe ME, Chalasani SH, Petreanu L, Akerboom J, McKinney SA, Schreiter ER, Bargmann CI, Jayaraman V, Svoboda K, Looger LL. Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved GCaMP calcium indicators. Nat Methods 6: 875-881, 2009.
44. van Norren D, Gorgels TG. The action spectrum of photochemical damage to the retina: a review of monochromatic threshold data. Photochem Photobiol 87: 747-753, 2011.
45. Wang YV, Weick M, Demb JB. Spectral and temporal sensitivity of cone-mediated responses in mouse retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci 31: 7670-7681, 2011.
46. Weitz AC, Behrend MR, Lee NS, Klein RL, Chiodo VA, Hauswirth WW, Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Chow RH. Imaging the retina's response to electrical stimulation with genetically encoded calcium indicators. J Neurophysiol 2013 Jan 23 [Epub ahead of print].
47. Zariwala HA, Borghuis BG, Hoogland TM, Madisen L, Tian L, De Zeeuw CI, Zeng H, Looger LL, Svoboda K, Chen TW. A Cre-dependent GCaMP3 reporter mouse for neuronal imaging in vivo. J Neurosci 32: 3131-3141, 2012.