Policy stakeholders' perceptions of carbon capture and storage: A comparison of four U.S. States

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 52, Issue , 2013, Pages 21-32

  Chaudhry, Rumika ^a   Fischlein, Miriam ^b   Larson, Joel ^c   Hall, Damon M ^e   Peterson, Tarla Rai ^d   Wilson, Elizabeth J ^c   Stephens, Jennie C ^a  

^a CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

CCS; Energy policy; Energy technology; Perceptions; Risk perceptions; SPEED

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; CCS; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS;

CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; GLOBAL WARMING; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SOCIAL SCIENCES; SPEED; TECHNOLOGY;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 84878382806     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. K. Bäckstrand, and J. Meadowcroft The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage: framing an emergent technology Global Environmental Change 21 2 2011 275 281
2. F.S. Berry, and W.D. Berry Innovation and diffusion models in policy research P.A. Sabatier, Theories of the Policy Process 2007 Westview Press Boulder 223 260
3. L. Bird, and M. Bolinger Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States Energy Policy 33 11 2005 1397 1407 (Pubitemid 40058767)
4. C. Bohn, and C. Lant Welcoming the wind? Determinants of wind power development among US states Professional Geographer 61 1 2009 87 100
5. A. Boies, and D. Kittelson Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Transportation Sources in Minnesota 2008 Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota
6. Boyd, A. D., Y. Liu, et al. "Controversy in Technology Innovation: Contrasting Media and Expert Risk Perception of the Alleged Leakage at the Weyburn Carbon Dioxide Storage Demonstration Project." International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. (in press).
7. J. Bradbury, and I. Ray The role of social factors in shaping public perceptions of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the U.S 9th International Conference on Greenhousegas Control Technologies 2008 Elsevier Washington DC
8. J. Bradbury, and I. Ray The role of social factors in shaping public perceptions of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the US Energy Procedia 1 1 2009 4665 4672
9. S. Breukers, and M. Wolsink Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: an international comparison Energy Policy 35 5 2007 2737 2750 (Pubitemid 46381422)
10. J.W. Creswell Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions 1998 Sage Thousand Oaks
11. 2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 3 3 2009 322 332
12. DoE Carbon Sequestration Technology Roadmap and Program Plan 2007 2007 U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon-seq/refshelf/ project%20portfolio/2007/2007Roadmap.pdf
13. M. Fischlein, and J. Larson Policy stakeholders and deployment of wind power in the sub-national context: a comparison of four U.S. states Energy Policy 38 2010 4429 4439
14. V. Gray Innovation in the states: a diffusion study The American Political Science Review 67 4 1973 1174 1185
15. O.R. Holsti Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities 1969 Addison-Wesley London
16. D.J. Hruschka, and D. Schwartz Reliability in coding open-ended data: lessons learned from HIV behavioral research Field Methods 16 3 2004 307 331
17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change B. Metz, O. Davidson, H. d. Coninck, Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage 2005 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Geneva
18. 2 Storage: A Legal and Regulatory Guide for States 2008 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC) http://iogcc.publishpath. com/Websites/iogcc/pdfs/Road-to-a-Greener-Energy-Future.pdf
19. IPCC IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage B. Metz, 2005 Cambridge University Press UK
20. S. Jacobsson, and A. Johnson The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research Energy Policy 28 9 2000 625 640 (Pubitemid 30442161)
21. 2 in an enhanced oil recovery system Environmental Science and Technology 43 21 2009 8027 8032
22. K. Krippendorf Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology 1980 Sage New York, N.Y
23. K. Kurasaki Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data Field Methods 12 3 2000 179 194
24. Y.S. Lincoln, and E.G. Guba Naturalistic Inquiry 1985 Sage Publications, Inc Newbury Park, California
25. Luhmann Social Systems 1995 Stanford University Press Stanford CA Translated by J. Bednarz, Jr. from Soziale Systeme: GrundriBeiner allgeneinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 1984
26. N. Luhmann Ecological Communication 1989 University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL
27. N. Markusson, and S. Shackley The Social Dynamic of Carbon Capture and Storage: Understanding CCS Representations, Governance and Innovation 2012 Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, EarthScan
28. R. Mattoon The electricity system at the crossroads Society 40 1 2002 64 79
29. J. Meadowcroft, and O. Langhelle Caching the Carbon: The Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage 2009 Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK
30. National Energy Technology Laboratory Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants 2007 U.S. Department of Energy Pittsburgh
31. C.R. Palmgren, W.B. d, and Bruin Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide Environmental Science and Technology 38 24 2004 6441 6450
32. T.D. Peterson, and K. Colburn Montana Climate Change Action Plan 2007 (Final Report of the Governor's Climate Change Advisory Committee)
33. M. Pollak, and J. Johnson The geography of CCS regulatory development in the U.S Energy Procedia 1 2009 4543 4550
34. M. Pollak, and S.J. Phillips Carbon capture and storage policy in the United States: a new coalition endeavors to change existing policy Global Environmental Change 21 2 2011 313 323
35. M.F. Pollak, and B. Meyer Reducing greenhouse gas emissions: lessons from state climate action plans Energy Policy 39 2011 5429 5439
36. M.F. Pollak, and E.J. Wilson Regulating geologic sequestration in the United States: early rules take divergent approaches Environmental Science and Technology 43 9 2009 3035 3041
37. W.J. Potter, and D. Levine-Donnerstein Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis Journal of Applied Communication Research 27 1999 258 284
38. B.G. Rabe Statehouse and Greenhouse. The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy 2004 Brookings Institution Washington DC
39. B.G. Rabe Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Evolving Politics of American Climate Change Policy 2004 Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C
40. B.G. Rabe States on steroids: the intergovernmental Odyssey of American climate policy Review of Policy Research 25 2 2008 105 128
41. C.J. Ragland, and A. Feldpausch-Parker Socio-political dimensions of CCS deployment through the lens of social network analysis 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Technologies (GHGT-10) Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2010 (Energy Procedia)
42. K.U. Rao, and V.V.N. Kishore A review of technology diffusion models with special reference to renewable energy technologies Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 3 2010 1070 1078
43. D. Reiner A Looming Rhetorical Gap: A Survey of Public Communications Activities for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Technologies 2008 EPRG Working Paper 0801 http://www.electricitypolicy.org.uk/pubs/wp/eprg0801.pdf European Commission FP6 ACCSEPT Project
44. D.M. Reiner, and T.E. Curry American exceptionalism? Similarities and differences in national attitudes toward energy policy and global warming Environmental Science and Technology 40 7 2006 2093 2098
45. J.A. Sautter, and K. Twaite A fractured climate? The political economy of public utility commissions in an age of climate change Electricity Journal 22 6 2009 68 76
46. S. Shackley, and B. Evar Up and down with CCS: the issue-attention cycle and the political dynamics of decarbonisation N. Markusson, S. Shackley, B. Evar, The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage: Understanding Representation, Governance and Innovation 2012 Routledge
47. 2 storage International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 3 5 2009 641 651
48. J.D. Smith Clean coal: clean coal technology is not an Oxymoron Coal Power Magazine 2006
49. S. Stemler An overview of content analysis Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7 17 2001
50. J. Stephens Growing interest in carbon capture and storage (CCS) for climate change mitigation Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 2 2 2006 4 13
51. J.C. Stephens Technology leader, policy laggard: carbon capture and storage (CCS) development for climate mitigation in the U.S. Political context J. Meadowcroft, O. Langhelle, Caching the Carbon: The Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage 2009 Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham, UK 22 49
52. J.C. Stephens, and A. Hansson Characterizing the international carbon capture and storage community Global Environmental Change 21 2011 379 390
53. J.C. Stephens, and G.M. Rand Wind energy in US media: a comparative state-level analysis of a critical climate change mitigation technology Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 3 2 2009 168 190
54. J.C. Stephens, and E.J. Wilson Socio-Political Evaluation of Energy Deployment (SPEED): an integrated research framework analyzing energy technology deployment Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75 8 2008 1224 1246
55. J.C. Stephens, and E.J. Wilson Socio-Political Evaluation of Energy Deployment (SPEED): an integrated research framework analyzing energy technology deployment Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75 2008 1224 1246
56. L.H. Thorleifson Potential Capacity for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in the Midcontinent Rift System in Minnesota 2008 Minnesota Geological Survey Open File Report 138
57. 2 capture and storage: evidence from government RD&D budgets Mitigation, Adaptation, Strategy Global Change 13 2008 1 21 (Pubitemid 350196872)
58. K. van Alphen, and P.M. Noothout Evaluating the development of carbon capture and storage technologies in the United States Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 2010 971 986
59. R.P. Weber Basic Content Analysis 1990 (Newbury Park, CA)
60. E.J. Wilson, and S.J. Friedmann Research for Deployment: Incorporating risk, regulation, and liability for carbon capture and sequestration Environmental Science and Technology 41 17 2007 5945 5952 (Pubitemid 47394965)
61. E.J. Wilson, and J.C. Stephens Wind deployment in the United States: states, resources, policy, and discourse Environmental Science and Technology 43 24 2009 9063 9070
62. E.J. Wilson, and J.C. Stephens Wind in a carbon-managed world: states, resources, policy and discourse Environmental Science and Technology 43 24 2009 9063 9070
63. E.J. Wilson, and J.C. Stephens Carbon capture and storage in context: the importance of state policy and discourse in deploying emerging energy technologies Energy Procedia 1 1 2009 4519 4526
64. G. Wong-Parodi, and I. Ray Environmental non-government organizations' perceptions of geologic sequestration Environmental Research Letters 3 2 2008 8